Jordan brand Vs. Nike

Pennys are doper than any kobes an most lebrons. JB will always be in its own category IMO.
 
Originally Posted by RockDeep

Just for Clarification.

Nike does NOT own a % of Jordan Brand.

Nike owns ALL of Jordan Brand. They just cut MJ a HUGE check and MJ has ALOT of say in what goes on....and they consult him on ALL aspects of who works for Jordan in Upper Management.

Also.. it is a slightly false statement that Kobe outsells Jordan.. Kobes Signature may outsell Jordans Signature presently.. especially with Asia behind Kobe the way it is... but as a Brand.. No. Jordan has much more Volume with its Team Line alone which out sell Kobes footwear line.

That is all.

When u say Kobes sig outsells Jordans sig presently, do u mean the Kobe IV vs The 2009? I can see that, but in no way can i imagine that this was true with theKobe III and The XX3....Thanks beforehand for ur response....
 
Originally Posted by Antalonboubmpo

.......... ANOTHER POINTLESS THREAD

roll.gif
 
I don't think we are living in the past, but it doesn't help kobe n LB's case when their shoes are hideous. I'd rather rock hyperdunks all dayeveryday b4 I put ne of their **** on my feet!!!
 
Originally Posted by GreyScaleMethod


Nike has been killing JB for some time now. Quality is an issue with JB right now (shows no sign of returning), but people will continue to buy it nonetheless. It's gonna be a long while before JB actually dies or even "passes the torch". Even though the Kobe & Lebron lines are pretty solid and consistent, I don't think that they will have the longevity after those players retire unlike the Jordan line.


I dont think we can assume that yet. Both of those players are marketing giants, with nike help. Who knows how long theyll last
 
Well I Like Some Nike, Af1. Foams, And All Tht.. . And I Lovee Air Max 95s .. But I'll Choose Jordan Over Them Everyday.
 
Doesn't matter for me if it's Nike or Jordan Brand... if I like them and they feel good, I'll cop 'em & rock 'em.
 
i only liked the LeBron 3s and thats only because they resemble the Jordan11s. i think the other lebrons were ugly. i never liked a Kobe shoe, period. the 2k3was nice but thats not his official sig shoe. Nostalgia does go along way for people that remember the 90s jordan era, we saw some incredible things in Jordanshoes, i think most will agree that from 1-13 JB is solid. Kobe and Lebrons line have long way to go to match that. at the end of the day Jordans legacy cantbe forgotten and it carries over to shoes sales and hype even tho the man has been retired for a while. i think the lebron line has a chance to be great ifthey improve the designs or they should both just switch to JB and wear quality retros all the time with up to date technology. so just keep the same shell ofthe retros but improve the inside technology and materials.
 
When JB dies down I'll just go to what appeals to me just as JB did. There's no doubt that Jordan's line was executed way better than the
modern Jordan and Kobe line. They can't compare, point blank.

Penny's are dope though..
 
Originally Posted by never wear them

JB does not rule on sales.... NUMBERS have it that the Kobe line outsells lebron and JB world wide.... Someone bring up the reports please. The thing is... There is no torch... JB is it's own... And Nike will continue to make sig lines... No matter what. But how boring will it be w/o Kobe or lebron in Nike? I think theyll continue the Kobe and lebron line... The Kobe line will be known as the basketball section and the lebron line will continue but more on the looking appeal side of things... My 2 cents
Agreed. I never knew that the Kobe line did that well though. I never see people with those on.
 
Originally Posted by RockDeep

Just for Clarification.

Nike does NOT own a % of Jordan Brand.

Nike owns ALL of Jordan Brand. They just cut MJ a HUGE check and MJ has ALOT of say in what goes on....and they consult him on ALL aspects of who works for Jordan in Upper Management.

Also.. it is a slightly false statement that Kobe outsells Jordan.. Kobes Signature may outsell Jordans Signature presently.. especially with Asia behind Kobe the way it is... but as a Brand.. No. Jordan has much more Volume with its Team Line alone which out sell Kobes footwear line.

That is all.
I didnt know nike owned all of jb still ,, thx for the insight..........
 
Originally Posted by nflowshoe


Jordan Signature Line is known as the best shoe line ever! Penny Hardaway line had a spark when it started and is great but doesn't add up, Barkely line is ok,

And the Lebron line is to bulky at times and the line seems like its getting boring, and the way he switches from his signature shoe to his team shoe in the playoffs kills it for me.

Which brings me to the Kobe line, If you compare its first 4 shoes to the Jordan line first 4 shoes, and think of the way the Jordan 3 changed the shoe game, the kobe iv did just the same thing , I think if the Kobe line comes correct on 5 and 6 I think the Jordan line retro hype will finally die down, because people are beasting for the kobe iv's more than any Jordan sig./retro as far back as I can remember.

Questions for NIKE TALK

1.Do you feel that Jordan brand has taking away from the Lebron and Kobe line?, we are living in the past with retros

2.When will we finally past the torch? We complain about quality and performance with the Jordan line, but there are other signature shoes out their with great quality and perform better and better every year and we stay on this forum complaining!

Please explain to me how any Kobe shoe has changed the shoe game "the way the Jordan 3 did" or any signature Jordan for that matter...Man, Iswear...A guy finally wins a championship in which he's NOT the sidekick and all of a sudden not only is he comparable as a player to MJ but his shoes havethe same impact as the AJ line.....
eyes.gif
 
ok first of all the kobe's and lebrons are way better than n e jordans quality wise but as far as fashion jordans are molly woppin dem. but yea der aredefinately other shoes out there that are better than jordans but ppl sumtimes are too nieve or too stubborn to take off the jordans and try sum else. o wellcan't change ppl so start wit yaself. good post doe.
 
when I said the kobe iv changed the game like the jordan 3, I meant in the way that the kobe iv is a low cut shoe that went in a diffrent direction thaneverybody else ,like when the jordan 3 came out it was a low cut shoe when ever thing back then was hightop.

When I say hype I mean basketball shoes are suppose to be for basketball, performance wise Nike is killing JB the zoom bb was better than the jordan xx3 butthe hype of the 23rd edition shoes had people buying 200 dollars sneakers (that hurt your feet when you play) while the bb sat on shelves. Im not reallytalking about looks im talking more about performance. If it wasnt for retros, JB would be finished cause none of their newer models PERFOMANCE wise can keepup with nike. I wish JB would put out a shoe that out performs any shoe on the b-ball market at the time, when you guys say jb is better what are you basing iton?
 
nikes go so much more fed than Jordan right now... both in quality and style..

griffeys, barkleys, kobes, lebrons, air max (95s, 97s, and 1s)

for jordan, you got horrible packages, horrible quality, and funky releases... the best quality in the recent past has been team jordans and fusions...

its name is the only thing keepin it around. kids walk into stores sayin "i want jordans" not because they want retros... they just want anythingthat has the jumpman on it.
 
Originally Posted by prettymack1989

ok first of all the kobe's and lebrons are way better than n e jordans quality wise but as far as fashion jordans are molly woppin dem. but yea der are definately other shoes out there that are better than jordans but ppl sumtimes are too nieve or too stubborn to take off the jordans and try sum else. o well can't change ppl so start wit yaself. good post doe.

preach, family... its crazy how a kid will take a dentro low over some barkleys or kobes... only cuz that jumpman...
 
Interesting topic, Kobe had 2 different companies endorsing him so far in his career and MJ only had one. Also, MJ has his own logo (No Swoosh), while Kobedoes have his own logo; he still has the big Swoosh going across the side panel. But most importantly, MJ changed the game of basketball AND the game ofsneakers. Too much history behind the Legend. I'm not taking anything away from Kobe but he will never be on MJ's level. Ever.
 
I understand that everyone has there own opinion on what they like and what product they feel is better, but to say that ANY Kobe shoe has "changed thegame" at all is debateable at best. Saying that any Kobe shoe has done what ANY Jordan shoe has done is just plain ridiculous amd past the point ofopinionated. This kind of statement is what happens when your bias has clouded rational thinking until the point where you post your feelings rather than whatwe all know is factual.

But I understand now seeing as the op is from Cali....
laugh.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom