Ohio takes another L. how far american education has fallen.

544
279
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
http://www.good.is/post/t...el-honors-english-class/


Parents paying $19,584 a year for their kids to attend Ohio State University might not be thrilled. Twilight is required reading for English 261H, a spring 2011 honors "introduction to fiction" course.

According to Associate Professor Amanpal Garcha's syllabus, the class will read and discuss "important, influential narratives about the supernatural—Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Henry James’ The Turn of the Screw, and Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight as well a few minor works."

James, Shelley, and Stoker may be turning in their graves sharing the bill with Stephanie Meyer. However, serious literary analysis is going to be attempted. The class will explore "the way fiction’s seductiveness is tied to other potentially dangerous attractions."

This is not the first instance of Twilight being offered at the college level—and certainly not the first time pop culture has made an appearance in a college class. But this is also a time when the practical payoff of an undergraduate education is being reevaluated. Multiple studies are questioning the value of college, employers complain that kids coming out of school aren't prepared for the workforce, and student loan debt is through the roof. In that context, it's worth asking whether students really need to be spending their time (and money) studying Twilight.

That said, as much as I dislike Twilight (I tried to read the book and just couldn't get into the love story between "heroine" Bella Swan and sparkly vampire Edward Cullen) including it on the syllabus might get students interested in Bram Stoker, Mary Shelley, and Henry James, and that can't be all bad.
 
http://www.good.is/post/t...el-honors-english-class/


Parents paying $19,584 a year for their kids to attend Ohio State University might not be thrilled. Twilight is required reading for English 261H, a spring 2011 honors "introduction to fiction" course.

According to Associate Professor Amanpal Garcha's syllabus, the class will read and discuss "important, influential narratives about the supernatural—Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, Bram Stoker’s Dracula, Henry James’ The Turn of the Screw, and Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight as well a few minor works."

James, Shelley, and Stoker may be turning in their graves sharing the bill with Stephanie Meyer. However, serious literary analysis is going to be attempted. The class will explore "the way fiction’s seductiveness is tied to other potentially dangerous attractions."

This is not the first instance of Twilight being offered at the college level—and certainly not the first time pop culture has made an appearance in a college class. But this is also a time when the practical payoff of an undergraduate education is being reevaluated. Multiple studies are questioning the value of college, employers complain that kids coming out of school aren't prepared for the workforce, and student loan debt is through the roof. In that context, it's worth asking whether students really need to be spending their time (and money) studying Twilight.

That said, as much as I dislike Twilight (I tried to read the book and just couldn't get into the love story between "heroine" Bella Swan and sparkly vampire Edward Cullen) including it on the syllabus might get students interested in Bram Stoker, Mary Shelley, and Henry James, and that can't be all bad.
 
Another Ohio joke.... 
30t6p3b.gif
 
for my popular culture studies (2nd year english course) we had to read twilight too... its not that big of a deal... where do you goto uni?
 
for my popular culture studies (2nd year english course) we had to read twilight too... its not that big of a deal... where do you goto uni?
 
I had to write a 5 pg. paper analyzing snow white in college. It's college bro.
 
I had to write a 5 pg. paper analyzing snow white in college. It's college bro.
 
[h1]America's Most Miserable Cities

[/h1]
Last year's most miserable city, Cleveland, fell back to No. 10 this year despite the stomach punch delivered by LeBron James when he announced his exit from Cleveland on national television last summer. Cleveland's unemployment rate rose slightly in 2010 to an average of 9.3%, but the city's unemployment rank improved relative to other cities, thanks to soaring job losses across the U.S. Cleveland benefited from a housing market that never overheated and therefore hasn't crashed as much as many other metros. Yet Cleveland was the only city to rank in the bottom half of each of the 10 categories we considered.

[url=http://www.forbes.com/2011/02/02/stockton-miami-cleveland-business-washington-miserable-cities.html]http://www.forbes.com/201...on-miserable-cities.html[/url]
 
[h1]America's Most Miserable Cities

[/h1]
Last year's most miserable city, Cleveland, fell back to No. 10 this year despite the stomach punch delivered by LeBron James when he announced his exit from Cleveland on national television last summer. Cleveland's unemployment rate rose slightly in 2010 to an average of 9.3%, but the city's unemployment rank improved relative to other cities, thanks to soaring job losses across the U.S. Cleveland benefited from a housing market that never overheated and therefore hasn't crashed as much as many other metros. Yet Cleveland was the only city to rank in the bottom half of each of the 10 categories we considered.

[url=http://www.forbes.com/2011/02/02/stockton-miami-cleveland-business-washington-miserable-cities.html]http://www.forbes.com/201...on-miserable-cities.html[/url]
 
Back
Top Bottom