no, you're not. i can't stand the cheap looking hyperfuse. i will not be buying the IX if they are hyperfuse. so long lebron line.
i already have one foot out the door. not only with the lack of colorways they give us(see the kobe line), but also with this hyperfuse junk they are feeding us, i will look elsewhere for a top notch basketball sneaker that also has a nice looking style without looking cheap.
Yup. Same here. Lighter shoes, I understand the need for them, but really? Hyperfuse? It's like they cut out a bunch of random shaped pieces on the upper of the shoe and then hit you with a price increase because of the "technology" of it. Give me my damn leather that will be durable and last. How can you charge $165 for a shoe with less materials?Originally Posted by spoonmanofthehour
no, you're not. i can't stand the cheap looking hyperfuse. i will not be buying the IX if they are hyperfuse. so long lebron line.
flywire and hyperfuse, that's all we will see in the future with nike. cheap looking garbage. i'm already over both of them. i miss real leather shoes of the 80's and 90's.
Heres the thing, 90% of the NTers that buy lebrons, buy them for the looks.Originally Posted by Zero 0123
Yup. Same here. Lighter shoes, I understand the need for them, but really? Hyperfuse? It's like they cut out a bunch of random shaped pieces on the upper of the shoe and then hit you with a price increase because of the "technology" of it. Give me my damn leather that will be durable and last. How can you charge $165 for a shoe with less materials?Originally Posted by spoonmanofthehour
no, you're not. i can't stand the cheap looking hyperfuse. i will not be buying the IX if they are hyperfuse. so long lebron line.
flywire and hyperfuse, that's all we will see in the future with nike. cheap looking garbage. i'm already over both of them. i miss real leather shoes of the 80's and 90's.
Unless the design is amazing, I will not be participating in the debacle. Look at the Jordan 2011 and the Kobe line. They don't use hyperfuse and are still very light and amazing for hooping in.
Wouldnt want LeBrons sig line to be good for that now would we.Originally Posted by LBJ23navo
SMH at hyperfuse techonlogy.. These would strictly be for balling
Originally Posted by best hands in the game
Heres the thing, 90% of the NTers that buy lebrons, buy them for the looks.Originally Posted by Zero 0123
Yup. Same here. Lighter shoes, I understand the need for them, but really? Hyperfuse? It's like they cut out a bunch of random shaped pieces on the upper of the shoe and then hit you with a price increase because of the "technology" of it. Give me my damn leather that will be durable and last. How can you charge $165 for a shoe with less materials?Originally Posted by spoonmanofthehour
no, you're not. i can't stand the cheap looking hyperfuse. i will not be buying the IX if they are hyperfuse. so long lebron line.
flywire and hyperfuse, that's all we will see in the future with nike. cheap looking garbage. i'm already over both of them. i miss real leather shoes of the 80's and 90's.
Unless the design is amazing, I will not be participating in the debacle. Look at the Jordan 2011 and the Kobe line. They don't use hyperfuse and are still very light and amazing for hooping in.
these are basketball shoes. want a casual shoe? go elsewhere.
i like where the lebron line is heading. the VII was sick aesthetically, but the VII ps was able to stay looking good and add great performance. VIII is great is both aspects too. cant wait to try the V3 for basketball.
