- 11,324
- 7,171
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2008
I hope spiderman is in the venom film some how
Ending credit or something
Ending credit or something
SPUMC Thread - RIP STAN LEE - ACROSS THE SPIDERVERSE out now
- 87,735
- 50,125
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Last edited:
- 5,242
- 2,730
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2008
- 87,735
- 50,125
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Nike Jordan
Supporter
- 32,418
- 76,612
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2002
- 87,735
- 50,125
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Interested 
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Phil Lord And Chris Miller Developing Live-Action TV Shows Based On Sony's SPIDER-MAN Characters
During an interview with Deadline, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse writers and producers Phil Lord and Chris Miller confirmed that, "We are developing a handful of live action shows using Sony’s Marvel characters, of which there are like 900 characters."
"We’re figuring out a way to develop the shows so that each are their own unique experience but are also related," Miller continued, pointing to us getting a shared universe on the small screen revolving around these characters. Now, there's no word on who they might be but an alternate version of the wall-crawler is highly likely as are some supporting heroes and villains.
Sony will obviously have to co-ordinate with Marvel Studios to avoid any confusion but the prospect of seeing a different Peter Parker on the small screen is really exciting. Hopefully, that's what we get and not just a number of shows revolving around D-List characters...then again, in the capable hands of Lord and Miller that might not actually be the worst thing that could happen.
"We’ve been talking to a lot of potential teammates for trying to do something not like anything else that’s been done on television," Miller added. "It’ll be a little while before it all comes together and is on the air, but I think it is going to be something really special."
During an interview with Deadline, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse writers and producers Phil Lord and Chris Miller confirmed that, "We are developing a handful of live action shows using Sony’s Marvel characters, of which there are like 900 characters."
"We’re figuring out a way to develop the shows so that each are their own unique experience but are also related," Miller continued, pointing to us getting a shared universe on the small screen revolving around these characters. Now, there's no word on who they might be but an alternate version of the wall-crawler is highly likely as are some supporting heroes and villains.
Sony will obviously have to co-ordinate with Marvel Studios to avoid any confusion but the prospect of seeing a different Peter Parker on the small screen is really exciting. Hopefully, that's what we get and not just a number of shows revolving around D-List characters...then again, in the capable hands of Lord and Miller that might not actually be the worst thing that could happen.
"We’ve been talking to a lot of potential teammates for trying to do something not like anything else that’s been done on television," Miller added. "It’ll be a little while before it all comes together and is on the air, but I think it is going to be something really special."
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
steelbook
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
SPIDER-MAN: FAR FROM HOME Director's Cut Rumored To Arrive In Theaters With More Footage THIS MONTH
A new report claims that the studio is planning to put the sequel back in theaters with unseen footage as a Director's Cut. It's said that it will arrive on August 30th for Labor Day weekend and will remain in theaters until September 5th.
A new report claims that the studio is planning to put the sequel back in theaters with unseen footage as a Director's Cut. It's said that it will arrive on August 30th for Labor Day weekend and will remain in theaters until September 5th.
- 87,735
- 50,125
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
So all those scenes of Peter's to do list before actually leaving which would include the scene with the cops that was in the trailer? 
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
probably, its confirmed that 4-minutes of action sequence so him thwarting those thieves are likely to be added
antidope
Supporter
- 62,298
- 65,045
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
This is so upsetting
- 7,832
- 8,464
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2011
I hate you so much Sony.
- 25,203
- 35,817
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
Disney-Sony Standoff Ends Marvel Studios & Kevin Feige’s Involvement In ‘Spider-Man’
Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige won’t produce any further Spider-Man films because of an inability by Disney and Sony Pictures to reach new terms that would have given the former a co-financing stake going forward. A dispute that has taken place over the past few months at the top of Disney and Sony has essentially nixed Feige, and the future involvement of Marvel from the Spider-Man universe, sources said.
This comes at a moment when the last two films Kevin Feige produced broke all-time records — Disney’s Avengers: Endgame became the highest grossing film of all time, and Spider-Man: Far From Home this week surpassed the James Bond film Skyfall to become the all time highest grossing film for Sony Pictures.
Sources said there are two more Spider-Man films in the works that are meant to have director Jon Watts and Tom Holland front and center. Unless something dramatic happens, Feige won’t be the lead creative producer of those pictures.
There is a lot of webbing here, but it all comes down to money, and it’s easy to understand why both sides refused to give ground. Disney asked that future Spider-Man films be a 50/50 co-financing arrangement between the studios, and there were discussions that this might extend to other films in the Spider-Man universe. Sony turned that offer down flat, and I don’t believe they even came back to the table to figure out a compromise. Led by Tom Rothman and Tony Vinciquerra, Sony just simply didn’t want to share its biggest franchise. Sony proposed keeping the arrangement going under the current terms where Marvel receives in the range of 5% of first dollar gross, sources said. Disney refused.
Now, it’s easy to say that Feige has enough on his plate, especially after taking control of the X-Men universe in the Fox acquisition, including the Deadpool franchise, along with architecting the next phase of the Marvel superhero universe and building movies and shows for Disney +. But I’m told Feige loves Spider-Man, arguably the biggest superhero character in the Marvel canon. He would have continued if Disney and Sony could have reached new deal terms.
Essentially Sony has made a decision that is similar to saying, thank you, but we think we can win the championship without Michael Jordan. After all, Feige’s first decade at Marvel is largely unblemished and his consistency has been nothing short of historic: even George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson haven’t seen everything turn into a hit, and so maybe only James Cameron has the success record that Feige has achieved. But Feige has done it all in the last 10 years, producing and overseeing 23 superheros, with not a flop in the bunch. They’ve all been number one openers that have collectively grossed $26.8 billion. Feige this year became the producer of the top grossing film ever for two studios — Sony and Disney — and he produced three of the top four highest grossing films this year in Avengers: Endgame, Captain Marvel and Spider-Man: Far From Home. This after scoring the first ever Best Picture Oscar nom for a superhero film last year with Black Panther. I can’t think of a Hollywood producer/executive who has done anything close to this.
And the launch of the new iteration of Spider-Man was done brilliantly with Marvel’s support and help. It has been a boon to both studios. Tom Holland’s character was introduced in the Joe & Anthony Russo-directed 2016 blockbuster Captain America: Civil War, the film that set up the two record breaking Avengers films. Sony’s first rebooted Spidey film, 2017’s Spider-Man: Homecoming, rode that Marvel wave and grossed $880 million worldwide, and then the webslinger was a key character in the two Avengers films, leading to the Spidey sequel that this week became Sony’s top grossing film ever.
Sources said Disney’s top brass for the past several months has sought new terms for Feige and the Marvel cross-pollination to continue. As the Spider-Man relationship grew, Feige and Sony Pictures chief Tom Rothman spoke about the possibility of a wider involvement in the Sony-controlled Spider-man universe, which contains 900 characters. I’m told that Feige lent an unofficial hand with the blockbuster Venom, but I’ve also been told that that film was far from the polished product that grossed $856 million worldwide, until Rothman himself spent a good long time in the editing room helping to get it there.
It is understandable that the fiscally shrewd Rothman would balk at giving up half of Sony’s biggest franchise to Marvel. After all, Marvel already owns the merchandising on Spider-Man. Does the Mouse really need half of the movie universe also? Sony so far has decided that as valuable as Feige is, Disney is asking too high a price.
Sources said that Sony reasoned that they will be fine, without Feige. The creative template has been set on the Spider-Man films, and Watt and Holland are in place along with Amy Pascal, who became producer with Feige after she exited the executive suite after presiding over the previous Spider-man iterations directed by Sam Raimi and Marc Webb as Sony Pictures chief.
The Venom sequel is well underway with Andy Serkis directing Tom Hardy, and there is Morbius with Jared Leto, Kraven The Hunter, and another spinoff with the characters Silver Sable and Black Cat. And a Sinister Six film that got shelved. Sony, which once felt the ticking clock of generating a Spider-Man film every three or so years to prevent a rights reversion to Disney, now has plenty of pictures to make. And the studio also won the Best Animated Feature Oscar for Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse, a smash hit they made on their own.
Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige won’t produce any further Spider-Man films because of an inability by Disney and Sony Pictures to reach new terms that would have given the former a co-financing stake going forward. A dispute that has taken place over the past few months at the top of Disney and Sony has essentially nixed Feige, and the future involvement of Marvel from the Spider-Man universe, sources said.
This comes at a moment when the last two films Kevin Feige produced broke all-time records — Disney’s Avengers: Endgame became the highest grossing film of all time, and Spider-Man: Far From Home this week surpassed the James Bond film Skyfall to become the all time highest grossing film for Sony Pictures.
Sources said there are two more Spider-Man films in the works that are meant to have director Jon Watts and Tom Holland front and center. Unless something dramatic happens, Feige won’t be the lead creative producer of those pictures.
There is a lot of webbing here, but it all comes down to money, and it’s easy to understand why both sides refused to give ground. Disney asked that future Spider-Man films be a 50/50 co-financing arrangement between the studios, and there were discussions that this might extend to other films in the Spider-Man universe. Sony turned that offer down flat, and I don’t believe they even came back to the table to figure out a compromise. Led by Tom Rothman and Tony Vinciquerra, Sony just simply didn’t want to share its biggest franchise. Sony proposed keeping the arrangement going under the current terms where Marvel receives in the range of 5% of first dollar gross, sources said. Disney refused.
Now, it’s easy to say that Feige has enough on his plate, especially after taking control of the X-Men universe in the Fox acquisition, including the Deadpool franchise, along with architecting the next phase of the Marvel superhero universe and building movies and shows for Disney +. But I’m told Feige loves Spider-Man, arguably the biggest superhero character in the Marvel canon. He would have continued if Disney and Sony could have reached new deal terms.
Essentially Sony has made a decision that is similar to saying, thank you, but we think we can win the championship without Michael Jordan. After all, Feige’s first decade at Marvel is largely unblemished and his consistency has been nothing short of historic: even George Lucas, Steven Spielberg and Peter Jackson haven’t seen everything turn into a hit, and so maybe only James Cameron has the success record that Feige has achieved. But Feige has done it all in the last 10 years, producing and overseeing 23 superheros, with not a flop in the bunch. They’ve all been number one openers that have collectively grossed $26.8 billion. Feige this year became the producer of the top grossing film ever for two studios — Sony and Disney — and he produced three of the top four highest grossing films this year in Avengers: Endgame, Captain Marvel and Spider-Man: Far From Home. This after scoring the first ever Best Picture Oscar nom for a superhero film last year with Black Panther. I can’t think of a Hollywood producer/executive who has done anything close to this.
And the launch of the new iteration of Spider-Man was done brilliantly with Marvel’s support and help. It has been a boon to both studios. Tom Holland’s character was introduced in the Joe & Anthony Russo-directed 2016 blockbuster Captain America: Civil War, the film that set up the two record breaking Avengers films. Sony’s first rebooted Spidey film, 2017’s Spider-Man: Homecoming, rode that Marvel wave and grossed $880 million worldwide, and then the webslinger was a key character in the two Avengers films, leading to the Spidey sequel that this week became Sony’s top grossing film ever.
Sources said Disney’s top brass for the past several months has sought new terms for Feige and the Marvel cross-pollination to continue. As the Spider-Man relationship grew, Feige and Sony Pictures chief Tom Rothman spoke about the possibility of a wider involvement in the Sony-controlled Spider-man universe, which contains 900 characters. I’m told that Feige lent an unofficial hand with the blockbuster Venom, but I’ve also been told that that film was far from the polished product that grossed $856 million worldwide, until Rothman himself spent a good long time in the editing room helping to get it there.
It is understandable that the fiscally shrewd Rothman would balk at giving up half of Sony’s biggest franchise to Marvel. After all, Marvel already owns the merchandising on Spider-Man. Does the Mouse really need half of the movie universe also? Sony so far has decided that as valuable as Feige is, Disney is asking too high a price.
Sources said that Sony reasoned that they will be fine, without Feige. The creative template has been set on the Spider-Man films, and Watt and Holland are in place along with Amy Pascal, who became producer with Feige after she exited the executive suite after presiding over the previous Spider-man iterations directed by Sam Raimi and Marc Webb as Sony Pictures chief.
The Venom sequel is well underway with Andy Serkis directing Tom Hardy, and there is Morbius with Jared Leto, Kraven The Hunter, and another spinoff with the characters Silver Sable and Black Cat. And a Sinister Six film that got shelved. Sony, which once felt the ticking clock of generating a Spider-Man film every three or so years to prevent a rights reversion to Disney, now has plenty of pictures to make. And the studio also won the Best Animated Feature Oscar for Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse, a smash hit they made on their own.
- 25,203
- 35,817
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2007
Can't wait for the impending rant from @lamekilla though
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- 14,962
- 4,139
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
Bruh. I wish Holland had the balls to say that he is out.
- 85,424
- 111,447
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2010
I get the stance from both sides. It still sucks as the viewer. 
antidope
Supporter
- 62,298
- 65,045
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
I'm so annoyed man. Sony just needs to except that they can't do this.
- 146,376
- 192,565
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
big j 33
Supporter
- 35,443
- 15,797
- Joined
- May 31, 2006
Sucks for the fans, but I'm still shocked the deal happened in the first place.
Sony needed the help and got the assist, and now they'll hope they can continue where Marvel left off and take back their own control. I am very skeptical.
Sony needed the help and got the assist, and now they'll hope they can continue where Marvel left off and take back their own control. I am very skeptical.
- 10,205
- 3,278
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2001
How they can even go back at this point? How will they take back all the Iron Man influences on Tom Hollands character?
SMDH. So basically, theres going to be another reboot...............No other way to do it.
SMDH. So basically, theres going to be another reboot...............No other way to do it.
- 73,034
- 59,769
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
