They retro toys, clothes, shoes, etc. Y not cars?

4,240
1,216
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
I'm just wondering y is it that they won't retro cars? Imagine being able to buy a real muscle car? A classic? A mustang, camaro, impala, etc.
pimp.gif
 
It wouldn't make sense. The costs of reproducing a shirt, shoe, or toy are minimal. Mass producing an intricate product like a car would be costly and inmost cases would not be a guaranteed sale.
 
they gotta reproduce parts too for when the car needs new ones. plus the reason they came out newer cars is because technology advanced so you aren'tnecessarily getting the best product (though the same can be said for everything you listed).
 
Originally Posted by pr0phecy718

It would hurt the value of those originals
that doesn't stop nike from doing it to sneakers....

and techincally they are retroing cars...all those chargers, challengers, etc. that we all like are retro inspired.
 
^^^

Originally Posted by ro0ts

The costs of reproducing a shirt, shoe, or toy are minimal. Mass producing an intricate product like a car would be costly and in most cases would not be a guaranteed sale.
 
Originally Posted by ro0ts

It wouldn't make sense. The costs of reproducing a shirt, shoe, or toy are minimal. Mass producing an intricate product like a car would be costly and in most cases would not be a guaranteed sale.

co-sign... and the engines are not that fuel efficient too...
 
Originally Posted by SW33TS1NC3R1TY

you slap a limited tag on them and you'll see how fast they fly off the lot.

true but most likely they'd be more expensive if limited than if they were "general release"

it really depends what models...if it's a very rare model that cannot be found elsewhere, then yeah it can happen
 
hmmmm.....i don't know, instead of making all of these retro themed cars, i think they should just make the old car with new parts.

that's why those shelby cobra shells sell, because people want a cobra.
 
they gotta reproduce parts too for when the car needs new ones. plus the reason they came out newer cars is because technology advanced so you aren't necessarily getting the best product

Pretty much.

Sometimes, they bring back nameplates (Pontiac GTO, Chevrolet Camaro, Chevrolet Monte Carlo) or names similar to the original (Ford GT, Nissan 350Z). And thenthere are companies that reproduce classics, such as the Shelby Cobra, as stated above, and the Shelby GT500.

And then you have the cars that take design cues from other cars from decades past....
 
Originally Posted by SW33TS1NC3R1TY

Originally Posted by pr0phecy718

It would hurt the value of those originals
that doesn't stop nike from doing it to sneakers....

and techincally they are retroing cars...all those chargers, challengers, etc. that we all like are retro inspired.


/thread
 
I've thought about this before, but sadly it'll never happen. It wouldn't be the smartest idea financially at all. I'd love to see a brand new2010 (1990) lol Ford Mustang 5.0....Imagine one of those in a showroom with plastic on the seats and a window sticker? Oh, and a warranty? lol
 
they should....id throw down 50+ for a brand new plum crazy 71 challenger with six pack 440
pimp.gif
But they would do it jus like JB cut corners and ruin a classic......companiesbein greedy FTL
 
They are...kind of. Look at the new mustangs, camaros, and challengers, even the thunderbird from a few years back....they all have a very retro look. Like theclassic body updated with a little modern style.
 
Originally Posted by J Burner

They are...kind of. Look at the new mustangs, camaros, and challengers, even the thunderbird from a few years back....they all have a very retro look. Like the classic body updated with a little modern style.

na man they jus makin"dub zero" "six rings" type cars the bodys inspired by old version but the performance is no where near the same,....70's and 80's muscle cars > anything new ,only post 2000 car that is remotely a muscle car is trans am,camaro and vettes....challengers arnt bad
 
Back
Top Bottom