- Jun 28, 2004
- 7,203
- 17,658
these talking points are highly influential. they give everyone an excuse not to do something substantive.
it's a serious problem, these ideas need to be discredited. because people believe in it.
for example, the idea that immigrants make the country poorer. is wildly believed by many people. because it sounds believable.
even tho hardcore immigration restrictionist are a relatively small percentage of the population.
I suppose my contention is that incumbent homeowners in North America are petty investors and will act to preserve the value of their investment (or so they think. High density near SFHs tends to make said homes, incredibly valuable).
Their material interests are what animates their NIMBYism and they “left-wash” away their NIMBYism (and the misanthropic reasoning behind it all).
If those incumbent homeowners didn’t have the words and phrases created by a tiny clique of degenerate, downtown, stoners, who are a mere slice of the overall left, (and an even smaller slice of America’s urban electorate) those homeowners would use technical rhetoric (there’s not enough infrastructure, I here a lot) or out right reactionary rhetoric (I don’t want apartments dwellers in my daughter’s school).
The base motivating force is that they are petty investors not that they are leftists. They just happen to left-wash their selfishness by making it about some principled opposition to real estate capital making a profit.
IMO you’re focusing on how the machine is painted rather than the machine itself.