NBA FINALS: If its Denver/Orlando... Who would host game 1?

9,400
5,435
Joined Sep 17, 2006
Does the home court go to the team with the best record or highest seed?
Would game 1 and 2 be in Denver or Orlando?

also, are the finals 2-3-2? or 2-2-1-1-1 like the current series?

trying to plan another trip.... thanks in advance
 
1,333
32
Joined Aug 24, 2006
Originally Posted by rayray3thousand

Does the home court go to the team with the best record or highest seed?
Would game 1 and 2 be in Denver or Orlando?

also, are the finals 2-3-2? or 2-2-1-1-1 like the current series?

trying to plan another trip.... thanks in advance
I think it's based on record?! But it would be a 2-3-3 series.
 
269
10
Joined Jul 21, 2008
So you planning a trip around a team that 2-2 and doesn't have homecourt anymore
 
1,507
10
Joined Jan 6, 2007
orlando would since they had the better regular season record. why would you want to make another trip to denver though? their last home game is on friday
 
9,400
5,435
Joined Sep 17, 2006
Thanks guys ^^ Im in denver right now... went to games 3,4 and got tickets for game 6. I was thinking about staying up for games 1 and 2 if they hosted butcan't stick around for a full week to wait for games 3 and 4 to come back to Denver.... appreciate it
 
24,720
436
Joined Mar 3, 2006
Originally Posted by deveroesshopper

finals is 2-3-2

orlando gets home adv. b/c of record
This.


And Denver/ORL would still pull decent rating because of Dwight, not as good as LeBron, but still.
 
4,686
26
Joined Aug 9, 2008
Originally Posted by KnockoutNed

Originally Posted by rayray3thousand

Does the home court go to the team with the best record or highest seed?
Would game 1 and 2 be in Denver or Orlando?

also, are the finals 2-3-2? or 2-2-1-1-1 like the current series?

trying to plan another trip.... thanks in advance
I think it's based on record?! But it would be a 2-3-3 series.

 
3,093
42
Joined Jul 1, 2008
Originally Posted by KB8sandiego

Going to have worse ratings than Spurs vs Nets.
so let the lakers and cavs win for the sake of ratings? i personally would like this series to happen, for a change
 
20,313
1,476
Joined Jan 19, 2002
that 2-3-2 schedule sometimes is an advantage to the away team
you steal 1 on the road then you go home for 3 game tied at 1 a piece
 
7,211
13
Joined Feb 26, 2005
Originally Posted by jepeh21

Originally Posted by KB8sandiego

Going to have worse ratings than Spurs vs Nets.
so let the lakers and cavs win for the sake of ratings? i personally would like this series to happen, for a change
Who said anything about the Lakers and Cavs?

I'm comparing it to the Spurs vs. Nets.
 
4,754
186
Joined Dec 29, 2005
Originally Posted by Mr Jordan04

that 2-3-2 schedule sometimes is an advantage to the away team
you steal 1 on the road then you go home for 3 game tied at 1 a piece
or it backfires if you lose both because you are forced to win all 3 at home. i don't like it personally but i understand why they do it.
 
1,875
10
Joined Feb 20, 2008
JapanAir21 wrote: [hr][/hr]
Originally Posted by deveroesshopper

finals is 2-3-2

orlando gets home adv. b/c of record
This.


And Denver/ORL would still pull decent rating because of MELO, not as good as being better than LeBron, but still. And D12 being a freak of nature.



 
9,530
91
Joined Dec 17, 2003
This would be a dream Finals match up. A Finals without Lakers/Cavs would be so appreciated.
 
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now