"It is just art" is hilarious man.
It's all art, bro. Whether it's tasteful or distasteful to you doesn't matter. Raunchy porn is art. "Boys Will Be Boys" sold on Amazon is art. We all take it differently. People collect stuff we don't understand. All we know is that all of this stuff was presented in a court of law to average White adults (the jury) and after six months they just shrugged and said "he didn't anything wrong but he sure is weird." He had been investigated for nearly 20 years and nothing stuck, not even a single porn mag. If you still want to play Columbo, be my guest. Why you guys still try to paint him as a pedophile when there has never been proof to substantiate those claims befuddles me. The pros did their job and that is not good enough for you? Their whole basis for locking him up was, "well if he owns this material then surely he must've molested that kid"..... "if he slept in the same sleeping bag then he is definitely a child molester." That's not how you prove something and yet people still think that whatever they see on the surface tells the whole story. No one ever takes the time to look beneath the surface of Michael Jackson. The dude had a Peter Pan statue in front of his house! A trained psychologist evaluated him during that trial and said he had the mind of a 15-year old. You are talking about pedophilia during Roman times but it is still going strong today in OUR culture. We just throw away the key now. It will always be present in society. So to say the art during their era had pedo undertones because that's how they got down is just speculation on your part. You can say the same about lots of art now. You're trying to put two and two together the same way they did to Michael. "Well since the Romans were freaky, (Artist who painted naked angel babies) was probably a pedophiliac." Form the conclusions you want but at least admit you will never truly know what inspired that art. We do know that MJ did not molest any children regardless of the **** that was on his IBM laptop.
Not ignoring anything. Not even sure how you came to the conclusion that I was.
Yea I referenced the freak stuff that went on in Rome earlier.those saying child porn is wrong, have you guys read what would go on during the roman times? they would lock little kids up together for days forcing them to have sex with each other
edit:
also what about those child angels being naked in roman statues ?
those saying child porn is wrong, have you guys read what would go on during the roman times? they would lock little kids up together for days forcing them to have sex with each other
edit:
also what about those child angels being naked in roman statues ?
because they have nothing better to do.
Actually, it probably has something to do with the currently ongoing lawsuit vs AEG. It's no coincidence that all of a sudden certain things keep being dug up in an attempt to soil his name.
my sister already saw mine being nosey. Had that Brazilian orgy ,onion booty, and hundreds of girl pics only on deck at 16. She was like well at least I know you ain't gay.lol
