- 15
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
Hey all, just want to double check if these concord lows are legit or not. Let me know what you guys think. Much appreciated.
[LC] Jordan 11 Concord low
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by bigstarzzz,
- Start date
- 640
- 211
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
They look good to me. Jumpmans on the back of the shoes do not touch the patent leather and the 23s on the back of the shoes look good as well.
- 15
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
Thanks Aaron
- 5,692
- 1,762
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
I don't know.. Those soles are pretty blue and the jumpman on the heels look pretty thick...
- 215
- 78
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2014
These are legit. I have a pair and they look exactly like this. (mind you i purchased mine via nike.com.) youre good homie
- 1,927
- 614
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
Those don't look good to me.
Soles look really blue, the 23 looks too big too.
But I may be wrong, those fakes are hard to spot.
Soles look really blue, the 23 looks too big too.
But I may be wrong, those fakes are hard to spot.
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- 7,981
- 4,083
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
These look ok to me. And I'm iffy about these lows just because how bad quality check was. One thing I noticed with these is that the GMs have the same dark pattern box paper that the bred 11s have
ryanjumpman420
Banned
- 12,181
- 1,988
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
These are 100% fake. Soles too blue, pl cut is too high, the inspired Jordan part on the tongue is off, jumpmen are both mishapped.
- 164
- 81
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
the jumpman does look too fat but take a pic of the jumpman with the flash on. the jumpman should thin out with thicker stitching on the front leg and very thin on back leg.
- 15
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
hmmm getting some mixed emotions with this legit check. Here are some additional photo's of it without the light on in my room
Here is with the flash on
Rumble Gang
formerly retrohead182
- 7,981
- 4,083
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
I strongly think you're good here fam. Where did you get them from?
ryanjumpman420
Banned
- 12,181
- 1,988
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
Soles are way too blue. 99% sure these are fake. Jus move on to another pair. There are TONS of 100% legit pairs of these out there for sale. But there are also TONS of fakes of these as well.
ryanjumpman420
Banned
- 12,181
- 1,988
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
Retail purchased pair. Use pic for reference.View media item 982419
- 15
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
I bought them off a local re-seller.
- 164
- 81
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
View media item 982462View media item 9824631st pic with flash 2nd without. Soles look more clear with flash more blue without. But everything else looks good. Rounded not square 23 tab like I've seen on other posts. Heel pl cut looks good. Your Jumpman is slightly thicker with flash on. I got mine from footaction and the heel seam is slightly misaligned so not every pair is perfect. Tbh this one is hard. Soles are too blue imo.
- 164
- 81
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
I would move on like what was said earlier. Due to jumpman and Soles. To much of a gamble imo especially if they charging over retail.
ryanjumpman420
Banned
- 12,181
- 1,988
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
Production dates i have seen on legit pairs have all been from 11/2013 to 3/2014. Another flag on these pairs listed being that they have 1/2014 as the ending production date on the tag leads me to believe these were prob early releases/fakes. And the majority of fakes ive seen come through here have been dated 11/2013 to 1/2014 and jus adds to the suspicion.
Last edited:
- 305
- 46
- Joined
- May 20, 2013
IMO.....The 23s look too low.
- 3,469
- 855
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
I honestly can't decide..first set of pics made me say fake, 2nd changed my mind. post a pic of the jumpman on the top of the box
- 1,927
- 614
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
Got the same feeling, don't know what to think about those
- 15
- 10
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2014
- 164
- 81
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
GMs
- 1,927
- 614
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
To compare with, here are some pictures of my legit box:
I don't see anything wrong with those now
Last edited:
- 164
- 81
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2014
its the arms. look at the detail on the box @raphp posted and the lack of detail on bigstarzzz box. the wristband, muscles, etc. both boxes should be identical, its like a stamp. all the boxes i have are like raphp's. more detailed. thats why im saying GM added with other discrepancies. its extremely subtle, most people will not notice but they are not the same jumpman.
ryanjumpman420
Banned
- 12,181
- 1,988
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
Told yall these were fake
Similar threads
