- 145,907
- 191,749
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
"race neutral"
heh
"race neutral"
heh
"race neutral"
heh
I always wonder what type of conversations people like HER have with their (black) families.
these people sold their souls already. I doubt that they even have family or in good relations.I always wonder what type of conversations people like HER have with their (black) families.
when you talk about Tucker Carlson, there is no such thing as neutrality and that is pretty much what it is. a rotten apple is a rotten apple. to give justification to a rotten apple is like putting that rotten thing among the rest. the problem that we have is that in this modern age, we are trying to justify everything eventhough it shouldn't be. that is why criminals roam free.She did not say that Tucker Carlson is not a white supremacist.
She has been saying that Carlson says white supremacist things through an ostensibly race neutral lens, it causes liberals to overreach, and a neutral observer will think that liberals are being unfair to Carlson which further allows Carlson to push white supremacy, through an ostensibly race neutral lens and that turns this neutral observer towards Carlson and away from liberals and their arguments.
Now, I think she’s over thinking this and that there are few, if any, genuinely neutral observers out there whose thought process goes how she described. So it’s a bad take by BJG. But she’s not co-signing Carlson’s genocidal message, as this cynically edited clip implies.
when you talk about Tucker Carlson, there is no such thing as neutrality and that is pretty much what it is. a rotten apple is a rotten apple. to give justification to a rotten apple is like putting that rotten thing among the rest. the problem that we have is that in this modern age, we are trying to justify everything eventhough it shouldn't be. that is why criminals roam free.
She did not say that Tucker Carlson is not a white supremacist.
She has been saying that Carlson says white supremacist things through an ostensibly race neutral lens, it causes liberals to overreach, and a neutral observer will think that liberals are being unfair to Carlson which further allows Carlson to push white supremacy, through an ostensibly race neutral lens and that turns this neutral observer towards Carlson and away from liberals and their arguments.
Now, I think she’s over thinking this and that there are few, if any, genuinely neutral observers out there whose thought process goes how she described. So it’s a bad take by BJG. But she’s not co-signing Carlson’s genocidal message, as this cynically edited clip implies.
Honestly. This but black.