I really don't understand why this Sixers stuff is garnering so much negative feedback.
Before the season started...it was a consensus understanding that the Sixers were fielding a poor roster SPECIFICALLY to position themselves for the draft and to maintain financial flexibility. There is no "pretty" way to do that. Why the uproar now? Would it make a difference if they had a few wins in the last 25? No. If the Sixers were better...and say...the 7th or 8th worst team instead of 2nd...then the story would be "they shouldn't have played themselves out of a top 4 pick". Are the Bucks "trying" because they accidentally win 1 game every 10?
SHOULD a team where Thaddeus Young and Byron Mullens are your "vets" have more than 15 wins?