Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Nike Retro' started by modus47, May 17, 2018.
Midsole foam is all phylon, I worded my previous reply wrong.
Just got my pair of the Atmos joints from SnS today. They look decent in person although it really is a wild shoe. I don't think they're trash but they are DEFINITELY not for everybody and not a shoe I feel I can pull off.
Material is pretty nice but the most polarizing feature of the shoe has got to be that clear plastic overlay,
So nightwing was wrong about the forefoot zoom?
Never had the originals. But the timeline doesn't really match up. So yeah, he was mistaken.
Nike Air Max2 Light "Blue Lagoon" 01 by Sean Go, on Flickr
Nike Air Max2 Light "Blue Lagoon" 02 by Sean Go, on Flickr
Nike Air Max2 Light "Blue Lagoon" 03 by Sean Go, on Flickr
Its strange that bidets and sneakersnstuff even have a description with the forefoot air. So weird man
I guess there is no forefoot air.... but AM1 does have forefoot air.
History of AM
AM2L was not listed though
sorry, i meant bodega***
Not so intuitive keyboard. Lol
Idk man theres a ton of sites saying there was forefoot zoom. Even sneakerfreaker.. when it comes to air maxes, esp...i cant question them
Lol there is zero zoom in these. I had the originals and I sure don’t remember anything in that forefoot at least.
No John Deere or Maga-hat comments please.
@fargin the hat is my favorite part of the collection
make air maxes great again
Just got my atmos pair...pretty damn nice imo. If I could of grabbed these at that 140 I would of been very cool w/ my purchase. But, otherwise nice shoe
SNS pair supposed to arrive tomorrow.... I can't wait!
The hat>the shoes
To me this comment is true
I feel you have to be high fashioned, well built body, to mix-match Atmos AM2L with your outfit
Gonna double up if they go low enough..
After 2 wears I think I'm actually slightly disappointed in this retro, but maybe I was just expecting too much.
The surprisingly roomy front part of the shoe makes them feel a bit.... big/bloated something like that, although it doesn't really show on most pics.
Front of toebox is almost square, brick/cliff like and not just on my pair, visible on a lot of shop pics.
These 2 combined....
Also 3/4 rear is not the best view as especially the rear air unit looks way too thin/small there.
And finally the cushioning isn't exactly sensational. It's not bad but even some AM1 retros feel smoother, and my Span retros are way more comfortable (and feel lightweight).
Back then this shoe was 1 of Nikes top models, and I expected the retros to sort of resemble that experience. But they don't.
Not even sure yet if I'm gonna buy more cws.
Nike retros are usually crap , that’s why pairs like these , 93,94 spans etc I only buy at 50% off or I don’t buy at all
Said before that i think a half size down b/c the toebox is mad roomy. Other than that, the comfort is regular retro fine imo. Nothing crazy, just a decent shoe to wear.
I don't think I could go .5 down lengthwise.