NYC Subways possibly getting cellphone service and Wi-fi?

2,421
43
Joined
Sep 21, 2002
[h1]via Gawker:
[/h1][h1]Our Worst Nightmare Realized: Subway Stations and Tracks To Have Cell Service, Wi-Fi[/h1]
340x_custom_1280504240462_wtrain.jpg
Notonly will the city's subway stations be rigged to support your handheldelectronic devices, but chatty citizens will be allowed to make callsin between stops, too. Is there anything worse than this?

The MTA reached a deal with a company called Transit Wirelessthree years ago to enable cell phone service in subway stations, butthe firm never proceeded with the plans. Now it's back on the frontburner, apparently, and the plans are even more ambitious than beforeconsidering they're planning to install both phone signal and internet accessunderground. And where the stops are close enough together—and thetunnels are wider—riders should have coverage during their entireunderground journey, says an official from Q-Wireless, one of the fourcompanies working with Transit Wireless to install the subterraneantransmissions. This is a travesty. For many people the subway is theonly place to not only get away from the nagging of your own iPhone orDroid, but also to end all the chattering, inane conversations of yourfellow citizens.

Under the current deal, Transit Wireless has two more years toinstall the technology in six test stations and then eight years towire all 277 subway stations. Cell phonesin stations we can kind of understand, but allowing people to haveconversations while commuting may bring about the end civilization aswe know it. And, really, why does the subway need wi-fi? So that youcan download porn onto your iPad on the 6 Train? Really? Everyone knowsthe subway is for jerking off while looking at real people. Come on!

8in7.jpg
 
[h1]via Gawker:
[/h1][h1]Our Worst Nightmare Realized: Subway Stations and Tracks To Have Cell Service, Wi-Fi[/h1]
340x_custom_1280504240462_wtrain.jpg
Notonly will the city's subway stations be rigged to support your handheldelectronic devices, but chatty citizens will be allowed to make callsin between stops, too. Is there anything worse than this?

The MTA reached a deal with a company called Transit Wirelessthree years ago to enable cell phone service in subway stations, butthe firm never proceeded with the plans. Now it's back on the frontburner, apparently, and the plans are even more ambitious than beforeconsidering they're planning to install both phone signal and internet accessunderground. And where the stops are close enough together—and thetunnels are wider—riders should have coverage during their entireunderground journey, says an official from Q-Wireless, one of the fourcompanies working with Transit Wireless to install the subterraneantransmissions. This is a travesty. For many people the subway is theonly place to not only get away from the nagging of your own iPhone orDroid, but also to end all the chattering, inane conversations of yourfellow citizens.

Under the current deal, Transit Wireless has two more years toinstall the technology in six test stations and then eight years towire all 277 subway stations. Cell phonesin stations we can kind of understand, but allowing people to haveconversations while commuting may bring about the end civilization aswe know it. And, really, why does the subway need wi-fi? So that youcan download porn onto your iPad on the 6 Train? Really? Everyone knowsthe subway is for jerking off while looking at real people. Come on!

8in7.jpg
 
I always thought there was no cell coverage because they were afraid of cell phone detonated bombs.
idk.
 
I always thought there was no cell coverage because they were afraid of cell phone detonated bombs.
idk.
 
Years back my mom told me that this is why there has been so much construction and service disruptions going on and I completely wrote her off
If true I feel like an @%* now
 
Years back my mom told me that this is why there has been so much construction and service disruptions going on and I completely wrote her off
If true I feel like an @%* now
 
smfh ... i can deal w/ wifi ... (not everyone will be using skype) but %%*#% w/ cell service ... i was just complaining on the way home about some guy yelling on his phone over the bridge ...
 
smfh ... i can deal w/ wifi ... (not everyone will be using skype) but %%*#% w/ cell service ... i was just complaining on the way home about some guy yelling on his phone over the bridge ...
 
Originally Posted by JoseBronx

cosign, just another excuse to rise the fare to $3
sick.gif



I thought the MTA was losing money and now they wanna go ahead and do this %+@%?
smh.gif
smh.gif
smh.gif


Everything is corrupt these days I swear
smh.gif


Originally Posted by airforce416

pimp.gif
cant wait to pay $4.25 per ride because of this. Bet they'll start charging for transfers too
pimp.gif
pimp.gif
pimp.gif

sick.gif
sick.gif
sick.gif


Ugh I dont even want to think about this possibility.

If this happens, never again will I $!@% with the MTA. Ill take my chances trying to find parking in the city.
 
Originally Posted by JoseBronx

cosign, just another excuse to rise the fare to $3
sick.gif



I thought the MTA was losing money and now they wanna go ahead and do this %+@%?
smh.gif
smh.gif
smh.gif


Everything is corrupt these days I swear
smh.gif


Originally Posted by airforce416

pimp.gif
cant wait to pay $4.25 per ride because of this. Bet they'll start charging for transfers too
pimp.gif
pimp.gif
pimp.gif

sick.gif
sick.gif
sick.gif


Ugh I dont even want to think about this possibility.

If this happens, never again will I $!@% with the MTA. Ill take my chances trying to find parking in the city.
 
isnt this some kind of security risk? terrorist  are going to have a easier

time detonating a bomb underground 
 
isnt this some kind of security risk? terrorist  are going to have a easier

time detonating a bomb underground 
 
Back
Top Bottom