***Official Political Discussion Thread***

People heard about Da Don's pedo tendencies before the election but that story got buried after the grab her by the privates comment.
 
He was that thirsty over a 12 year old :x

Not the first time he has said something like that.


3957746A00000578-3835421-image-a-1_1476317828582.jpg


Donald Trump was caught on a hot-mic boasting that he would be dating a 10-year-old girl 'in ten years' as he filmed an Entertainment Tonight Christmas Feature in 1992 (above)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...er-revealed-latest-hot-mic-video-surface.html
 
 
  
 
JΞSŦΞR ✪ ΔCŦUAL³³º¹
‏@th3j35t3r

 
 Follow
 
 
More

 

 

 


 
Russians connected w/ dossier, who since 'died'
  
Erovinkin, Krivov, Karlov, Melanin, Chandelon, Polshikov, Churkin
  
Not bad for 'fake news'



 

Mere coincidences.

Especially that guy that had blunt force trauma to his head but his death was ruled a heart attack and his body was released to unknown parties hastily.
Now I want to play Tropico
 
The more I think of this Milo clown the more I get heated. In reality, this is just a temporary "L" for dude, he will get his book published, he will have a new news outlet, he will make even more money on tour, and his platform will grow.

What really has me heated is the liberals, mainly white male liberals, that preach that giving Milo a platform to spew pseudo intellectual hate speech, will at the end of the day ,be a net positive for America. Yes oh yes, hearing his clown mock minorities, make disgusting jokes about the marginalized, and weaponize the summary statistics pages of research papers with little to know blowback is exactly what America needs right now.

And these same ************* will turn around and tell me "Don't be mad at the Rust Belt, they voted for Obama twice, they are just desperate". So I am left to wonder, whether it be Milo or sws in the rust belt, if liberals like Maher and all the other Milo defenders and sympathizers actually want what is best for the minorities in the liberal tent, or is this just a furtive display of tribalism.
 
Last edited:
Like I said before, the **** don't affect them so they can be free to do as they please. The same cats who will write in Harambe or vote for Jill Stein are the same cats givin dude a pass which is an issue I have w/ the "progressive" Democrats. But stuff like this is always at the expense of minorities, mainly black people. And why not, they don't need us until 2018 and 2020 when it's time to "put the past behind us and band together to fight the good fight."

But hey, sticks and stones right.
 
its because they are all white b. they dont know what it feels like to be the ones continually marginalized like POC are. maybe one day more white liberals will understand that one day
 
Like I said before, the **** don't affect them so they can be free to do as they please. The same cats who will write in Harambe or vote for Jill Stein are the same cats givin dude a pass which is an issue I have w/ the "progressive" Democrats. But stuff like this is always at the expense of minorities, mainly black people. And why not, they don't need us until 2018 and 2020 when it's time to "put the past behind us and band together to fight the good fight."

But hey, sticks and stones right.

That it is different bunch imo. Most progressive white democrats mean well and are often misguided,and ignorant to how bad things really are. Yeah they might vote for Stein and Harambe but that is really a **** you at the DNC, not really black people. They just sometimes underestimate the collateral damage of taking risk like these., but still they are the faction of the left coalition will support policy to help the marginalized. They are the ones protesting Milo coming to their campus and will call him a white supremacist to his face, even if they are no equipped to debate him

It is moderate, libertarian leaning democrats that are the problem. They don't mind the boot of white supremacy being eased up a lil, but it has to be on the white man's terms. They act like making sure white people not getting blowback for their comments are equally as important as securing social justice for minorities.

Moderate and Progressives might look the same from time to time, but we have to make sure we don't bunch them together. In the fight for social justice, one group is your natural ally, the other is group that will throw you under the bus without hesitation if it is politically convenient for them.
 
Last edited:
All that is why I'm wary of many of the so called liberals, especially the ones who say this kind of stupid **** knowing they won't be directly effected by it. And then dare to pretend to be intellectually superior to others. There is this smug, masturbatory arrogance coming from a lot of these dudes and I feel like they are too blinded by wanting to seem so kind and liberal to see it.

I already saw it (always lol'd when Gil Scott said "pale faced SDS mf") but it really showed itself when all these white liberals were surprised at the election outcome and Trump's support like marginalized people weren't telling them for decades how ****** up this country is towards minority groups.
 
Exactly, Mexicans are being rounded up n taken out their homes, Muslims are being banned n not allowed into the country, n black folks are still being treated inhumane. But it doesn't matter, because America, at the end of the day, will always protect whites.

Like Farrakhan said, "The seal and the constitution, reflects the thinking of the founding fathers that this was to be a nation by white people, and for white people. Native Americans, Blacks, and all other non-white people, were to be the burden bearers for the real citizens of this nation."
 
had a quick etiquette question for this thread...what are the preferred gender pronouns to use while posting in here?[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]

When addressing trolls like you, we prefer "it"
 
Last edited:
had a quick etiquette question for this thread...what are the preferred gender pronouns to use while posting in here?[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]

For you? Zie works.
 
I don't know why you dignify those idiots with answers when they don't care to answer yours.
 
had a quick etiquette question for this thread...what are the preferred gender pronouns to use while posting in here?[emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji][emoji]128514[/emoji]
You are doing a terrible job at trolling b.
 
Like I said before, the **** don't affect them so they can be free to do as they please. The same cats who will write in Harambe or vote for Jill Stein are the same cats givin dude a pass which is an issue I have w/ the "progressive" Democrats. But stuff like this is always at the expense of minorities, mainly black people. And why not, they don't need us until 2018 and 2020 when it's time to "put the past behind us and band together to fight the good fight."

But hey, sticks and stones right.

That it is different bunch imo. Most progressive white democrats mean well and are often misguided,and ignorant to how bad things really are. Yeah they might vote for Stein and Harambe but that is really a **** you at the DNC, not really black people. They just sometimes underestimate the collateral damage of taking risk like these., but still they are the faction of the left coalition will support policy to help the marginalized. They are the ones protesting Milo coming to their campus and will call him a white supremacist to his face, even if they are no equipped to debate him

It is moderate, libertarian leaning democrats that are the problem. They don't mind the boot of white supremacy being easing up a lil, but it has to be on the white man's terms. They act like making sure white people not getting blowback for their comments are equally as important as securing social justice for minorities.

Moderate and Progressives might look the same from time to time, but we have to make sure we don't bunch them together. In the fight for social justice, one group is your natural ally, the other is group that will throw you under the bus without hesitation if it is politically convenient for them.

But it's hard to separate the two when you have progressives crying about black people playing the race card because it affects their world and their failure to acknowledge the problems that are going on in this country. They'd rather just stay out of it until they feel threatened w/ words from minorities and then they interject.
 
Like I said before, the **** don't affect them so they can be free to do as they please. The same cats who will write in Harambe or vote for Jill Stein are the same cats givin dude a pass which is an issue I have w/ the "progressive" Democrats. But stuff like this is always at the expense of minorities, mainly black people. And why not, they don't need us until 2018 and 2020 when it's time to "put the past behind us and band together to fight the good fight."

But hey, sticks and stones right.

That it is different bunch imo. Most progressive white democrats mean well and are often misguided,and ignorant to how bad things really are. Yeah they might vote for Stein and Harambe but that is really a **** you at the DNC, not really black people. They just sometimes underestimate the collateral damage of taking risk like these., but still they are the faction of the left coalition will support policy to help the marginalized. They are the ones protesting Milo coming to their campus and will call him a white supremacist to his face, even if they are no equipped to debate him

It is moderate, libertarian leaning democrats that are the problem. They don't mind the boot of white supremacy being easing up a lil, but it has to be on the white man's terms. They act like making sure white people not getting blowback for their comments are equally as important as securing social justice for minorities.

Moderate and Progressives might look the same from time to time, but we have to make sure we don't bunch them together. In the fight for social justice, one group is your natural ally, the other is group that will throw you under the bus without hesitation if it is politically convenient for them.

But it's hard to separate the two when you have progressives crying about black people playing the race card because it affects their world and their failure to acknowledge the problems that are going on in this country. They'd rather just stay out of it until they feel threatened w/ words from minorities and then they interject.

-As always, average vs. marginal. Yes there are some ignorance blowhard progressives (I would argue there are more woke ones though) but the progressive faction of the left currently is way more on top things that the moderate left.

-More general comment:

And where I do give progressives the slightest of the breaks, most progressive actually try to make the attempt to be inclusive, their frustration comes from being rebuked even after they feel they have made an attempt to bridge the gap. If we are talking about politicians these are the Bernie's and Bill De Blassio's of the world. Btw, I complain about Bernie a lot on here, but let one of my black friends or family slander him, and I'm bringing out the verbal Draco to ride for Bern.

Moderates don't even make the attempt, they will ***** and complain from the jump. And they will never acknowledge how dangerous their ideology for people of color. These are the Jim Webb's, Bill Clinton's and Mario Cuomo's of the world

-But you're right, it is hard to tell them apart because the whine and complain the same. Some white progressives are too concerned with not being labeled as racist and not concerned enough with being truly pro social justice.
 
Last edited:
This speech was given in 1963 :smh:



Conservatives of all kinds have made it their mission to make sure none of this was completed. And they are winning the battle.

It is ******* shameful that speeches regarding race in 1963, can be applied to modern times.

While people like Barrack Obama are correct when they say that things have gotten better, and that their has been progress, it is important to keep in mind that it only true because of how horrible things where in the past, not because of how great things are now.

And unless liberals of all kinds, or all race and colors resist that Bigot in the White House, America is gonna be remind of how bad things were 50-70 years ago for minorities.
 
I like how the US, n the CIA, destabilized Latin America in the 70s n 80s, so much so, those citizens now risk their lives to travel to a country, whose leaders despise them, in order to seek refuge from the aftermath of said actions. The US, n the CIA, in conjunction with the destabilization of Latin America, also wreaked havoc in the Middle East, during the same time frame, n now refuses to allow refuge to those peoples, adversely affected by the policies n proxy wars, caused by those administrations. All the while, the same country, Russia, that the US acted against, at the time, is now being cozied up to, by the current administration. Meanwhile, this administration fails to remember, these actions were taken in order protect democracy, from the very country, Russia, who has been proven to have meddled with our own democratic election process, in order to aid the current administration into gaining power.

But at least we're making America great again [emoji]128579[/emoji]
 
Back
Top Bottom