Is Gay For Pay Still Gay?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ohmygosher

Banned
8,072
2,447
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
I remember watching (I think) True Life a couple years back and it featured a guy that did gay porn, but identified as being a straight heterosexual male.

So my question is would this person be considered gay even if everything else about them is not? Do the means justify the end?

Serious discussion please.

#deathtoTAN
 
if you want to be a hooker than be all you can be.

if you mess with men you're gay, there are no special clauses, or asterisks.
 
I guess technically someone could not be gay to do that as a profession. But even though he isn’t gay, he’s doing a gay act which is probably just as bad as being gay and that is only to those that think being gay is bad. Hopefully that makes sense.
 
Whre's the gray area? Was it like, Cinemax porn where the crotches don't even line up right or was dude actually airtight? If so, how would it possibly work that he performed actions with another man with the sole and specific intent of directly causing sexual arousal and/or release of said man without being gay?
 
By definition, yes.

As a heterosexual man, partaking in sex with another man is... Gay. Whatever rationale the person uses to dignify their acts is, for the most part, irrelevant because the act itself is what constitutes the homosexuality. I mean, a person can harbor thoughts of another member of the same sex, but if they never act out on it, their claim at being heterosexual is more substantial than that of a person who partakes in homosexual acts.

I remember that episode of true life and thought the guy was gay, regardless of what he claimed.
 
That was on True Life marathon yesterday 
laugh.gif
.  They were showing the "weirdest" True Life episodes all day yesterday. 
 
Unless I'm mistaken, dude wasn't a Cinemax actor, but a legit male/male film star.
 
he a frank ocean.


but umm

OP..

is there something u wanna tell us? :nerd:
 
Last edited:
^ In the "what happened" thread.

Naw, you def were like "see ya'll in a week".
 
Last edited:
By definition, yes.

As a heterosexual man, partaking in sex with another man is... Gay. Whatever rationale the person uses to dignify their acts is, for the most part, irrelevant because the act itself is what constitutes the homosexuality. I mean, a person can harbor thoughts of another member of the same sex, but if they never act out on it, their claim at being heterosexual is more substantial than that of a person who partakes in homosexual acts.

I remember that episode of true life and thought the guy was gay, regardless of what he claimed.
If you identify as heterosexual, but you've never had heterosexual sex, are you straight or gay? Because it seems as if you're claiming it's the action that dictates your sexual orientation... not how you feel or who you're attracted to.
 
By definition, yes.

As a heterosexual man, partaking in sex with another man is... Gay. Whatever rationale the person uses to dignify their acts is, for the most part, irrelevant because the act itself is what constitutes the homosexuality. I mean, a person can harbor thoughts of another member of the same sex, but if they never act out on it, their claim at being heterosexual is more substantial than that of a person who partakes in homosexual acts.

I remember that episode of true life and thought the guy was gay, regardless of what he claimed.
If you identify as heterosexual, but you've never had heterosexual sex, are you straight or gay? Because it seems as if you're claiming it's the action that dictates your sexual orientation... not how you feel or who you're attracted to.
Wait.... So you're saying a dude can beat the brakes off another man's booty, and not be gay if he's not attracted?
 
If you identify as heterosexual, but you've never had heterosexual sex, are you straight or gay? Because it seems as if you're claiming it's the action that dictates your sexual orientation... not how you feel or who you're attracted to.

If you identify as heterosexual, and have not done anything to contradict said identity, then yes.

I'd say the act matters a considerable amount in the context of this thread. A man holds a belief of himself, but conducts in acts that contradict himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom