- 2,270
- 2,702
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2006
Yeah, either that or the other way around—civil religion as a form of or particular element of nationalism/cultural hegemony. In all instances, historical phenomena are reified as transhistorical and above question, much less reproach. And this functions to obscure both the interests and stakes involved as well as the basic notion that things could possibly be different.Do you mean framing nationalism/cultural hegemony as a civil religion? Good question. I don't know.
My joke about "there is no alternative" in my last post was an allusion to Margaret Thatcher's (in)famous quote declaring the ultimate victory of neoliberalism that speaks to this dynamic, as well. To use the civil religion framing, we have been programmed to worship at the altar of the market.
Last edited: