PC -- DS Jordan Concord retro 2000 -- HELP!!

Discussion in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' started by hotbutter, Dec 18, 2009.

  1. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    just as title states how much is too much to spend on a pair of DS Concords size 10. soles are still pretty icy for pair from 2000.

    [​IMG][​IMG]
     
  2. xjordanhead

    xjordanhead

    595
    10
    Joined
    Oct 6, 2009
    Wow All That Patent is Nice. Plus icey soles. Man those are nice.
    Imo I would say atleast 400 bro. 400+
     
  3. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    WOW ... 400 really?? and for those whove had experience with the dmps. from pics. quality looks on point. you guys think i should just find a pair of dmps >retros 2001?? from my p.o.v, dmp = icier soles + cheaper

    how much for ds dmp xi's??
     
  4. davey5737

    davey5737

    1,855
    111
    Joined
    Jun 11, 2003
    ^^around 300 id say, id go with the 00's though if you could, those are super clean and are real concords (though i doubt anyone will be looking at thesoles)
     
  5. aphexacid

    aphexacid

    2,742
    126
    Joined
    Nov 20, 2007
    $400

    Why would you want DMP's if you can get these?
     
  6. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    ^^ b/c dmps have ICY soles? and Cheaper. arent the dmp xi shape and materials very close if not exactly alike the retro 2000's above?
     
  7. aphexacid

    aphexacid

    2,742
    126
    Joined
    Nov 20, 2007
    Right, so the DMP's will stay eternally icy?
     
  8. xjordanhead

    xjordanhead

    595
    10
    Joined
    Oct 6, 2009
    Yea go with the retros. Retros>DMPs. Dmps are a great shoe but more heads would turn to the retro.
     
  9. freshdunks44

    freshdunks44

    449
    10
    Joined
    Apr 8, 2008

    Agreed. 350+
     
  10. jordanhead21

    jordanhead21

    2,620
    10
    Joined
    Jun 6, 2009
    You could always seaglow those too if you want, I would def get these over the DMP XI's. The bottom of the shoe isn't the most important thing.
     
  11. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    overwhelmingly niketalk sides with the retros > dmps. REASONS other than theyre more limited?? is the only reason b/c theyre mroe "exclusive"?
     
  12. jordanhead21

    jordanhead21

    2,620
    10
    Joined
    Jun 6, 2009
    The retros arent limited at all, that would be the DMP. If you really want an icey sole and a shoe because its limited then you should buy the DMP. The solesnot going to stay icey if you actually wear them. People are saying to get the retros because they are getting harder and harder to find, the DMP shoes will bearound for a while due to the high asking prices. Just my opinion
     
  13. thefreshestwhiteboy301

    thefreshestwhiteboy301

    493
    10
    Joined
    Jun 19, 2009
    cop both that would be [​IMG]
     
  14. eebs7eez

    eebs7eez

    2,863
    61
    Joined
    Jul 15, 2008
    nt picks the retro because it`s a perfectly well-executed retro of an original colourway. the dmp is close to an original, but the overall mentality here isbased on originality and quality. go with the 2000`s
     
  15. sneakerfan93

    sneakerfan93

    2,528
    10
    Joined
    May 16, 2009
    '00 retros are better quality than DMPs, but I like DMPS more because of the gold jumpman and icier sole. Icier sole means it takes longer toyellow[​IMG] Also, they're cheaper than the retros.
    But just get what you feel like getting more[​IMG]
     
  16. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    thanks for all the input. i ended up coppin the retros 00 for $300 shippd. mightve gone with the dmps, but you all know how difficult it is to find a pair ofconcords-- retro or dmps, for a reasonable price.

    gna be my HOLIEST OF HOLY GRAILS, always awanted a pair of concords, owned 3 pairs of jams + 1bred.

    interesting note is that, im gna end up selling my retro GRAPE V's to pay for these lol

    so to all that are interested in a size 10.5 LITERALLY worn once grapes LMK
     
  17. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    btw 300 shippd = good/ bad/ or average price for DS size 10 ?
     
  18. caliking03

    caliking03

    358
    10
    Joined
    Dec 7, 2007
    350 for these i would say
     
  19. llttfullest1

    llttfullest1

    33
    10
    Joined
    Dec 10, 2004
    wow good price man those 2000s were icy, I would say they were easily worth 350+
    The DMPs are also very pricey as they were very limited and their was crazy hype about those,
    so Ill say DS DMP XIs can easily go for 375-425
     
  20. jordanhead21

    jordanhead21

    2,620
    10
    Joined
    Jun 6, 2009
    Now the real question is, are you going to wear them or spend 300 on something to stare at?
     
  21. hotbutter

    hotbutter

    1,511
    32
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2007
    DEF. gona wear them. although as i get older, i switch it from bball shoe to casual shoe from time to time. and esp with my ultra-heat/grails, i like tooccasionally wear them to preserve the life. hopefully 10 yrs from now ill still have all my xi's in rotation.
     
  22. airjordanxviii

    airjordanxviii

    1,757
    24
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2008

    STEAL
     
  23. airrizzy33

    airrizzy33

    78
    10
    Joined
    Aug 31, 2009
    i just got the XI and VI DMP for chrstmas and am absolutely in love. Concords were my fav of all time until now. Love the gold on the XI. Those Concords inquestion look well worth every penny of $400 IMO
     
  24. airrizzy33

    airrizzy33

    78
    10
    Joined
    Aug 31, 2009

    100% agreed! its all about the rotation!