- 1,769
- 11
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2007
The call against the raiders went the OTHER way? We do know they would have 1 less championship.
Would we be talking about the Pats right now if?.....
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by curtiscarter23,
- Start date
- 10,056
- 10
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
Brady and Belichick would still be there right??...
- 3,236
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2005
probably.... that one play didn;t create tom brady.
- 7,204
- 13
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
The Raiders still would have lost to the Rams.
- 20,261
- 2,188
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
More than likely, yes.
- 1,769
- 11
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2007
yeah the rams were amazing!
- 238
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2006
It would've only been one less championship. They still would be a dynasty regardless.
- 1,895
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2007
dat sick kid
Banned
- 552
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2007
exactly
that's such dumb question IMO...that's basically attributing EVERYTHING they've accomplished in the last few years (INCLUDING this year'sundefeated records, TD records, etc.) to that one play...it did start the Pats dynasty, but have Brady and co. not met or exceeded expectations after thatyear's SB win? I think so.
Reminiscing back when the Raiders were actually good there, bud?
- 846
- 13
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
they wouldnt have gone undefeated because mossome wouldnt be there
- 1,382
- 13
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- 24,582
- 22,659
- Joined
- May 17, 2007
This game will forever fuel my hatred for the Pats
- 1,092
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2004
EXACTLY. The tuck rule will forever live in infamy in Northern California, especially Oakland. I honestly do not believe the Patriots would be asdominant of an organization as they are now if that call went the other way.Originally Posted by SoHi 23
This game will forever fuel my hatred for the Pats
- 241
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2007
Same here the pats are some cheaters and I don't have any respect for them at ALL.
- 1,382
- 13
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
Originally Posted by Berkeley Boy
EXACTLY. The tuck rule will forever live in infamy in Northern California, especially Oakland. I honestly do not believe the Patriots would be as dominant of an organization as they are now if that call went the other way.Originally Posted by SoHi 23
This game will forever fuel my hatred for the Pats
- 3,486
- 93
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- 105,970
- 51,889
- Joined
- May 31, 2004
i love "what if" statements.....
- 3,108
- 41
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2003
even if that call goes the Raiders way the Pats are still going undefeated this year as far as i'm concerned
- 1,092
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2004
Funny. I am still super salty over that call. Good luck to those Giants btw.Originally Posted by AM 1 FIEND
Originally Posted by Berkeley Boy
EXACTLY. The tuck rule will forever live in infamy in Northern California, especially Oakland. I honestly do not believe the Patriots would be as dominant of an organization as they are now if that call went the other way.Originally Posted by SoHi 23
This game will forever fuel my hatred for the Pats
- 7,993
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2007
Huh?
- 7,204
- 13
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
Question to Raider fans, who would you rather see win, the Chargers or the Pats?
- 24,582
- 22,659
- Joined
- May 17, 2007
Chargers no question.
Like I said, the Pats could pick up my fav. players in the L and I would still utterly despise them.
It doesn't matter if their 16-0 or 0-16, I don't care.
Yeah, I'm mad
- 2,483
- 351
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
This was a long time ago. They still would be good. And yes, The Raiders would have lost to the Rams.
- 24,582
- 22,659
- Joined
- May 17, 2007
Look into your crystal ball and tell me the lottery numbers
- 11,640
- 506
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
Well that really depends. After Brady won that championship he gained a lot of confidence. Who knows if he would've gained the same confidence the nextyear?
Similar threads
