OF (Not Odd Future) Says "No" to Explicit Content

30,641
61,672
Joined
Nov 16, 2018
They are just ****ting the on the very same ppl that brought eyes to their company. Not even just eyes, the sex workers is that companies foundation. Not to mention, it created safer space for a lot them who otherwise would've been out on the streets. This is simply ****ed.

“In order to ensure the long-term sustainability of our platform, and the continue to host an inclusive community of creators and fans, we must evolve our content guidelines,” ******** said.

******** has attracted more than 130 million users by giving online creators a platform to charge their fans for photos and videos. Many of its most-popular creators post nude photos and videos, and it has been praised for giving sex workers a safer place to do their jobs"

 

jpzx

Supporter
38,848
10,560
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
I don’t care never been close to being involved with this whole shabang, but yeah seems like a bad idea to me
 
35,728
32,466
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
As I never blamed women for doing OF, I wanna say I feel bad for the women but…I don’t. Good. You wanna be a actress/stripper be an actress/stripper, can’t have it both ways.

I think it’s funny how America can’t make up its mind about sex work.
 
8,132
7,681
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
As I never blamed women for doing OF, I wanna say I feel bad for the women but…I don’t. Good. You wanna be a actress/stripper be an actress/stripper, can’t have it both ways.
Damn. That's some hateful stuff bruh. If that's how they made their paper, so let it be done. Why does the method matter. Changing up the rules now is an oppressive move by the company.
 
140,634
110,808
Joined
Oct 13, 2001
You wanna be a actress/stripper be an actress/stripper, can’t have it both ways.

I wonder if OF content creators would call themselves strippers.

Technically, wouldn't they be? Just on the virtual side?
 
35,728
32,466
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
Damn. That's some hateful stuff bruh. If that's how they made their paper, so let it be done. Why does the method matter. Changing up the rules now is an oppressive move by the company.
Not really. I already said I don’t knock them for doing it but it was a stupid medium for stupid men. Why pay to watch when there a terabytes of free stuff? **** half that stuff would get “leaked” anyway. That’s why it eventually turned into women ripping dudes off.
 
29,060
66,112
Joined
Jul 18, 2013


anigif_sub-buzz-25972-1479741401-2.gif
 
8,132
7,681
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Not really. I already said I don’t knock them for doing it but it was a stupid medium for stupid men. Why pay to watch when there a terabytes of free stuff? **** half that stuff would get “leaked” anyway. That’s why it eventually turned into women ripping dudes off.
So just because you wouldn't pay for it means no one else should? That's now how commerce works papi. Any woman creating porn through this platform deserves to get paid whatever the subscribers are willing to pay. It's a two-way transaction. Why does one painting cost more than another? I'll never know because art is subjective and if someone believes it's worth x amount of their money then what business is it of mine.
 
8,132
7,681
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Companies don’t want to be associated with an internet prostitution website. Only fans can find other financial backing but they won’t. It’ll be funny to see these plastic hoochies scramble to the next thing :lol:
This is a sad day for entrepreneurship. It's an even sadder day for women who are still being shamed for their chosen line of work.
 
19,856
15,919
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Companies don’t want to be associated with an internet prostitution website. Only fans can find other financial backing but they won’t. It’ll be funny to see these plastic hoochies scramble to the next thing :lol:

I figured this just means there'll be a new platform to blow up soon. Then rinse & repeat in a few years when they're in the same predicament with financial partners.
 
35,728
32,466
Joined
Oct 8, 2002
So just because you wouldn't pay for it means no one else should? That's now how commerce works papi. Any woman creating porn through this platform deserves to get paid whatever the subscribers are willing to pay. It's a two-way transaction. Why does one painting cost more than another? I'll never know because art is subjective and if someone believes it's worth x amount of their money then what business is it of mine.
Art is subject but something aren’t. I don’t think no one else should pay the same way I think no one should pay 75k for a 20 Honda Civic. It’s just stupid. In fact, let’s put this discussion on hold until we know women even give a ****. You think you doing the right thing, them women knew OF was a lick. The lick has dried up.
 

Hank Scorpio

Supporter
10,320
7,020
Joined
May 8, 2012
:lol: No more Covid checks, Unemployment bonus is over and no more only fans :lol:. They need to get that retail job back. The fun is over

I think is the genesis of all the "hate" for people who came up from OF.

A lot of people did very well for themselves during Covid. I think amongst all the things we lost from Covid, a sizeable part of the population had tremendous financial gains.

I do agree with the person who said America needs to decided where we stand on sex work. As long as we have those Evangelics who vote politicians into office, we won't ever truly embrace sex workers.
 
Top Bottom