Someone Blow My Mind Vol. Illuminati, 2012, Aliens, Life

Status
Not open for further replies.
1000


The ichthyosaurs were marine predators that looked like modern dolphins, and could reach a massive size during the Triassic period over 200 million years ago.Shastasaurus, the largest marine reptile species ever found, was a variety of ichthyosaur that could grow to over 65 feet (20m), much longer than most other predators. But one of the largest creatures to ever swim the the sea wasn’t exactly a fearsome predator; Shastasaurus was a specialized suction feeder, eating mainly fish.

1000


Dakosaurus was first discovered in Germany and, with its odd reptilian-yet-fishy body, was one of the top predators in the sea during the Jurassic period.Fossil remains have been found across a very widespread distribution, turning up everywhere from England to Russia to Argentina. Though it is commonly compared to modern crocs, Dakosaurus could reach a length of 16 feet (5m). Its unique teeth have led scientists to consider it an apex predator during its reign of terror.

1000


Thalassomedon was a species of Pliosaur whose name translates from Greek to “sea lord” – and for good reason. They were massive predators, reaching lengths of up to 40 feet (12m).Its flippers were nearly 7 feet (2m) long, allowing it to swim the depths with deadly efficiency. Its reign as a top predator lasted through the late Cretaceous period, finally coming to an end when the sea saw new and larger predators like the Mosasaur.

1000


Nothosaurus, only about 13 feet (4m) long, were aggressive hunters. They were armed with a mouth full of sharp, outward-pointing teeth, suggesting a diet of squid and fish. Nothosaurus is thought to have mainly been an ambush predator, using its sleek reptilian figure to sneak up on prey and take it by surprise.It’s believed that Nothosaurs were related to pliosaurs, another variety of deep sea predators. Fossil evidence suggests that they lived during the Triassic period over 200 million years ago.

1000


Tylosaurus was a species of Mosasaur. It was enormous, reaching more than 50 feet (15m) in length.The tylosaurus was a meat eater with a very diverse diet. Stomach remains show signs of fish, sharks, smaller mosasaurs, plesiosaurs, and even some flightless birds. They lived during the late Cretaceous in the seas that covered North America, where they sat firmly atop the marine food chain for several million years.

1000


Only recently discovered, T. saurophagis was the size of a school bus, reaching nearly 30 feet (9m) long. It is an early species of ichthyosaur that lived during the Triassic period, 244 million years ago. Because they were alive shortly after the Permian extinction (Earth’s largest mass extinction, when 95% of marine life is thought to have been wiped out), its discovery is giving scientists new insights into the quick recovery of the ecosystem.

1000


While Tanystropheus was not strictly marine, its diet was mainly fish and scientists think it spent most of its time in the water. Tanystropheus was a reptile that could reach 20 feet (6m) long, and it is thought to have been alive during the Triassic period nearly 215 million years ago.

1000


Liopleurodon was a marine reptile measuring in at more than 20 (6m) feet in length. It mostly lived in the seas that covered Europe during the Jurassic period, and it was one of the top predators around. Its jaws alone are believed to have been over 10 feet long – roughly the distance from the floor to the ceiling.With teeth that big, it’s easy to see why Liopleurodon dominated the food chain.

1000


If the Liopleurodon was huge, than Mosasaurus was colossal.Fossil evidence suggests that Mosasaurus could reach as much as 50 feet (15m) in length, making it one of the largest marine predators of the Cretaceous period. Mosasaurus’s head was like that of a crocodile, lined with hundreds of razor sharp teeth which could kill even the most well-armored enemies.

1000


One of the largest predators in marine history and one of the largest sharks ever recorded, Megalodons were as terrifying as they came.Megalodons prowled the depths during the Cenozoic Era, 28 – 1.5 million years ago, and were a much bigger version of the great white shark, an apex predator of today’s oceans. But while our great whites only reach a maximum length of 20 feet (6m), Megolodons could grow to 65 feet in length (20m) – longer than a school bus!

wow. nice. this gets my mind.
 
^ well, here's moar...

reconstruction of a large megalodon jawbone:


1000



they used to have one of these on display in a museum near me
it's been said that the megalodon had the strongest bite force of any animal ever known & could crush the skull of a whale like a grape


here's a smaller reconstruction compared to a great white shark jawbone:


1000



the details surrounding the megalodon's extinction are still unknown :nerd:
 
^ well, here's moar...

reconstruction of a large megalodon jawbone:


1000



they used to have one of these on display in a museum near me
it's been said that the megalodon had the strongest bite force of any animal ever known & could crush the skull of a whale like a grape


here's a smaller reconstruction compared to a great white shark jawbone:


1000



the details surrounding the megalodon's extinction are still unknown :nerd:

damn, what was the myth and legend about atlantis? This seems so cool. i watched the mermaid thing on discovery a while back as well as the giant squid. once in a while, youll hear how fishermen land weird and ancient creatures. has anyone gone down to the ocean floor in the ocean?

the abyss is a trip. u have creaturea living off weird gasses and crazy pressure. u have no light either. i wonderr if its actually warm at those depths near the magma core?
 
ya, there are things that live at crazy temperatures down there as well

atlantis is a whole topic on its own
 
Last edited:
I've heard that Atlantis was an allegory made by Plato for the structure of how a society (like our current one) can run successfully without revolution. Anyone else ever come across that?
 
I've heard that Atlantis was an allegory made by Plato for the structure of how a society (like our current one) can run successfully without revolution. Anyone else ever come across that?

I read it was more like an actual powerful mini civilization in that area that got destroyed by some tsunami. The similar adaptation found in the Old Testament.
 
I read it was more like an actual powerful mini civilization in that area that got destroyed by some tsunami. The similar adaptation found in the Old Testament.

Yes, that's the more popular and desired theory. I've also heard that the mini civilization was populated by all right brain functioning enlightened beings who could move objects through walls and build structures by collectively using their minds in some sort of meditation. And that it wasn't a tsunami that destroyed the civilization but people from Mars who landed on their island after destroying their own planet due to greed and ego thus ultimately leading to the demise of Atlantis.

All sexy ideas. But you know..haha.
 
i would agree with the idea that the earth evolving at the teresstrial level to be more believeable than aliens
 
i would agree with the idea that the earth evolving at the teresstrial level to be more believeable than aliens

I'm with you on that. I mean placebo is a great example of what the mind is capable of. I read an article abut a double blind placebo study where they took 50 patients that needed arthroscopic knee surgery and they gave half the surgery and the other half they only cut open and told them they had gotten the surgery. All patients recovered the same as if they had gotten surgery simply because they believed they had gotten it. That alone makes me wonder what else is possible. And if mankind has ever been aware about the power of the mind and was able to do more extraordinary thinG's that transcend the physical and even the astral.
 
I dont necessarily agree or disagree but to say pretend and believe are synonymous is a little disingenuous. The key distinction between the definitions you posted is one is inherently false and the other is not. You go on to compare ET to santa and the Easter bunny. You are displaying the same bias and emotional preconceptions you talk about. You already believe they don't exist therefore equating them to figures whose existence violates the laws of physics is not a large leap for you. I don't mean to come down on you at all cause I love your posts but this is not sound reasoning.

the scientific method, or verifiable proof is hindered and it's utility limited by the ability to gather evidence and perform experiments. But for a scientist its always "true" or "false" and never "not smart enough".

The comparison was just between things that in one time or another people believed to be real without any evidence or proof; reality is relative. We know Santa or the Easter Bunny don't exist now, but at one point we did believe in them. We know Thor doesn't exist now, but at one point humans in a particular part of the world in a certain time period believed in them. My only point is that reality is relative. I have no bias.

my only point is no one believes in those things cause they are flawed logic and the concept violates physical law. Can you say the same for ET? Additionally, believing is entirely different than pretending but of course you know that. I think your bias is clear. You sound like the atheists that argue til their latest breath just to say "I don't know". No **** you don't know.
 
The keyword is concept. My argument was never if intelligent life forms were possible or not but that there is ZERO evidence to prove that they do exist.

You can dance around that point as much as you'd like and pick and reach for flaws in the argument that aren't the entire point (haven't seen you bring up Thor), but until you provide evidence my point remains. It is a belief.
 
Anybody have anything on museums?


I read that only like 5% of what they own gets displayed.



Makes you wonder what they have hidden and are not allowed to show.


Mostly stuff about giants.
 
Last edited:
The keyword is concept. My argument was never if intelligent life forms were possible or not but that there is ZERO evidence to prove that they do exist.

You can dance around that point as much as you'd like and pick and reach for flaws in the argument that aren't the entire point (haven't seen you bring up Thor), but until you provide evidence my point remains. It is a belief.

Aristotle said, "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without believing it." There is zero evidence to prove that all these visions you have while taking drugs are anything more than your own imagination. But yet you "BELIEVE" otherwise. This enlightenment you always speak of, wheres the proof? Why would you "BELIEVE" in enlightenment?

See what I'm saying? Everyone has their beliefs based on their own experiences, in a thread like this especially. To come in here and tell people they are pretending and might as well be discussing Santa Claus or the easter bunny is a bit condescending. You shouldn't assume your belief's are so much more valid than others.

I don't even have an opinion about aliens, I'm ambivalent on the subject honestly. I don't think anyone should just blindly accept or believe anything. But I also don't think scientific proof or evidence is the authority in every facet of human life.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom