Science has just successfully cloned human DNA...

1,756
794
Joined Apr 27, 2005
Let's say for whatever reason, theres a new breakthrough that allowed humans to be successfully cloned to their peak physical condition. You're super rich, super connected, and super bored. David Stern is your boy, and he says you could pick any person in the world to clone and start a new team. But your team will consists of ONLY that person.

The choice is yours. Who you pickin? Will it be:



Or would you rather have 5 of these guys?


Or maybe you want a team full of
?

How would a team full of any of these guys fair against competition in the NBA? Will they be undeniable champions, or will they flop like fish out of water?
 
18,955
11,253
Joined May 17, 2007
Shaq in his prime I think. if we talking 1-3 years only tho, Shaq never had the extra dedication to really beast like he should've.
If I'm starting for the longhaul I'd probably roll with Mike.
 
1,756
794
Joined Apr 27, 2005
Take in mind your bench will also consists of that player. So you'd be subbing a ____ in for a less tired ____. How about 5 kevin loves? Teams could barely keep one off the glass, how about 3 ?
 
7,513
4,871
Joined Jan 4, 2012
I would make a team full of Jeremy Lin's so people would give the 
even though we're 41-41.







But seriously Magic > All
 
9,400
5,437
Joined Sep 17, 2006
false...


magic guarded a center... on few occasions and suddenly he can consistently guard them? come on now...


five Michael Jordan's will trump all... double team the post if you have to, but having 5 defensive players of the year, and 5 of the greatest scorers of all time would NOT be funny
 
10,371
649
Joined Jan 3, 2011
There are probably hundreds of better choices than Shaq, who is playing positions 1-3 at a level of complete incompetence.
 
1,756
794
Joined Apr 27, 2005
Originally Posted by Kevin Cleveland

There are probably hundreds of better choices than Shaq, who is playing positions 1-3 at a level of complete incompetence.
but do you think the sheer dominance that the 4 and 5 positions would be in, could make up for their lack of production?
 
1,756
794
Joined Apr 27, 2005
id be @#$%ting my pants if im on a fast break and saw 3 lebron james comin after me. help defense and intensity could be matched probably only by a team of jordans.

theres also other great options like scottie or larry.
 
5,287
463
Joined Apr 13, 2007
Originally Posted by MoonMan818

Originally Posted by KB8isCLUTCH

5 lebrons
But who would make shots in the 4th quarter?



this was my exact thought process. 

"Lebron would be a good choice, he can play 1-5 and has a bigger body than most of the league, is fast and agile and can defend like a monster...

...but then we would lose in the 4th quarter. back to the drawing board." 

haha
 
10,371
649
Joined Jan 3, 2011
Originally Posted by GRideBounca11

Originally Posted by Kevin Cleveland

There are probably hundreds of better choices than Shaq, who is playing positions 1-3 at a level of complete incompetence.
but do you think the sheer dominance that the 4 and 5 positions would be in, could make up for their lack of production?
 
352
10
Joined Aug 4, 2004
Against another team of 5 clones, it's MJ every time.

Against a real team (i.e. 5 different guys playing the 5 positions), I'd take 5 Lebrons. MJ is obviously better than Lebron, but in a weird scenario like this, the versatility and court vision become more important if you only had one guy to use. Also I just want to see 3 or 4 Lebrons on a fast break. That would be the Most Devastating Attack in Sports History.
 
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now