The Guise of Affirmative Action

gllahone84

Banned
11,730
1,911
Joined Jul 10, 2011
In the coming days, the Supreme Court is expected to rule in a potentially landmark case on the constitutionality of affirmative action. The original lawsuit was filed on behalf of Abigail Fisher, a woman who claims that she was denied admission to the University of Texas because she is white. But study after study shows that affirmative action helps white women as much or even more than it helps men and women of color. Ironically, Abigail Fisher is exactly the kind of person affirmative actions most helps in America today.

Originally, women weren’t even included in legislation attempting to level the playing field in education and employment. The first affirmative action measure in America was an executive order signed by President Kennedy in 1961 requiring that federal contractors “take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed, and employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.” In 1967, President Johnson amended this and a subsequent measure to include sex, recognizing that women also faced many discriminatory barriers and hurdles to equal opportunity. Meanwhile, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 only included “sex” in the list of prohibited forms of discrimination because conservative opponents of the legislation hoped including it would sway moderate members of Congress to withdraw their support for the bill. Still, in a nation where both white women and black people were once considered property, not allowed to own property themselves, and not allowed to vote, it was clear to all those seeking fairness and opportunity that both groups faced monumental obstacles.

While people of color, individually and as groups, have been helped by affirmative action in the subsequent years, data and studies suggest women— white women in particular — have benefited disproportionately. According to one study, in 1995 six million women—the majority which were white— had jobs they wouldn’t have otherwise held but for affirmative action.

Another study shows that women made greater gains in employment at companies doing business with the federal government, and therefore subject to federal affirmative action requirements, than in other companies—with female employment rising 15.2% at federal contractors but only 2.2% elsewhere. And the women working for federal contractor companies also held higher positions and were paid better.

Even in the private sector, the advancements of white women eclipse those of people of color. After IBM established its own affirmative action program, the numbers of women in management positions more than tripled in less than 10 years. Data from subsequent years shows that the number of executives of color at IBM also grew, but not nearly at the same rate.

The successes of white women make a case not for abandoning affirmative action but continuing it. As the numbers in the Senate show and the Fortune 500 show, women still face barriers to equal participation in leadership roles. Of course, the case for continuing affirmative action for people of color is even greater. The median wealth  of white households is 20 times that of black households. Researchers found  that the exact same resume for the exact same job application will get twice as many call-backs for interviews if the name on the resume is “Greg” instead of “Jamal”. School districts spend more  on predominantly white schools than predominantly black schools. The fact that black workers earn, on average, 35% less  than white workers in the same jobs isn’t erased by the election of an African American president, one who, by the way, openly praises the role of affirmative action in his life and accomplishments.

As for Abigail Fisher, there is ample evidence that she just wasn’t qualified to get into the University of Texas. After all, her grades weren’t that great and the year she applied for UT, admissions there were actually more competitive than Harvard. In its court filings, the University has pointed out that even if Fisher received a point for race, she still wouldn’t have met the threshold for admissions. Yes, it is true that the same year, UT made exceptions and admitted some students with lower grades and test scores than Fisher. Five of those students were black or Latino. Forty-two were white.

Read more: http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/17/af...d-white-women-more-than-anyone/#ixzz2WW4PLzar
 

tengoeljugode

Banned
292
48
Joined Jul 7, 2012
Any successful black person I've ever met loathes AA. The only people who demand AA are surprisingly people that are not benefiting from it, but rather complaining that it doesn't do enough.

Edit... And I've never met a women who wasn't black with an opinion about AA.
 
Last edited:

rell826

Banned
6,743
2,126
Joined Apr 25, 2013
Great article and it showed the holes in Fisher's argument. It was said in the OG thread on the case. Had she got in to UT Austin it would have been because she was a woman but she never thought of that. The amount of women that get accepted into universities is disproportionate to the amount of blacks.

I'm hoping that the Supreme Court shoots this down. It's a necessary evil. Until the United States government can ensure equality with its education system, there will always be a need for it.
 
Last edited:

tengoeljugode

Banned
292
48
Joined Jul 7, 2012
I've done significant study on the mismatch problem in universities of AA. If AA was nothing more than gender centric it would be an effective policy.
 

rell826

Banned
6,743
2,126
Joined Apr 25, 2013
Link to the OG discussion

niketalk.com/t/510096/supreme-court-set-to-decide-future-of-affirmative-action/0_20
 
Top Bottom
  AdBlock Detected

Sure, ad-blocking software does a great job at blocking ads, but it also blocks some useful and important features of our website. For the best possible site experience please take a moment to disable your AdBlocker or head over to our upgrade page to donate for an ad-free experience Upgrade now