heartofthacity
Banned
- 991
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2008
Thats arguable.Originally Posted by an dee 51o
You have it all wrong, dude. Meth is way easier to acquire in a lot of places than crack. You have dudes with like an IQ of like 40 able to cook meth in their trailer homes and apartments, using things you can buy at Home Depot. Part of the reason that it's so cheap is that there aren't that many middlemen involved. It pretty much goes Manufacturer -> dealer -> user. Coke/ crack usually goes through a lot of hands before it gets to the user.Originally Posted by heartofthacity
I would say the biggest factor would be location and access.
Cocaine STAYS being transported into the states, and although you have a few busts here and there, the presence of cocaine in the U.S. is inevitable.
Now because coke is readily available, it can be easily made into freebase (crack) by individual small-time dealers. So between cheap cost and EXTREMELY
easy access in just about anywhere in the states, its not that surprising that crack is so popular.
Meth is a bit newer; because it is completely manmade and not derived from a plant (not saying making coke from coca plants is simple but its definitely simpler than manufacturing meth) it is more difficult to acquire, and to a certain extent transport meth. Meth (crystal) can be smoked/snorted without having to make a freebase.
I always hear people/documentaries talking about "its as easy as mixing A and B"
Its really not.
There is a HUGE amount of preparation involved, and contrary to popular belief, access to the ingredients is not easy at all.
Some stuff has to be purchased at chemical supply stores, other things send up red flags when you buy enough to manufacture a tiny bit of meth.
There are several complicated steps, its dangerous (explosives), the fumes are toxic (health risk), you have to deal with the byproducts, and theres a huge legal risk.
Those factors keep meth from being produced by the average joe..