Originally Posted by TheGift23
Whoever voted for ST...my man
Champ Bailey
Games: 166
Total Tackles: 745
Passes Deflected: 168
Sacks: 2
Forced Fumbles: 8
Interceptions: 46
Yards after INT: 446
TD'S: 4
Charles Woodson
Games: 168
Total Tackles: 717
Passes Deflected: 147
Sacks: 11.5
Forced Fumbles: 22
Interceptions: 45
Yards after INT: 785
TD'S: 9
Champ from 99-06
1999 -- 54-for-113, 830 yards, 4 TD (16 games)
2000 -- 42-for-81, 488 yards, 0 TD (16 games)
2001 -- 40-for-91, 613 yards, 5 TD (16 games)
2002 -- 52-for-98, 567 yards, 2 TD (16 games)
2003 -- 50-for-88, 684 yards, 3 TD (16 games)
2004 -- 49-for-83, 768 yards, 6 TD (16 games)
2005 -- 49-for-97, 680 yards, 5 TD (14 games)
2006 -- 50-for-95, 610 yards, 2 TD (16 games)
Woodson from 98-06
1998 -- 51-for-104, 577 yards, four TDs
1999 -- 35-for-86, 527 yards, three TDs
2000 -- 54-for-96, 543 yards, three TDs
2001 -- 30-for-74, 497 yards, four TDs
2002 -- 30-for-43, 351 yards, no TDs (eight games)
2003 -- 30-for-47, 414 yards, two TDs (15 games)
2004 -- 33-for-53, 441 yards, four TDs (13 games)
2005 -- 16-for-23, 286 yards, no TDs (six games)
2006 -- 42-for-84, 494 yards, three TDs
and Wood has played his best football since 06 too... *shrugs*
and 22 FF's as a CB is just
Originally Posted by dreClark
Champ
Originally Posted by dreClark
Champ
Seymore CAKE wrote:
To me the Peyton/Brady argument is like arguing Marino/Bradshaw.
Shouldn't really be a question as to who's better but people can always feel sometype of way or be able to make take an oposing stance because of the hardware
I see what you saying, but if we did a top all time QB discussion, it would be blown to smithereens.
When I argue Brady v Manning, I use winning in the argument, but being a fan of who I am, I believe Marino to be the best to ever lace em up. And he ain'twin @#$%.
I only refute the people that try to piss all over what Brady has done, and then turn around and hype Manning as some God. That gets old quick.
Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN
