- 11,910
- 515
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2008
Pope is the biggest pimp on planet earth.
The clergy are all scum.
The Catholic church is a joke.
The clergy are all scum.
The Catholic church is a joke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
listen if i accept timcity, i'll accept you. you looking just liek the people you bashingOriginally Posted by sillyputty
Yeah, it was a joke when you thought you had a point about people using science to disprove fallacious arguments.Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
relax guy it was a joke.Originally Posted by sillyputty
I'm not sure if you realized...this isn't about science...its about RAPING WOMEN AND CHILDREN.
HELLO?!
Just stop while you're behind.
theses an old saying about the humor of rape and clowns
Go back to defending pedophiles like you've been doing in here.
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
LOL at these dudes who can't form their own thoughts religious extremists just as bad as atheist extremists.
Hold up man.Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
LOL at these dudes who can't form their own thoughts religious extremists just as bad as atheist extremists.
Seriously.
Originally Posted by sillyputty
what you're doing is a logical fallacy called the "No True Scotsman." Look into it and what it means.Originally Posted by throwedyonasb
i dont even wanna get these so called Christians heated but the catholic church is the beast.
thats why these fools are always around evil.. you rarely hear this pop up among righteous people.
Apparently you can't ole i only post charts graphs articles and no original ideas but its okay cuz i completely agree with these opinions ole egon from ghostbusters science bwoi.Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
Do you struggle with seeing if thats right or wrong? Or can you not think for yourself?
Originally Posted by throwedyonasb
Originally Posted by sillyputty
what you're doing is a logical fallacy called the "No True Scotsman." Look into it and what it means.Originally Posted by throwedyonasb
i dont even wanna get these so called Christians heated but the catholic church is the beast.
thats why these fools are always around evil.. you rarely hear this pop up among righteous people.
i hear you but thats not the case with me... i was born an Ethiopian orthodox, by the time i was in high school i hated religion and believed its what divided the people on this earth. but now my beliefs are different; i definitely believe in a higher power "God" and i believe life is about love and its like a test to separate the righteous from the evil. i definitely believe that the catholics stole the "word" from blessed individuals and manipulated it to the point where they were being worshiped as they were doing the devils work.
got the whole world living for the wrong reasons... people living for recognition from other individuals, just to boost their egos.
o well *proceeds to roll one up*
Originally Posted by sillyputty
Hold up man.Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
LOL at these dudes who can't form their own thoughts religious extremists just as bad as atheist extremists.
Seriously.
Just hold up.
We're talking about raping kids here.
Molesting kids.
Harassing women.
Under the pretense of your "god"
Lets get one thing straight here.
We're not talking about whether or not your god exists.
We're not talking about which religion is right or wrong.
We're talking about rape, molestation, and harassment.
Twist the argument how you want, but to if it makes me an "extremist" because I want to see some "religious figure" in white robes tried in a court for his complicity in paying off, eliminating evidence of, deferring responsibility of the sexual abuse of women and children, I WILL BE THAT AND WEAR THAT BADGE PROUDLY.
There is no in-between here.
You either support the pope in spite of these crimes or you want to see the pope take responsibility as the figure head for these injustices. Thats ALL.
This talk about "forming my own opinion" is ridiculous.
What OPINION do I need to form? You're making it seem like this is a hard question to answer.
I don't like little kids getting taken advantage of. Point. Period.
Do you struggle with seeing if thats right or wrong? Or can you not think for yourself?
Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by sillyputty
Hold up man.Originally Posted by rashi
Seriously.
Just hold up.
We're talking about raping kids here.
Molesting kids.
Harassing women.
Under the pretense of your "god"
Lets get one thing straight here.
We're not talking about whether or not your god exists.�
We're not talking about which religion is right or wrong.�
We're talking about rape, molestation, and harassment.
Twist the argument how you want, but to if it makes me an "extremist" because I want to see some "religious figure" in white robes tried in a court for his complicity in paying off, eliminating evidence of, deferring responsibility of the sexual abuse of women and children, I WILL BE THAT AND WEAR THAT BADGE PROUDLY.
There is no�in-between�here.
You either support the pope in spite of these crimes or you want to see the pope take responsibility as the figure head for these injustices. Thats ALL.�
This talk about "forming my own opinion" is ridiculous.�
What OPINION do I need to form? You're making it seem like this is a hard question to answer.
I don't like little kids getting taken advantage of. Point. Period.�
Do you struggle with seeing if thats right or wrong? Or can you not think for yourself?
1. I'm not Christian.
2. What eNPHAN was saying that you people are as passionate against religion as religious fanatics for their own religion. That's it, dude.
Originally Posted by rashi
Originally Posted by sillyputty
Hold up man.Originally Posted by rashi
Seriously.
Just hold up.
We're talking about raping kids here.
Molesting kids.
Harassing women.
Under the pretense of your "god"
Lets get one thing straight here.
We're not talking about whether or not your god exists.�
We're not talking about which religion is right or wrong.�
We're talking about rape, molestation, and harassment.
Twist the argument how you want, but to if it makes me an "extremist" because I want to see some "religious figure" in white robes tried in a court for his complicity in paying off, eliminating evidence of, deferring responsibility of the sexual abuse of women and children, I WILL BE THAT AND WEAR THAT BADGE PROUDLY.
There is no�in-between�here.
You either support the pope in spite of these crimes or you want to see the pope take responsibility as the figure head for these injustices. Thats ALL.�
This talk about "forming my own opinion" is ridiculous.�
What OPINION do I need to form? You're making it seem like this is a hard question to answer.
I don't like little kids getting taken advantage of. Point. Period.�
Do you struggle with seeing if thats right or wrong? Or can you not think for yourself?
1. I'm not Christian.
2. What eNPHAN was saying that you people are as passionate against religion as religious fanatics for their own religion. That's it, dude.
i love it when these intellectual cats get their panties in a bunch. my man starts typing all "proper" and puts himself on that pedestal.Originally Posted by sillyputty
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
Apparently you can't ole i only post charts graphs articles and no original ideas but its okay cuz i completely agree with these opinions ole egon from ghostbusters science bwoi.Originally Posted by sillyputty
Do you struggle with seeing if thats right or wrong? Or can you not think for yourself?
Bruh, the article asked how can a catholic still defend RAPE AND MOLESTATION.
Its the same thing i've been saying.
I only posted the article to lend credence to my argument in a clear and concisely written form.
That article was written LAST year btw. This isn't new by any means.
This is about communication.
How do I know you've even written anything that is posted under your username? or am I supposed to take your misspelled statements and poor sentence structure to indicate it as being solely the best thing you're capable of producing to represent your opinion and username?
In any case, I don't see what we're debating here. I can't understand why this discussion isn't about the pope protecting child rapists but you want to talk about who had the more original argument.
Get out of here with that. You're part of the reason we can't prosecute these monsters because you're worried about something irrelevant, like the size of my font or the weather in wisconsin or something random.
sillyputty wrote:
Ok...but the god you believe in is in line with the christian tradition. You're just picking and choosing. Its called cafeteria/buffet christianity. Get what you want and leave the rest.
It doesn't legitimize your stance.
I have Jamaican heritage...I know about the whole ethiopia and jah and rasta connection...trust me... i know...but none of that:
A. Makes your stance on christianity and faith more real, legitimate, or true
B. addresses or even defends why we shouldn't pursue holding the pope responsible for his actions.
so what are you saying? when did i call myself a christian? when did i say the pope shouldnt be held responsible?
honestly they could give him the death penalty for all i care.
btw you lost me with that cafeteria +!!!**!#.
I post an article by a reputable and credible source as my first post in the tread asking for the pope to be held responsible for child abuse and you have a problem with what exactly?Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
i love it when these intellectual cats get their panties in a bunch. my man starts typing all "proper" and puts himself on that pedestal.Originally Posted by sillyputty
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
Apparently you can't ole i only post charts graphs articles and no original ideas but its okay cuz i completely agree with these opinions ole egon from ghostbusters science bwoi.
Bruh, the article asked how can a catholic still defend RAPE AND MOLESTATION.
Its the same thing i've been saying.
I only posted the article to lend credence to my argument in a clear and concisely written form.
That article was written LAST year btw. This isn't new by any means.
This is about communication.
How do I know you've even written anything that is posted under your username? or am I supposed to take your misspelled statements and poor sentence structure to indicate it as being solely the best thing you're capable of producing to represent your opinion and username?
In any case, I don't see what we're debating here. I can't understand why this discussion isn't about the pope protecting child rapists but you want to talk about who had the more original argument.
Get out of here with that. You're part of the reason we can't prosecute these monsters because you're worried about something irrelevant, like the size of my font or the weather in wisconsin or something random.
i'm part of the reason?
you are. all you do is postulate and complain and cry. you stand at your keyboard citing articles about a truth that we all know about.
you are the reason. keyboard warrior who champions a cause from his chair thinking his witty remarks and credible citations merit change.
you are the problem my friend.
anyone can identify a problem. you have yet to offer any solutions.
my job is to out people like you.
you are much a part of the system as these monsters are.
to poorly cite, since you love citations:
"what does that make you; the good guy?"
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
this guy infers that silence means support. if your not rabble raising liek he is then he thinks you are part of the problem.
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
this guy infers that silence means support. if your not rabble raising liek he is then he thinks you are part of the problem.
Oh word?Originally Posted by Drunken Cow
Sadly, as much as you guys complain, there is no way you can end a religion.
Hopefully justice is served to those who were even part of this.
sillyputty wrote:
Originally Posted by RufioRufioRufio
this guy infers that silence means support. if your not rabble raising liek he is then he thinks you are part of the problem.
Thats not what I said.
You said my opinion was somehow illegitimate because I posted an article. Thats what started this in the first place when all it did was reinforce that the pope needs to be tried for his crimes.
You came at me first and started flying off the handle, yet when I check you on each point you start retreating on your arguments and rewording your phrasing on previous comments.
I did? wow when?
Originally Posted by sillyputty
Again, this isn't about "religion" this is about sexual abuse. It just so happens religion gets used to protect it. Step aside from your bias and do the right thing. Calling me a keyboard warrior doesn't mean anything.
None of the marches and political activism in the last 5 years would not have happened without the internet so sit there and keep talking out of the side of your head. Things are changing and you're about to be on the wrong side of history.