The Official Photography Thread - Vol. 3

Discussion in 'General' started by rap sizzle, Dec 15, 2009.

  1. rap sizzle

    rap sizzle

    1,801
    19
    Joined
    Jan 25, 2007
    If money is no issue at all and you're willing to drop as much as a 70-200 f/2.8 IS, he should consider upgrading the camera itself. The XT isstill an excellent camera but an update to a T1i or even a 50D wouldn't hurt if money isn't an issue.
     
  2. djaward

    djaward

    6,271
    2,301
    Joined
    Sep 30, 2004
    WOW thanks for the help guys.. Ok so $1,000 is steep. I want to buy her more than one gift.. SO I guess price range would be 500.. I saw some within thoseprice range.. QUestion to KTEEZY
    Those lense you posted, ARE THEY HEAVY?? They look like they are.. My wife like runningup and down the field while my son is playing.. Im guessing those lenseare going to make it difficult.. Also our lense now (the stock one) saps the pics pretty fast.. If I get a new lense, will that go away?
     
  3. rap sizzle

    rap sizzle

    1,801
    19
    Joined
    Jan 25, 2007
    ^ What do you mean by "saps the pics pretty fast"?

    The 70-200 f/4L (the cheapest of the 70-200 family) is around your price range ($600 new, $500 used) and is the lightest of the 4 lenses. It has USM sofocusing is fast and silent.
     
  4. djaward

    djaward

    6,271
    2,301
    Joined
    Sep 30, 2004
    I meant SNAPS THE PICS PRETTY FAST.. Is that a function on the camera or is it the lense?
     
  5. digitalartclub

    digitalartclub

    200
    10
    Joined
    Sep 30, 2004
    snaps the pics pretty fast? quick shutter speed?
     
  6. ksteezy

    ksteezy

    34,278
    11,616
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2009

    like rap zizzle said the 70-200mm f/4 non IS is the cheapest one and lightest aswell, although they are all pretty heavy to be honest...however your xti is asmall dslr, so its not as heavy as lets say a 5d or 1d, but i can see why you are concern about her being a woman and the fact that she likes to be versatile,maybe the 55-250mm will be a better fit for her, much smaller and lighter, but like i already said dont expect to get spectacular shots if the lightingconditions on the field are anything less than great, at the longest range (250mm) she will be forced to an aperture of 5.6 or so....this will limit yourcameras ability to absorb light and you will be forced to use higher ISOs causing noise or lower shutters causing motion blurr, so in my opinion its a toss upbetween the 70-200mm f/4.0 like Rap Zizzle suggested or the 55-250mm.
    as far as far as how fast your camera snaps the pic, this has absolutely nothing to do with your lense, its a camera feature, so no, it will not go away. [​IMG]
     
  7. verynecessary

    verynecessary

    746
    10
    Joined
    Aug 10, 2005
    i think dude means focus+release the shutter. shutter lag is almost a non issue for any dslr, it's the focusing that slows things down. the lens caneffect this, especially the longer the focal length. shouldn't be a problem in daylight though.
     
  8. new wu

    new wu Banned

    1,379
    13
    Joined
    Nov 6, 2009

    Info?
     
  9. Fong$tarr

    Fong$tarr

    11,302
    4,439
    Joined
    Oct 9, 2007
    ^^^^Here is the caption:

     
  10. djaward

    djaward

    6,271
    2,301
    Joined
    Sep 30, 2004
    The 55-250mm looks smaller.. Im going to look into the 70-200.. No matter what lense I get, it will still be alot better than the stock one. Dontget me wrong, the stock lense makes pics look great. So Im sure the a newer and bigger lense will make the pics look alot better. Which will make her happy.Thats all Im going for.. Again thanks for the help. When I decide I will let you know..

    By the way, we are celebrating our 10th year anniversary on the 26... [​IMG]
     
  11. ksteezy

    ksteezy

    34,278
    11,616
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2009

    good luck, you will love any 70-200 you decide to go for....you should get her a monopod aswell...i know you said she likes to move around, but with thislonger reach she probably wont even have to and the monopod will definately make up for the fact that this lense is not equipped with IS.
    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/645083-REG/Benro_453_096_MA_96EX_Aluminum_Monopod.html
    ENJOY!
     
  12. rikan havok

    rikan havok

    793
    10
    Joined
    Oct 3, 2008
    You have to many variables to answer that question ...

    Every answer that has been giving is correct, but unless we know what we are working with - all of these might not be your answer ..

    From how much light to what aperture to what mode you shooting to how you want your pictures exposure to be ..... Everything goes hand in hand ...

    There are also many ways you can achieve what you are looking for in a more affordable way - however it might not be convenient ...

    Just give a price range ....
     
  13. rikan havok

    rikan havok

    793
    10
    Joined
    Oct 3, 2008
    I wouldnt suggest the 70-200 f/4 for indoor use .. Im sure you will have to kick your ISO to get to a manageble shutter speed and have the pictures sharp ...If your wife shoots manual - you will not even notice what your camera is doing because its automaticly however when you get home you might be dissapointed ...
     
  14. rikan havok

    rikan havok

    793
    10
    Joined
    Oct 3, 2008
    of course Im talking about indoor use and dim places .. even cloudy days .. outside with the sun shinning down .. no problem go for it!
     
  15. kiddin like jason

    kiddin like jason

    16,340
    13
    Joined
    Dec 28, 2002
    Are there any other major online retailers similar to B&H?
     
  16. ksteezy

    ksteezy

    34,278
    11,616
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2009
  17. rikan havok

    rikan havok

    793
    10
    Joined
    Oct 3, 2008
    Adorama.com

    PennCamera.com

    Cameta.com

    to name a few ..

    You can also join

    Fredmiranda.com it's a camera forum but they have a great buy/sell side with great people .. not sure if you want to go this route .. I have and I dontmind it ...
     
  18. digitalartclub

    digitalartclub

    200
    10
    Joined
    Sep 30, 2004
    keh.com is good if you are looking for some decent prices on used equipment. Each item has a ranking on the condition of the product so you have an idea ofit's wear and tear.
     
  19. ksteezy

    ksteezy

    34,278
    11,616
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2009
    i will go ahead and add Amazon.com, although its not exclusive to photography, you can find some really good deals and even kit packages, aswell as consumerreviews on alot of products and sample images.
     
  20. xxokayplayerxx

    xxokayplayerxx

    109
    10
    Joined
    Oct 6, 2002
  21. mjbetch

    mjbetch

    4,037
    862
    Joined
    Dec 2, 2004
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  22. justhotkicks

    justhotkicks Moderator

    4,641
    83
    Joined
    Nov 1, 2005

    like rap zizzle said the 70-200mm f/4 non IS is the cheapest one and lightest aswell, although they are all pretty heavy to be honest...however your xti is a small dslr, so its not as heavy as lets say a 5d or 1d, but i can see why you are concern about her being a woman and the fact that she likes to be versatile, maybe the 55-250mm will be a better fit for her, much smaller and lighter, but like i already said dont expect to get spectacular shots if the lighting conditions on the field are anything less than great, at the longest range (250mm) she will be forced to an aperture of 5.6 or so....this will limit your cameras ability to absorb light and you will be forced to use higher ISOs causing noise or lower shutters causing motion blurr, so in my opinion its a toss up between the 70-200mm f/4.0 like Rap Zizzle suggested or the 55-250mm.
    as far as far as how fast your camera snaps the pic, this has absolutely nothing to do with your lense, its a camera feature, so no, it will not go away. [​IMG]
    The 55-250mm looks smaller.. Im going to look into the 70-200.. No matter what lense I get, it will still be alot better than the stock one. Dont get me wrong, the stock lense makes pics look great. So Im sure the a newer and bigger lense will make the pics look alot better. Which will make her happy. Thats all Im going for.. Again thanks for the help. When I decide I will let you know..

    By the way, we are celebrating our 10th year anniversary on the 26... [​IMG]



    If you think the kit lens looks good, any lens you buy from here on out will blow your socks off LOL. You'll love it!

    55-250 if you just want a longer zoom + good photos
    70-200 f/4L non-IS if you want longer zoom + really crisp photos

    Congrats on the anniversary!
     
  23. ksteezy

    ksteezy

    34,278
    11,616
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2009

    i love the composition and feel of that second shot, perfect for a portrait/fashion shoot.
     
  24. i flipzkickz i

    i flipzkickz i

    277
    29
    Joined
    Feb 28, 2003
    Concert photos from Berkeley a few weeks back of Michelle Martinez, Erika David, AJ Rafael, and Reynard Silva

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  25. ksteezy

    ksteezy

    34,278
    11,616
    Joined
    Dec 3, 2009
    really feeling the second one and the UWA perspective of the 4th one, good stuff man.

    a couple of old ones.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]