Nike Diamond Turf back, Falcons and Emeralds in stores now $115

Discussion in 'Nike Retro' started by Hahahaha, Apr 12, 2017.

  1. twinz

    twinz

    227
    68
    Joined
    Dec 24, 2012
    You're right but I think someone Odell could sell a sneaker, I mean even Bret Farve and Dan Marino had hot trainers.
     
  2. da hen

    da hen

    3,583
    1,717
    Joined
    May 1, 2002
    ^^^ good start.

    Mike Trout, Griffey, Rafa, Agassi
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2017
  3. trethousandgt

    trethousandgt

    3,470
    1,068
    Joined
    Apr 5, 2003

    This.
     
  4. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
    vick could of brought back cross trainers in the early 00s with his line too bad he was a dummy fighting dogs.

    it sucks cuz when you think about it cross trainers are the only style of shoe that has failed to see a come back....skate shoes,runners,basketball kicks even tennis shoes have come in and out of popularity thru out the years..

    cross trainers have been dead since 97.
     
  5. trainspotter

    trainspotter

    2,738
    815
    Joined
    Feb 25, 2009
    Truth. Wonder why this is
     
  6. nuclear90

    nuclear90

    5,067
    1,203
    Joined
    Jun 12, 2014
    Cross trainers are going to mainly fall to the football sect.

    A lot of football players unless you are the qb or an over-the-top personality you aren't getting much facetime on tv. Your wearing a helmet when your on the field. Football players aren't as marketable because their faces aren't seen as often.

    Of all the players right now the ones with a larger appeal would be: Brady, Gronk, Cam, and maybe Winston. Cam and Brady have UA deals.
     
    Koncrete Kickz likes this.
  7. pinero84

    pinero84

    367
    62
    Joined
    Nov 3, 2013
    outlet material epscially after they messed up the leather strap tongue piece smh. why not retro the dt4s  or the dt5s smh. i would be happy with a re release of the dt max 96 with proper painting material.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2017
  8. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
    i guess thats a decent point since deion was bigger than life back in the day but how do you explain bo's success? sure he came across as a nice guy and all but wasn't exactly known for his wit or charm.

    what about shoes like the missions,veers and barrages which were team shoes and really had no face/personality behind them...but yet sold like crazy.

    i think the main reason people don't mess with cross trainers these days is the bulkiness.cross trainers are just bulky by nature and nobody is wearing baggy clothes no more.

    which would also explain why everyone is obsessed with runners these days its the only style of shoe that looks decent with tight fitting clothes.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2017
  9. da hen

    da hen

    3,583
    1,717
    Joined
    May 1, 2002
    Bo was the greatest athlete of the modern era, he didn't need to wit or charm which he did have plenty of.

    He was a true phenomenon, if you didn't live it you won't understand it.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2017
  10. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
    you know what bugs me about this site?people always attack ur age as if you don't know enough or weren't around. for the record i am old enough to remember bo and deion and there was no comparison in terms of personality.

    nuclear90 was trying to make the point that personality sells kicks and maybe to some extent it does...

    but people also care about design,colorway,hype,price etc.

    victor cruz and darrelle revis had cross trainers a few years back and nobody cared because trends change. back in the 90s everyone had baggy jeans baggy shirts and bulky shoes everything looked uniform .nowadays cross trainers(and most shoes look like boats)being wore with tight pants.

    please explain to me another reason runners have seen so much love over the past 7/8 years?
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2017
  11. nuclear90

    nuclear90

    5,067
    1,203
    Joined
    Jun 12, 2014
    Blame the hipsters.

    I like a chunky shoe myself.
     
    pendemic likes this.
  12. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
    i think the new logo is dope ,only good thing about the retro.
     
  13. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
     
  14. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
     
  15. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
    these joints are mad ill and 20$ cheaper than the regular dt1s,they should of brought these back!
     
  16. lexluthor

    lexluthor

    1,031
    419
    Joined
    Oct 15, 2012
    Why are people complaining about the new logo...that's the same logo that was on the retros from a couple of years ago...Prime is signed to under armour right now so of course they aren't gonna use his OG logo
     
  17. Hahahaha

    Hahahaha formerly ballerific703

    38,209
    11,958
    Joined
    Dec 15, 2004
    That logo, material and strap is all trash.



    I wanted those Pro Bowl joints so ****** bad as a kid. Can't believe Nike has done 100 wack colors and hasn't done the Pro Bowl joints.
     
  18. ninjahood

    ninjahood

    57,694
    12,871
    Joined
    Aug 2, 2004
    true.

    just seen em now, they're alright.

    they switched da strap to leather and no Diamond turf deion logos, but still decent if u don't already have em.
     
    lexluthor likes this.
  19. SC kid

    SC kid

    34,593
    42,050
    Joined
    Apr 16, 2004
    These are selling well
     
  20. ninjahood

    ninjahood

    57,694
    12,871
    Joined
    Aug 2, 2004
    $115 will to that.
     
  21. pendemic

    pendemic

    721
    93
    Joined
    Jan 5, 2011
    or these
     
  22. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
     
  23. burklinsfienest

    burklinsfienest

    605
    331
    Joined
    Apr 19, 2013
    some differences i have noticed,the ogs are a bit taller. all the retros have been more like mids the ogs were close to being hi tops.

    paint job is reversed on all the retros.

    the retros feature red stitching instead of gold and the og falcons cw never had a patch stitched in the pull tab(only the emerald cw did)

    logo is different ,the 04/05 retro had the same logo but colors were different

    leather mudguard stops just shy of rubber toe cap,on the retros it goes all the way to the toe cap.

    ogs had more of a square shaped strap,the retros are a bit wider more rectangle shaped.

    the leather was real i can only assume the retros are not.
     
    dfacedxa likes this.
  24. pendemic

    pendemic

    721
    93
    Joined
    Jan 5, 2011
    OMG look at the cowhide on those beauties! The swoosh on the strap is bigger than the 04/05 retros.

    The differences in the color swapping is a little annoying
     
  25. twinz

    twinz

    227
    68
    Joined
    Dec 24, 2012
    I'll pass on these hopefully they'll do the black/purple