Nike Air Max2 Light 2019 retro.

Discussion in 'Nike Retro' started by modus47, May 17, 2018.

  1. s dubl

    s dubl

    26,185
    11,399
    Joined
    Dec 4, 2006
    Midsole foam is all phylon, I worded my previous reply wrong.
     
  2. jdunlap850

    jdunlap850

    199
    196
    Joined
    Jul 18, 2017
    Just got my pair of the Atmos joints from SnS today. They look decent in person although it really is a wild shoe. I don't think they're trash but they are DEFINITELY not for everybody and not a shoe I feel I can pull off.

    Material is pretty nice but the most polarizing feature of the shoe has got to be that clear plastic overlay,
     
    perfectchaosrei and truenike81 like this.
  3. niketock88

    niketock88

    1,663
    940
    Joined
    Sep 25, 2015
    So nightwing was wrong about the forefoot zoom?
     
  4. tigo0240

    tigo0240

    9,509
    8,325
    Joined
    Aug 23, 2013
    Never had the originals. But the timeline doesn't really match up. So yeah, he was mistaken.
     
  5. illistic

    illistic

    4,440
    14,152
    Joined
    Nov 13, 2007


    IG: @sgo8
     
  6. niketock88

    niketock88

    1,663
    940
    Joined
    Sep 25, 2015
    Its strange that bidets and sneakersnstuff even have a description with the forefoot air. So weird man
     
  7. Im speeding call the cops

    Im speeding call the cops

    2,320
    1,236
    Joined
    Dec 10, 2017
    I guess there is no forefoot air.... but AM1 does have forefoot air.
    4B5B64C1-B486-4E98-B173-A93148EAD779.png
    22F5AF99-F45D-41DA-8824-8C5CC3F7D7BF.jpeg


    History of AM
    BF793843-0A06-4441-A94E-62F6EC2CA8AC.jpeg
    AM2L was not listed though
     

    Attached Files:

    calye2da likes this.
  8. niketock88

    niketock88

    1,663
    940
    Joined
    Sep 25, 2015
    sorry, i meant bodega***
     
  9. tigo0240

    tigo0240

    9,509
    8,325
    Joined
    Aug 23, 2013
    bidets :lol:
     
  10. niketock88

    niketock88

    1,663
    940
    Joined
    Sep 25, 2015
    Not so intuitive keyboard. Lol
     
  11. niketock88

    niketock88

    1,663
    940
    Joined
    Sep 25, 2015
    Idk man theres a ton of sites saying there was forefoot zoom. Even sneakerfreaker.. when it comes to air maxes, esp...i cant question them
     
  12. ARK

    ARK

    6,462
    6,154
    Joined
    Dec 27, 2012
    Lol there is zero zoom in these. I had the originals and I sure don’t remember anything in that forefoot at least.
     
    Last edited: Apr 10, 2019
  13. fargin

    fargin

    1,339
    1,951
    Joined
    Jul 22, 2015
    No John Deere or Maga-hat comments please.

    20190410_175829.jpg
     
    da hen, s dubl, Sambrosia and 3 others like this.
  14. johngotty

    johngotty

    3,227
    554
    Joined
    Mar 21, 2001
    @fargin the hat is my favorite part of the collection
     
  15. perfectchaosrei

    perfectchaosrei

    566
    1,411
    Joined
    Nov 26, 2014
    make air maxes great again
     
  16. Poohdini_816

    Poohdini_816

    135
    68
    Joined
    Sep 22, 2018
    Just got my atmos pair...pretty damn nice imo. If I could of grabbed these at that 140 I would of been very cool w/ my purchase. But, otherwise nice shoe
     
  17. ozboi

    ozboi

    6,568
    7,687
    Joined
    May 7, 2016
    SNS pair supposed to arrive tomorrow.... I can't wait!
     
  18. s dubl

    s dubl

    26,185
    11,399
    Joined
    Dec 4, 2006
    The hat>the shoes
     
  19. Im speeding call the cops

    Im speeding call the cops

    2,320
    1,236
    Joined
    Dec 10, 2017
    To me this comment is true

    I feel you have to be high fashioned, well built body, to mix-match Atmos AM2L with your outfit
     
    Sambrosia likes this.
  20. GrizzlyAnimal

    GrizzlyAnimal

    74,144
    76,157
    Joined
    Apr 22, 2012
    Gonna double up if they go low enough..
    [​IMG]
     
  21. modus47

    modus47

    5,389
    5,163
    Joined
    Dec 12, 2004
    After 2 wears I think I'm actually slightly disappointed in this retro, but maybe I was just expecting too much.

    The surprisingly roomy front part of the shoe makes them feel a bit.... big/bloated something like that, although it doesn't really show on most pics.
    Front of toebox is almost square, brick/cliff like and not just on my pair, visible on a lot of shop pics.
    These 2 combined.... :frown:

    Also 3/4 rear is not the best view as especially the rear air unit looks way too thin/small there.
    And finally the cushioning isn't exactly sensational. It's not bad but even some AM1 retros feel smoother, and my Span retros are way more comfortable (and feel lightweight).

    Back then this shoe was 1 of Nikes top models, and I expected the retros to sort of resemble that experience. But they don't.
    Not even sure yet if I'm gonna buy more cws.

    2019-04-11_193627.jpg 2019-04-11_194724.jpg
     
    AirLoMax614 likes this.
  22. vig09

    vig09

    2,984
    3,635
    Joined
    Dec 13, 2012
    Nike retros are usually crap , that’s why pairs like these , 93,94 spans etc I only buy at 50% off or I don’t buy at all
     
  23. johngotty

    johngotty

    3,227
    554
    Joined
    Mar 21, 2001
    Said before that i think a half size down b/c the toebox is mad roomy. Other than that, the comfort is regular retro fine imo. Nothing crazy, just a decent shoe to wear.
     
  24. modus47

    modus47

    5,389
    5,163
    Joined
    Dec 12, 2004
    I don't think I could go .5 down lengthwise.