School me on the Foamposites

Discussion in 'Nike' started by p0tat0 5alad, Dec 6, 2007.

  1. p0tat0 5alad

    p0tat0 5alad

    6,053
    10
    Joined
    Jul 14, 2007
    I'm not really familiar with this shoe and want to know whats up? I hear the hotter it gets, the more comfortable because it molds around your foot.
     
  2. shaqrules

    shaqrules

    2,326
    133
    Joined
    Feb 15, 2003
    you may want to ask this in the retro forum. but yeah...the foamposite molds to your feet.
     
  3. ninjahood

    ninjahood

    57,699
    12,872
    Joined
    Aug 2, 2004
    nike only makes it..da best shoes you can ever cop;
     
  4. mp23

    mp23

    1,737
    173
    Joined
    Jul 3, 2004
    It is an extremely thin molded polyurethane, which is a highly-developed synthetic material developed by Nike engineers in conjuction with Daewoo, the samecompany that makes cars and stereos. It was a long process to perfect this material, but out came something that is unprecedented in the shoe market andprovides so good of fit, that you may feel as though it is an extension of your foot. It may feel uncomfortable at first, but it will eventually mold to yourfoot in a way that will make you literally go, "Wow!" Instead of multiple pieces of leather, there is just one whole piece of Foamposite materialthat bathes your foot in a very comfortable shell.
     
  5. 255forlife

    255forlife

    1,709
    10
    Joined
    Jan 28, 2006
    i guess i must be the only one that dislikes foamposite.


    it looks cool but it's heavy and hard.


    always takes a toll on my knees when i ball in them.
     
  6. theadimac

    theadimac

    518
    12
    Joined
    Oct 10, 2005
    foamposites is good stuff, It provides the best fit of any upper you will find.

    But that initial break in period is nasty
     
  7. rawtoon 305

    rawtoon 305 Banned

    264
    10
    Joined
    Nov 5, 2007
    '' i couldn't say it any better ''
     
  8. cwk

    cwk

    786
    20
    Joined
    Jan 15, 2001
    Faomposite is a foam composite that is injected into a mold to from a shoe's upper.
    The strength and pliability helped bring about two advances in shoe design:
    1)new, organic shapes and
    2)the elimination of the midsole (the upper attaches directly to the outsole).
     
  9. rapsa

    rapsa

    1,800
    30
    Joined
    Oct 20, 2006
    ^exactly!
     
  10. eddiehouse5

    eddiehouse5

    2,711
    10
    Joined
    May 4, 2003
    i don't what the big deal is about foamposite. i don't feel that it does a better job than leather.

    i like it though, and the shoe designs that foam has been utilized with have been great to look at and to play in. it's a good alternative to leather, butit's no the end all be all.
     
  11. never wear them

    never wear them

    11,226
    109
    Joined
    May 8, 2006
    IT WAS A BREAKTHROUGH SHOE. One of the greatest shoes of all time. very ahead of its time. strictly for ball but if you ask me. wear it 30x and compare it to ads pair... you wont be able to tell the difference. unless it has a clear sole.
    The shoes are a masterpiece. the most expensive shoe to come out back in 97.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]- foamposite pro
     
  12. midnitegreen

    midnitegreen formerly austin066

    423
    87
    Joined
    Feb 4, 2006
    your knees hurting has nothing to do with the material of the uppers
     
  13. 255forlife

    255forlife

    1,709
    10
    Joined
    Jan 28, 2006
    ^


    when did you get a medical degree?


    all i know is that this week (monday to thursday) i balled in foam pros, 2k4s, flight huaraches, and jordan 2s..


    and the day after i played in the foam pros, my knees hurt. didn't happen any of the other days.
     
  14. chris chicago

    chris chicago

    300
    10
    Joined
    Apr 25, 2003
    I tried on a pair this week. The niketown sales dude and I had a good laugh about how uncomfortable they are brand new. The feel like you've got the tinman's boots on. I guess I'll have to trust y'all that they get comfortable with wear. 200 is out of my price range either way.

    I'm curious, is foam's big advantage durability? I know it's not weight, or out of the box comfort. Do they last forever?
     
  15. cwk

    cwk

    786
    20
    Joined
    Jan 15, 2001
    I worked for NIKE Basketball Research and Development, and in my experience, knee pain, or any other joint pain, is not associated solely with the uppermaterial of a shoe.
    It's usually a result of either insufficient cushioning, an unforgiving playing surface or a bad overall fit.
    Foamposite shoes are generally heavier, requiring slightly more energy to move, making your muscles sore, not your joints.
    As far as durability, I still have two pairs Air Flightposite II KG TB that are like new after several years of regular use.
     
  16. menoforegon

    menoforegon

    234
    11
    Joined
    Nov 26, 2007
    According to coworkers here: [​IMG][​IMG]
    this gentleman knows of what he speaks of.
     
  17. mt3130

    mt3130

    1,312
    10
    Joined
    Jun 12, 2007
     
  18. p0tat0 5alad

    p0tat0 5alad

    6,053
    10
    Joined
    Jul 14, 2007
    are they basically indestrucible? like the Jordan XIIs
     
  19. menoforegon

    menoforegon

    234
    11
    Joined
    Nov 26, 2007
    Foamposite is as lightweight as it could possibly be. The real disadvantage to this type of upper is BREATHABILITY. Because it is a seamless, one-piece upperit doesn't have very much room for heat to dissipate. And also, it is an expensive process because the mold is very expensive. Only used in "highend" footwear.
     
  20. jordan23collecta

    jordan23collecta

    1,535
    10
    Joined
    Oct 27, 2005
     
  21. goosebear10

    goosebear10

    514
    10
    Joined
    Dec 17, 2006
    from my experience fit and overall support is the foamposite's greatest strength.A shoe that is created out of one piece of material not 3 or 4 piecesstitched together enhances the shoe's ability to better support your foot because it's just one piece not a bunch stitched or glued together.The fit isanother strength due to the material's ability to form around the wearer's foot and create as close to a custom fit as possible.The foam pro probablyisnt the best example of how the material was best applied..that in my opinion goes to the flightposite series.Menoforegon was right,in terms of one of thedrawbacks but a couple more is the relatively narrow mold most foamposite based shoes have been made in making it feel like I was breaking my foot while tryingto break in the shoe.The only pairs I actually was able to stand were the flightposite 1 and 2.They hurt the first couple times you wear them..most of the timeI recommend lacing them up as if you were when playing basketball and walk around the mall,low impact activities to slowly break in the shoe before bringing iton court.But after they are broken in the fit is one of the best I have experienced in my 15 some odd years of playing basketball and going through shoes.
     
  22. da hen

    da hen

    3,583
    1,717
    Joined
    May 1, 2002
    The Foamposite One was never meant for Penny. He was visiting headquarters for other business and got a peak at the Foam One prototype, he requested it be his,rest is history.
     
  23. da hen

    da hen

    3,583
    1,717
    Joined
    May 1, 2002
    The Foamposite One was never meant for Penny. He was visiting headquarters for other business and got a peak at the Foam One prototype, he requested it be his,rest is history.
     
  24. aj232kb8

    aj232kb8

    2,008
    10
    Joined
    Apr 6, 2005
    co-sign
     
  25. jman8811

    jman8811

    716
    10
    Joined
    Aug 18, 2004
    What I want to know is why is foam composite material so heavy compared to other materials......