Season-long threads and Game threads: DISCUSS

^ For the Warriors Thread, I'm pretty sure we're all cool with the fact that daprescription is the thread starter. Like acidicality said on page 2 of this thread, the Warriors Season Thread was "ran pretty cleanly". There's no egos over here.
And I'd like to add that I miss season threads.

GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS​

Azubuike - Barnes - Belinelli - Biedrins - Croshere - Davis - Ellis​

Harrington - Hudson - Jackson - Lasme - O'Bryant - Perovic - Pietrus - Wright​

 

Season threads you can discuss games, trades, rumors, problems, etc.

Game threads you discuss the game.

Season threads............ please.

TEAMAMFAM
TEAM WARRIORS
TEAM XBOX360​

.:GAMERTAG= chr1scross:.
​

 

Gameday.

NORTHCAROLINATARHEELS​

 

​

 

Pros to Gameday threads - Just a few...

More organized - Topics/Info much more easy to search fro either manually or w/ the search function from EZboard.
Allows two-sided discussion - Discussion from several sources/fan rather than that of one particular team would occur more readily on a game day thread.
Visuals - There aren't threads w/ hundreds of replies/pages taking up space on the 1st page.
More welcoming for the casual fan

Team Longhorns ​

 

Yeah Fanatic15, i totally see what your saying, and agree with some things in there. See, I just want to see the other side of the arguement, since I am for season threads. Most of the replies are "annoying, eyesore, etc..", which doesnt explain why game threads are a better choice. If the Mods/Admins are to make a good decision, I think they should have all the information (pros and cons) on both gameday threads and season threads.

.:: |Team| Toronto| Raptors| ::.​

.:: We Aint Scurred of the C's ::.​

TEAM PRARIE BOYZ​

 

Like I said earlier, discussion on this minor issue had re-opened among the staff, and this is what we're agreed upon as the best option:

 

For a dummy, you make a lot of sense

"You Big Dummy'08."​

 

T E A M N E W Y O R K K N I C K S ​

 

​

 

And I'd like to add that I miss season threads.

GOLDEN STATE WARRIORS​

Azubuike - Barnes - Belinelli - Biedrins - Croshere - Davis - Ellis​

Harrington - Hudson - Jackson - Lasme - O'Bryant - Perovic - Pietrus - Wright​

 

man that's what i've been sayin all along

glad the knicks thread remained untouched. lol

TEAMGIANTS​

TEAMNEWYORKMETS​

TEAMNEWYORKKNICKS​

 

compromise solutions suck like proportional representation.


however, i guess the majority has spoken, although i thought niketalk was an oligarchy, not a democracy.

..with so much personality,
what do you want from me?
i could be by myself and enjoy the company..
but i'd ratherher
​

 

So do we have to make a game thread for every game?

In other words, do comments during an on-going game need to be in a game thread? or can we also discuss it in the season thread?

"And Still..CHI-TOWN'S FINEST, where you at, the whole CITY behind us"​

www.myspace.com/arstyle​

4L8O15S16T23!42​

 

good good, I'm happy with this hybrid.

I think this is the best of both worlds. But I recommend Season Threads should be locked after 20pages.


That's my word

-=Team RealTalk=-​

 

Cool news for all. Thank you to all the mods for listening. I'm now going to go bang my head into a wall for sucking up. :b

MIAMI DOLPHINS

LA LAKERS

CHICAGO CUBS

MIAMI HURRICANES​

 

bring season threads back

TEAMCOWBOYS​

VI..XII..XXVII..XXVIII..XXX......​

"We're workin on the second hand"​

 

I hate this season thread crap

now the first page is gonna be filled with 100+ page mega posts

W....I....L....L....I....A....M....S​

 

^After this initial flood of season threads I am pretty sure many of them won't me maintained throughout the season. People are just excited right now

Team Longhorns ​

 

be careful what you wish for, it just might come true.


remember there are 30 NBA teams, a couple hundred NCAA teams, and however many teams of the boring sports played with small balls.

..with so much personality,
what do you want from me?
i could be by myself and enjoy the company..
but i'd ratherher
​

 

^ #1- Not all team threads will be kept up with.

#2- For NCAA, the divisional threads have proven to be pretty effective (SEC Thread, ACC Thread, etc.)

#3- For the small sports you're talking about (for example, tennis), there's no need to have a thread for each entity (Federer, Roddick, Blake, etc.). A thread for the entire sport will suffice when the time comes.

---

---

And... in an attempt to discourage people from mistaking these season/news threads from game threads, I'll be editing out game info from titles of season/news threads for awhile. Stuff like, "12/6 vs. LAL" (for example) only makes people wonder if this is the season-long thread or the game thread.

Additionally, we would PREFER people indicate something like '07-'08 Season Thread' or '_______s News' in the titles, but that's not a demand or rule or anything.

The point is to just make it clear where the game discussion is and where the season-long discussion is, and not blur the line between the two in the process.

4L8O15S16T23!42 ​

My 5 teams: 1. ANGELS, 2. LAKERS (I grew up on Angels/Lakers games), 3. UK WILDCATS (my wife is from Kentucky), 4. TN TITANS (we married and started our lives together in Tennessee), 5. L.A. SPARKS (WNBA/Sparks fan since Day One). When my teams aren't playing, I'll always show love for these SoCal teams: L.A. CLIPPERS, S.D. PADRES, Anaheim DUCKS, USC TROJANS, S.D. CHARGERS, L.A. AVENGERS, L.A. DODGERS, U.C.L.A. BRUINS, L.A. KINGS, L.A. GALAXY. "This game is in the refrigerator! The door is closed, the lights are out, the eggs are cooling, the butter's gettin hard, and the Jello's jigglin!" -Chick Hearn (R.I.P.)​