Oh I'm sorry, Did I Break Your Conversation........Well Allow Me A Movie Thread by S&T

^
I was asking about Emily in the official thread but no one responded. Saw her on tv this morning looking good and she talked about what her role was. My bae Carrie **** was doing interviews too. Nice women in that movie, will see it next week.

Wow, I guess her last name is censored.
 
Last edited:
^
Wth? You should be banned for that comment. Those thangs always look good. At least that confirms she's nude in it.
 
She does nothing for me, and frankly has ugly over sized areola's / nipples from what we see in the film. That's a turn off of me.

Well, now I have to see the movie purely in my capacity as a breast, including nipples, connoisseur to judge Emily's for myself.
 
Writing someone off because of areola & nipple size... :lol: I guess Alexandra Daddario from HBO's True Detective is outta the question for Venom also... :tongue:

To each his/her own...
 
Ben Affleck would completely fail playing Jobs anyway.

Why do people just hate on BA for no reason. Sure he's had some really ****** roles, but I would say more good than bad. Gone girl will be amazing. So will batman v superman
Why you so sensitive for Affleck? It's just my opinion. I actually am a fan of dude. That's not gonna change my view of him suggested for certain roles. I have plenty of reasons for why he would suck as Jobs if you want to get in to it, all based on seeing him in most of his other movies.

I think he'd suck playing Steve Jobs in a movie.

Don't mean he sucks in general. You aint even seen Gone Girl or Batman vs. Superman talking about how amazing he will be in them :smh: One thing worse than a hater is a stan.
 
Last edited:
I think for Ben, it's a question of whether he has the range to play a historical character. Not saying he does or doesn't have the ability, but it's difficult to be able to pickup the subtle nuances of a real life person & sell that to an audience in a believable way.
 
Affleck isn't built to play Steve Jobs. Few people are. You need to be so different for a lack of a better word. Jobs would walk over to your desk, tell you what you've been working on for the past 2 weeks is **** and then in a meeting 3 days later he'd praise your idea as his very own. I could see Leo having that ability, but he doesn't possess the look for Jobs. I can't see Affleck doing stuff like that without it coming off as a comedy.
 
Dude that's exactly what I mean :lol: he'd come off like that the whole movie and it would feel like we're watching something directed by Judd Apatow.
 
not to like be a **** or anything, but this american sniper trailer and the reactions elicited is exactly what i was talking about earlier this week. break it down guys. you just saw a woman and child arm themselves against a sniper. so many levels of wrong and sadness there and i feel like the terror of war, especially war in the middle east, is being lost and swept under the rug by propaganda and the glorification of violence. and don't even get me on how little sense it makes to have the woman walk into plain sight from a building to give the kid the weapon why didn't the kid have the weapon from the jump? clint eastwood, this film is not for me.
The excitement and tenseness is due to the compelling nature of the scene. The suspense of will he shoot or not, and all of the ramifications of are they terrorists or not. He doesn't shoot and they are and all those guys on the ground probably die or nothing happens. He does shoot and he stops an attack or he just killed two innocent ppl that happen to live in a war zone.

These are common things in story telling. Your problem seems to be that they're based on things on real life or reflecting the world outside your window.

Again, while I can understand your stance of Hollywood profiting from this, promoting it solely as entertainment, glorifying violence, etc. you can't hide from this stuff. It's happening whether you know it or not. Heads in the sand won't work. Human beings are a violent ppl and because of that violence can be a form of entertainment.
not to like be a **** or anything, but this american sniper trailer and the reactions elicited is exactly what i was talking about earlier this week. break it down guys. you just saw a woman and child arm themselves against a sniper. so many levels of wrong and sadness there and i feel like the terror of war, especially war in the middle east, is being lost and swept under the rug by propaganda and the glorification of violence. and don't even get me on how little sense it makes to have the woman walk into plain sight from a building to give the kid the weapon why didn't the kid have the weapon from the jump? clint eastwood, this film is not for me.

I hear you.
This sniper is about to be a Rockstar.
He will be(the real guy) on every magazine cover, talk show and award show Red Carpet come Oscar time.
Are they really celebrating a "hero" or desensitizing America to how invading the Middle East is protecting our Freedom when it is quite possibly the furthest thing from the truth.
I will say this aint the first time or the last.

America has vilified the Japanese for WW2, Koreans for that war, Viatmense for that war, Chinese for communism, Russians, etc. It's common practice. There's messages and themes behind a lot of it on macro or micro levels. If the Germans weren't so in the wrong I'm sure they'd make nazi movies about how the evil Europeans tried to take everything from them, how they fought back, and the big bad Americans came and stomped and too credit for everything.

It's really about finding the line with what movies are blatant propaganda and others that are balanced.

I don't think Clint is directing a movie where the war will be viewed in a favorable light or that this soldier will see himself as a hero for what he's done. Very few soldiers do that have done multiple tours and taken multiple lives. I'm sure not everyone who watched the trailer were hyped for the same reasons.



Affleck isn't built to play Steve Jobs. Few people are. You need to be so different for a lack of a better word. Jobs would walk over to your desk, tell you what you've been working on for the past 2 weeks is **** and then in a meeting 3 days later he'd praise your idea as his very own. I could see Leo having that ability, but he doesn't possess the look for Jobs. I can't see Affleck doing stuff like that without it coming off as a comedy.
It's why I was curious and a bit hype to see if Leo could do it.

I know Bale could do it or one of those obvious great flexible actors but to me it's a role about a real life guy that's died pretty recently so it's up in the air if you don't get it 100% right.

Affleck though? Nah. Stiff as all hell the way I'm trying to envision him.
 
Last edited:
Of the names I've heard are still in the running for Jobs, Bale seems like the best option. He's the chops and I think could come closer to the look anyone else.
 
Leo has more star power, but I think Bale is the better actor. I'm not sure about Danny Boyle directing though...
 
Gone Girl was absolutely brilliant, can't say enough about it.


Saw it last night, flawless performances by Affleck, Pike & ****. Very great writing and Fincher is always on point stylistically and I love his vision.


Tyler Perry was very good as well, NPH gonna always NPH.


Emily Ratajofkneushjjfkjsvyy though. :pimp: :pimp:
 
Well, now I have to see the movie purely in my capacity as a breast, including nipples, connoisseur to judge Emily's for myself.


oversized rola's? niceeee :pimp:


Writing someone off because of areola & nipple size... :lol: I guess Alexandra Daddario from HBO's True Detective is outta the question for Venom also... :tongue:

To each his/her own...


Venom can't handle those silver dollars.

LOL Fincher and co. will take any and all dollars from whatever motivation yall need to see the film lol
 
Daenerys Targarayan's boobs though when she was getting in that bath before her brother was getting her ready to trade to the Dothraki and Kahl Drogo...man hold up, greatness. I love her
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom