wow, from the side, and rear it looks so much like a lambo edit: yeah much fast than lambo. Well depending on model, this car has pretty much double the bhp of a lambo
Old, posted this over a month ago. What i love about this is it's a V8 and just shows 16 cylinders is unnecessary.
Ummmm, this isn't made by Shelby as in the Shelby Mustang, SSC is a brand as in Shelby Super Cars and is not affiliated with the Shelby you know of orFord in anyway.
it's nice and all, but couldn't they have come up with something other then a lambo knock-off design?
I would say it looks more like a CCX. All cars look like one another, when you get to the supercar area there are only so many designs that aero well
The base Aero model is priced from $239,000, while the Ultimate Aero would cost well over $650,000. thaz from wikipedia
Oh whats not to love! + + + = and I kid. But seriously, these are some ugly looking cars. and I am ever so sorry about mistaking the crappy Shelby Company for the crappier Shelby Supercars, master. I just don't think that it is that impressive when a company uses all its R&D and money on making one car and not focusing on anything thing elsebut the top speed. (No matter what country is comes from) Any company that has enough money and is willing to spend it on just making one model can do that. and I'll have you know I love and I like American Cars from the 40s, 50s, 60s. I also think that recent production cars from the states have been topnotch. Their designing has greatly improved and they are increasing in reliability and performance.
I can accept that. But by your logic, you would have to admit that Bugatti is the crappiest of all the companies because they too spend all their R&D timeproducing a car with record-breaking top speed in mind, yet they were beaten by SSC...