- 1,155
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
yawn.
I'LL ALWAYS ROLL WITH RANDY.
I'LL ALWAYS ROLL WITH RANDY.
Name me one better WR than Andre Johnson.
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by lexuslaf,
- Start date
- 25,455
- 640
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
Originally Posted by CP1708
This is the funniest one of all the replies.
whats so funny?
- 15,460
- 4,668
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2007
QFT!!!!!
I was saying Dre was the best in the NFL even when Fitz was killing in the postseason last year
Originally Posted by Bigmike23
Originally Posted by CP1708
This is the funniest one of all the replies.
whats so funny?
Steve Smith is like that dude in Jerry McGuire tryna get his contract.
I like Smith, dude is tough as nails, but he isn't the top reciever in the game over Andre Johnson. Not close either. I like him, and respect him, and Icertainly understand he doesn't get numbers because of a scrub garbage QB, but if they were sittin on the free agent market askin for the same money, Drewould go first to each and every team in the league and you know it.
- 4,112
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2006
LMAO at Dre
- 31,965
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
Steve Smith is "not close" to being the best WR in the League?
...
...
- 12,105
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
- 8,864
- 3,376
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2004
- 25,455
- 640
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
- 17,521
- 23,249
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
your an idiot
- 6,686
- 933
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2004
Without really thinking about it, Steve Smith aint better than AJ... Nor Fitz, Boldin, Moss, or Marshall
- 31,965
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
Brandon Marshall's not my boy. He's just as good if not better than Andre Johnson.
Calvin Johnson does not belong in the conversation yet.
He's a beast and my favorite WR but Steve Smith is head and shoulders better than him.
and the difference between Smitty and any other WR you can name is miniscule at best
Calvin Johnson does not belong in the conversation yet.
He's a beast and my favorite WR but Steve Smith is head and shoulders better than him.
and the difference between Smitty and any other WR you can name is miniscule at best
Allen and Dre, aren't you two comparing Tate and Welker and Smith as similar types in the McShay thread, but now in here I'm supposed to be ok withSmith is the best WR in the game? So Welker and Tate have that kinda shot too then huh?
I understand you aren't truly saying they are his equal, I'm merely pointing out that you use them as his comparisons. Safe to say Welker and Tatedon't match up well with Andre or Randy or Larry do they?
I understand you aren't truly saying they are his equal, I'm merely pointing out that you use them as his comparisons. Safe to say Welker and Tatedon't match up well with Andre or Randy or Larry do they?
- 9,264
- 58
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2003
Fitz ... you should rename this to 3 OP
- 1,698
- 50
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2003
Larry Fitzgerald
- 12,105
- 1,410
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2008
- 31,965
- 1,056
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2007
Originally Posted by maldonado
- 1,505
- 13
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2002
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
Brandon.Marshall.
My Son aka I got Routes!
- 1,346
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2007
Crabtree
?
I said Tate could do what Welker does in the slot.
Nobody was drawing parallels between Smith and Welker.
Golden Tate can be viewed as a Steve Smith - lite with his play making and catching bombs.
This is what I was talkin about.......
dreClark wrote:
Wes Welker on steroids in the right fit.
Just as I start to somewhat see the Smitty %*@+ you've been harping on for 2 years in reference to Golden, you switch to Wes Welker.
Wes has superior quickness and routes tho
For him not to be some athletic beast, Tate runs some ugly routes. He just makes up for them w/ his sick hands
So you used to say Tate was like Smith, and now have come down a bit to Welker? I got'ya.
Like I said, no disrespect to Smith, but I don't think of him at all as a top WR. Isn't he basically a faster/quicker version of Hines? Nobody gonnaput Ward up near the top.
- 16,335
- 13
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2002
- 6,376
- 433
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2007
Ask this question a few weeks ago and people would be singing a different tune....
Less than a year ago Fitz was the run-away winner.
The top 5ish WRs are all interchangeable from week to week.
Less than a year ago Fitz was the run-away winner.
The top 5ish WRs are all interchangeable from week to week.
Wait, what?
Not at all.
Both are better then average blockers, both have good hands, run over the middle, tough and fearless, Smith is just much quicker and faster then Ward, plusSmith will go up and get the ball better then Hines does, I know Hines sticks closer to the ground.