WHICH RETRO REPLICATES ITS OG THE CLOSEST?

Discussion in 'Jordan Brand' started by ny giants 11, Oct 9, 2007.

  1. d e beatup

    d e beatup

    2,147
    974
    Joined
    Aug 17, 2004
     
  2. zerogravity23

    zerogravity23 Banned

    4,882
    15
    Joined
    Jan 3, 2007
    I agree with the blk/red XIIs and the blk/red XIIIs
    TeamWolfShirts
    "Na Fa Fo Fo Fo Na Fa"
     
  3. swingshot

    swingshot

    3,180
    11
    Joined
    Jul 14, 2002
     
  4. fr4nch1s3

    fr4nch1s3

    1,432
    166
    Joined
    Feb 5, 2005
    XIIs hands down
    AKA Kelz
    Looking For:
    Penny 2s Sz 6.5 or 7
    AJ CG IIIs 7.5
    Any color Spizikes in 7.5
     
  5. ao17

    ao17

    8,383
    725
    Joined
    Apr 23, 2007
     
  6. ny giants 11

    ny giants 11

    2,526
    11
    Joined
    Oct 25, 2006
    Its funny to see people say the Flint 13 when they almost two entirely different shoes.

    People saying the 12s....theyre both made of entirely different materials. they just "look" the same.


    AT&T U-VERSE - BEST EVER.
    YEA THE BABY DANCES, TO THINK...ITS CIRCA OG XII
    FOR SALE: BLACK V SZ 13 DS, BLACK CAROLINA 5 SZ 13 VNDS, CAROLINA VI LOW SZ 13 NDS, BLACK BLUE 18 SZ 12 DS. PM ME IF INTERESTED!
     
  7. frenchblue23

    frenchblue23

    15,683
    429
    Joined
    Sep 6, 2005
    ^^ Yup, the XII's soles were more transparent on the OG's than the retros, which was clearly visible.
    TEAM LAKERS
    1949,1950,1952,1953,1954,1972,1980,1982,1985,1987,1988,2000,2001,2002...
    DODGERS
    1955 - 1959 - 1963 - 1965 - 1981 - 1988 ​
    TEAM L.A. KINGS
     
  8. 160jordansdeep

    160jordansdeep

    14,055
    1,522
    Joined
    Dec 24, 2003
    ^Its the same to me so one shoe is a little lighter then the other I am not picky then most out here
    LOWBALLERS 3 NEAR DEADSTOCK SHOES SIZE 9 FOR SALE VC 2 & 3 SHOX SEE MY BUY & SELL POST IN SIZE 9 SECTION EMAIL ME AT [email protected]
     
  9. randz4937

    randz4937

    1,045
    10
    Joined
    Jun 6, 2006
  10. william rivera 3

    william rivera 3 Banned

    2,479
    10
    Joined
    Mar 15, 2001
    ^agreed





    10 and half in my Air Force One, gimme 2 purr- Murphy Lee

    OG NT member since March 15th 2001 with enough grapefruit to use government
     
  11. yimoney23

    yimoney23

    1,842
    11
    Joined
    Dec 23, 2005
    I going to goes with my bred XI and fire red III.
     
  12. jacobmontana

    jacobmontana

    1,573
    11
    Joined
    Mar 24, 2003
    The retro XV's will def be replacing my OG's.
    The World Is Mine
     
  13. jonny1200

    jonny1200

    582
    37
    Joined
    Jul 17, 2005
     
  14. ccookielover49

    ccookielover49

    1,049
    16
    Joined
    Dec 15, 2005
    1999 bred IV are perfect imo

    TEAM PS3
    PLAY B3YOND
    cookielover49​
     
  15. bullsrepeat3peat

    bullsrepeat3peat

    3,347
    10
    Joined
    Sep 29, 2007
     
  16. aj27526

    aj27526

    4,641
    822
    Joined
    Dec 13, 2005
    What about the Original play-off VIIIs and the upcoming retro?
     
  17. corporatejp

    corporatejp

    1,026
    10
    Joined
    May 27, 2004
    The XII's were almost dead on, but with somewhat improved cushioning.

    Isn't that funny...an improvement on a retro?
    The Undisputed World Heavyweight Champion.​
     
  18. never wear them

    never wear them

    11,226
    109
    Joined
    May 8, 2006
    people that are saying xii, you must not own a lot of og xii. I have every xii og and retro and nothing like it. Its made very poorly. The xiii were done good and the vii and the iv excluding the jumpman
    NIKE Talking Since
    '94
     
  19. inchecksince81

    inchecksince81

    2,210
    10
    Joined
    Feb 12, 2006
    BRED XIII'S FOR ME HANDS DOWN, SAME FIT AND SHAPE IS ON POINT. A LOT OF PEOPLE ON HERE ARE GOING BY LOOKS ALONE. :smh: [​IMG]
     
  20. skylarkster

    skylarkster

    400
    10
    Joined
    Nov 23, 2002
    VIIs should not be mentioned in this thread. They are perhaps the most misshapen retro aside from the 1.

    They haven't released yet but I'll say retro XX1s are gonna come the closest in next year's pack. :lol: [​IMG]
    + L A R K V I L L E +​
    Facebook
    TEAM DENVER NUGGETS
    PROUDLY LOGGING ON TO NT SINCE 2001​
     
  21. fenixconnexion

    fenixconnexion Banned

    1,760
    10
    Joined
    Dec 5, 2006
    AO17 - good comparison with the flint XIIIs there, i never knew there was that much of a huge difference, but i never said flints replicated it's OG haha
    (|TEAM JAYS|)
    A.J. Burnett--Roy Halladay--Troy Glaus--Aaron Hill--Lyle Overbay--Alex Rios--Vernon Wells--Frank Thomas​
     
  22. 2tigerfan3

    2tigerfan3

    154
    10
    Joined
    Apr 13, 2007
    I think the 1994 II lows were the best. The shape was almost perfect, Unlike the recent IIs.
     
  23. ao17

    ao17

    8,383
    725
    Joined
    Apr 23, 2007
    ^ preciate it fenix :lol: [​IMG]
     
  24. mr jack johnson

    mr jack johnson

    146
    10
    Joined
    May 1, 2007
    Strictly from a ballplayers/performance perspective, the retro XII's were NOTHING like the og's. Asthetically they may have looked like the OG, but they didn't play like them.

    For me, that was a major let down.
     
  25. ro22ss

    ro22ss

    609
    29
    Joined
    Jan 11, 2002