Surprise! ANOTHER Travis Scott 1 Legit Check

169
12
Joined
Oct 30, 2004
The title says it all. It’s ANOTHER legit check of these damn Travis Scott 1s we love to... fake. I know, I know, and I’m sorry. These were from SNKRS... I’m totally kidding and wish they were, but I felt immense amounts of FOMO (I’m working on it) and paid resale for these. I’m just going to post the pics and let them do the talking. The source sometimes clouds people’s judgement because of preconceived notions but I assure you, it’s not from a “friend with hook upzzzzz” or “some guy in Harlem”. No, the price wasn’t too good to be true either... it was actually not great.

Anyways, here are the pictures....

Under the box cover (no “secret” swoosh or whatever):
0B4E1FE4-B411-49E9-A21F-6A43C45EB5F0.jpeg



The box in comparison to another Jordan 1 box:

C8BBA473-8601-4C6C-B17E-A64D2D68DA28.jpeg


The box tissue (lighting is bad but it’s a light pink)

3AC29276-153A-4855-86BB-39C94319FE1D.jpeg


Box tag:
DE95E455-F030-4987-A470-2F5403D3E52A.jpeg


Sticker inside the box:
6BD37B4C-4BFB-4706-A62F-9547AC44FA09.jpeg


General:
49CC5A9E-217A-4F0E-BA32-412C29F11CDD.jpeg


Lace Bags:
B871F0CB-6D71-4D77-9A1F-EE36632B1FEA.jpeg

Top View:
70420766-BF62-4347-A29E-0B50288219FC.jpeg


Toe Box:
7384E869-CDAF-49B5-AD23-CF959128DDB1.jpeg


Back view (the left pair’s face is a lot less... “stamped” in or crisp and they actually don’t reallly look centered but what the eff do I know?):
007CDF50-FE7C-40C4-8882-42B36FC783B9.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Part 2 cause I can only upload 10 pictures and those clearly weren’t enough:

General:

6C0197F7-1A30-409F-9937-37DBC2DFD3CB.jpeg

The stars on the sole are kinda different under each pair:
E82727D4-818F-4460-B3F1-CB988F015156.jpeg

The numbers under the tongue tag:
2DFBB777-6E3B-483A-99DA-25FC64E261B6.jpeg

Here is the shoe tag:
62A604F6-D368-4CA7-96A9-BEB6E2D27C28.jpeg


More:
5155B8DB-2D94-41A3-B31B-E5EF636E09F0.jpeg

More:
F1292E78-EEF0-488F-8055-52618D35B02C.jpeg

I forgot whether the white stitching was a tell tale sign of something.... or if it was a tell tale sign of another thing:
54AA7A49-3CEA-4119-B8E1-FE91000DD6BD.jpeg

The leather of the sides kinda bothers me? I was watching a video on YouTube but I’m seeing so many things at this point I dunno if I was even watching the video for the right pair of shoes....
B59E9E75-8229-461F-8D0B-8408897862AC.jpeg


Jordan logo.... also, the swoosh pointing close to where the brown part ends apparently isn’t a good sign either?....

1B8B0269-A5A1-4404-810A-05449EEE2C2C.jpeg

At least it’s 3M but I unfortunately forgot my black light for this...
070A7255-ADC7-4900-A35F-F1C0DFD95989.jpeg
 
Last edited:
And finally.... Part 3 because... the limit thing again:

Profile of the shoe... Again, the leather kinda bothered me and it isn’t as white as this one legit check video made it seem. And my gf said they resemble the fakes more in those side to side YouTube videos.... Also, the swoosh almost ends or points similarly to the fake pairs I’ve seen... online.

A330C7CB-6420-41D4-9D37-A3E94889A44B.jpeg


This part is probably the worst. The lace holes stitching is so bad and isn’t as wavey as the 1s normally look. And it looks like a little kid tried chewing the top corner... WTF happened???....

C9FB5C8E-8358-4CEE-B974-0F36B2F77215.jpeg


The back picture again to show the shape of the shoe:

B6D9A4EE-7699-45AD-B87D-C115CB471B74.jpeg

The leather I’ve brought up a thousand times. Also the stitching of the swoosh:
B1771DF6-EEA7-4E0C-911D-418668F5556B.jpeg


Here’s a closer look at the toe box:

475CDF17-9438-448F-AA12-D7C9EFFD0844.jpeg


Another look at the Swoosh....

85C300F0-0911-42A1-A21D-D821DB0FECDA.jpeg


The Cactus jack on the tongue:

D01A68E9-5184-4278-8195-6EE490F13B8A.jpeg


General:
72BF4AF2-BF7A-45A5-8D68-BBEE78E3E724.jpeg


If more pics are needed, let me know. Any help is appreciated!

Oh! Also, the smell is pretty decently consistent with a couple of other Jordan 1s I bought straight from Nike. But again, I don’t know how good of a test that is because my allergies are always acting up so I can barely smell anything properly as is.... The suede does feel pretty nice around the toe box but the back, it doesn’t feel like it should? (“How do you know man?! You don’t have a real pair!”) - good question, it’s because of those damn YouTube videos doing the comparisons. If there are more pictures needed or these are so badly Fake, let me know either way. I’ll try to get my money back somehow and also consider this as a lesson in, “retail or cry about it”....
 
Last edited:
The source sometimes clouds people’s judgement because of preconceived notions but I assure you, it’s not from a “friend with hook upzzzzz” or “some guy in Harlem”. No, the price wasn’t too good to be true either... it was actually not great.
Knowing the source and how your source got them does help.
Under the box cover (no “secret” swoosh or whatever):
The box does not need to have any stamp on it. There could be a code or a swoosh. Fakes have replicated the code already, most of the time its a bit off. I don't know if they replicated the swoosh stamp yet, but I am sure they will if they haven't done so already.
Back view (the left pair’s face is a lot less... “stamped” in or crisp and they actually don’t reallly look centered but what the eff do I know?):
Get Close-ups of each of the stamps so that I can see them better. The placement looks fine, I haven't seen that be a problem for authentic or fake pairs.
The stars on the sole are kinda different under each pair:
This varies normally in authentic pairs. Some might be very defined while others are poor quality. Its something that isnt really used for LC's.
The numbers under the tongue tag:
That code is not used for LC, but the text on the tongue is used for LC by me, so take a better picture of the text behind the back on the tongue and in the front, Not the code.
I forgot whether the white stitching was a tell tale sign of something.... or if it was a tell tale sign of another thing:
Some authentic pairs will come with white stitching. If its black or white does not seem to matter.
The leather of the sides kinda bothers me? I was watching a video on YouTube but I’m seeing so many things at this point I dunno if I was even watching the video for the right pair of shoes....
Authentic pairs will vary in leather quality some will be tumbled like yours others may be smoother. Please don't rely on these Youtube videos, the best info can usually be found on here or Reddit.
Jordan logo.... also, the swoosh pointing close to where the brown part ends apparently isn’t a good sign either?....
There should just normally be a gap in between the leather and the wings logo.
Profile of the shoe... Again, the leather kinda bothered me and it isn’t as white as this one legit check video made it seem. And my gf said they resemble the fakes more in those side to side YouTube videos.... Also, the swoosh almost ends or points similarly to the fake pairs I’ve seen... online.
I don't see what you mean.
This part is probably the worst. The lace holes stitching is so bad and isn’t as wavey as the 1s normally look. And it looks like a little kid tried chewing the top corner... WTF happened???....
That is more frayed then what I normally see.
If more pics are needed, let me know. Any help is appreciated!
I do want more pictures.
Get close ups of each of the 'Nike Air' on the insole, both soles and on both tongues. Take close ups of the each of the face logos on the back, get good quality photos. Get close ups of each of the text on the back of the tongue, no the code. Take a better picture of the medial swoosh with the shoe standing up at eye level, its looks a bit odd to me, but it could just be your photo. I want to see the shoe tress and front view of the lace bags. Also better natural lighting would help, your photos aren't the the best quality.


Here are some authentic pairs in your size that you can compare to:


 
I do want more pictures.
Get close ups of each of the 'Nike Air' on the insole, both soles and on both tongues. Take close ups of the each of the face logos on the back, get good quality photos. Get close ups of each of the text on the back of the tongue, no the code. Take a better picture of the medial swoosh with the shoe standing up at eye level, its looks a bit odd to me, but it could just be your photo. I want to see the shoe tress and front view of the lace bags. Also better natural lighting would help, your photos aren't the the best quality.

I seriously appreciate you taking the time to respond. Here are some of the pictures you suggested.

C1CA5ABB-C101-482B-BA87-8DF37F32AA3C.jpeg
0720344D-3464-4F7C-925B-32D3C960E77C.jpeg

427FF31E-F967-4350-A4E7-D8AEB3251A92.jpeg
C964B590-3F12-4FF3-97F7-6F4A760B4CDA.jpeg
016AF539-A041-4936-BBC1-A38B66DAA792.jpeg
E90F0F36-2887-4D9C-B61A-4F23C5A7FA25.jpeg
41123DFF-ADEF-4E1F-9F48-E28241041B7E.jpeg
530E59C0-7D53-4729-B77B-BBEE6AC3BADE.jpeg
7B56A25E-9ADF-4D20-9A78-BD71EA15BF8E.jpeg
57E4B9C8-25DF-4AC2-A232-0510557D717C.jpeg
 
More pictures...

9713A6E3-8878-471B-82D7-916B577C508E.jpeg
81A1C472-4A44-4DCA-9169-16BC8918D28E.jpeg
153EB42E-EAA9-4407-A9D5-D2F2BFC949A6.jpeg
5D8BB2E3-EBA9-491C-86CC-1352A1402A94.jpeg
A4B8F0A9-71FF-48DC-A483-9E8B9356DF45.jpeg
6D793C04-0C8E-41DA-8EF0-E9A8FF66FD98.jpeg


Also, I appreciate retro fiend for responding as well.
 

Attachments

  • 889D9349-89E8-466B-80E1-35BCFFB9D230.jpeg
    889D9349-89E8-466B-80E1-35BCFFB9D230.jpeg
    294.9 KB · Views: 7
These are authentic in my opinion.
The color in your photos look too dark, but I am going to assume its poor quality photos. The embossing on the left shoe is not so deep but this happens normally. Everything else looks fine to me, All the small details that I check look right.
 
Back
Top Bottom