UA CURRY 2 & 2.5

How is the sizing/fit of the Curry 2?

  • TTS

    Votes: 99 61.1%
  • .5 Big

    Votes: 10 6.2%
  • .5 Small

    Votes: 38 23.5%
  • Narrow

    Votes: 16 9.9%
  • Wide

    Votes: 4 2.5%

  • Total voters
    162
Usa is beautiful. That mango or whatever they're going to call it, not so much
 
I really like UA, but I feel like each shoe is becoming an extension of the original (CFD, SC1, etc.)

I wish they would come up with somewhat of a different design for new models instead of having them be just minimal tweaks on old successful models. Maybe they could just apply this to the SC line and not even the CFD line
 
Love the commercial. Shoes look like the 1s though. Might as well keep the 1s.

That's my issue with the 2. UA hit a home run last year with Curry. The MVP, Title and his Curry 1 sneaker looked good and took off. He's the one guy I think could separate himself sneaker wise from the non Nike pac and have a legacy that rivals Penny, Pippen, Chuck.

Why did UA choose to make a shoe that's so similar looking to the 1? Sigs have a history of building off the previous years model and tech but these come off as a Elite version instead of the next in line. Not a bad looking shoe but a odd choice IMO.
 
On the back of the USAs it looks like there is tape covering up some of the detail. It looks like its got speckling underneath it. Or am I crazy?
 
Maybe one thing with Curry is that with the way his ankles are, he needs specific type of fit, stability, and cut, hence the limitation on the overall design of his shoes.

But yeah these look quite generic, and please do something besides “SC” .
 
I really don't see how they look like the Curry 1. Outsole and midsole completely different
 
Picture the Jordan 1 vs the Jordan 2. Shaq 1 vs. Shaq 2. Etc. These look like they took the same upper and molded the missile differently. Eve the UA symbol on the side is the same.
 
He wore the black pair couple months ago. I rather have the BHM Curry 1 instead.
Is-This-The-Under-Armour-Curry-2-1.jpg


Red pair is nice with gold touch.
 
I really don't see how they look like the Curry 1. Outsole and midsole completely different
I'm on this boat.  It's all a matter of opinion of course, but my take is the only things that look similar are the silhouette and the lace loops, and I guess the UA logo placement. 

No toe guard from what I can tell, tongue looks different and it actually matches the rest of the upper on the 2, obviously outsole got changed up, heel counter is different, upper is way different, outsole looks segmented from heel to forefoot, no mesh tab at the achilles like the Curry 1.  I see more differences than similarities.
 
Not sure how accurate these dates are but the other shoes in the link has the correct RD for the corresponding shoes.
nerd.gif



http://www.basket4ballers.com/content/21-calendrier-des-sorties-release-date

August 30:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-035

September 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-003
Under Armour Curry 2 "Warriors" 1259007-422

October 4:
Under Armour Curry 2 "Black" 1259007-004

November 6:
Under Armour Curry 2 1259007-008
i think this is weird....
Curry 2s overlaping with the Curry 1s is a very very bad marketing strategy

add to the fact that one RD is very near yet there are no traces of it in the website is another weird thing
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom