Nike SB Appetite For Destruction Dunk Low 2008

[stresseddesserts]

kinda coo. but im coo.

 

[mayhemgatz]

EZ Passing these

 

[colorway]

 

[stillmatic]

man i hate paxil rose

 

[raichu098]

they look alright 4 retail.

 

[prez t]

gross

 

[rolla808]

Not bad looking.

 

[sickkickgame23]

They have that terrible*!#@ Dunk Low CL quality with the tumbled leather toebox and that paper thin full grain suede. This might be one of those HO HUMreleases like the Deck Highs....those are EVERYWHERE!!!! But for whatever reason, ppl tend to cop ugly SB's with frequency.

 

[packersgotme]

pass...........

 

[vidasman]

Im totally ready to pick those up,, when is RD?? and give us more info please

 

[kampoutkid]

they're SBs...they might have a release month instead of a date

 

[sylvestermcgrizzly]

i like the materials used...but the colors arent of my liking

 

[kickmatic23]

Originally Posted by cOlorWay

agree

 

[bigsupa]

THEY LOOK LIKE A NIKEID PAIR GONE BAD

 

[bigsupa]

THEY LOOK LIKE A NIKEID PAIR GONE BAD

 

[nyckone]

Originally Posted by kevin2nd

that wasn't even the real cover of the appetite for destruction album. the original artwork was done by robert williams - here's the real one (i censored it)

i had that t-shirt in elementary school when it came out. man, that was a long time ago. i was always afraid to wear it w/o a jacket cuz of the rapescene.

 

[jimmy digital]

theyre ok. not as horrid as other sb's. i can say that with confidence

 

[superflyinchopstickninja]

guns n roses

 

[j g e t]

Very Nice

 

[czur1127]

need more pics but I like what i c

 

[0ren ishii]

oh how the mighty have fallen...

 

[the high school graduate]

Originally Posted by Kickmatic23

Originally Posted by cOlorWay

agree

the catalog pics were so much better than these

 

[dunknforce]

not so bad