Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)

How many pairs will you be copping?

  • "1" is all I need.

    Votes: 3 17.6%

  • 2. One to rock, One to stock.

    Votes: 8 47.1%

  • 3+. I need to hoard for no valid reason.

    Votes: 5 29.4%

  • 0. No OG Box? PASS.

    Votes: 1 5.9%
  • Total voters
    17
Show All
Still haven't found my size for a price that I'm willing to pay...but I was able to grab a pair of DS Black Toes for $320 today. Wish I could find some Chi's for that price.
 
23GOAT said:
Yea, that is another thing that bothers me too and no, I didn't pay retail which makes it worse. Then again, I gotta calm it down a bit and not act too surprised of Jordan Brand workmanship. Aside from appearance of the black stitch poppin' through some holes, I don't think it'll come apart or anything like that. I think these will just go back in the for sale lot, lol.
Click to expand...

Yeah I considered trying to move mine, but with a noticeable flaw it would be harder. People are going to file a paypal claim saying they're fake or some ********. I'm likely just gonna rock mine and try to get over the flaws.
 
bbestsb said:
Nevermind the bleed... what's up with the black stitching coming through in spots? Don't think that can really be fixed.
Click to expand...
isnt this just gaps in the rubber in between the stitching? happens on rubber outsole nikes...just not usually that bad...

not noticeable on foot tho:rolleyes
 
Last edited:
Saw a pair of Ray Allen 13s posted for like $200 in a size nine a week ago. Knew it was complete ********. Pay heed to the fellas above. Be careful.
 
MF Gooze said:
You're doing it wrong.
Click to expand...
Is that what she said? 
happy.gif
 
casper90403 said:
man, who remembers the Ray Allen 13 thread?

Another great thread in NT history.

So many people got took on that one. I'd be very careful man.
Click to expand...

I think the Ray thread is when many on NT really learned about GMs and fakes
 
Last edited:
I have the '94's, 13's, and 2 pairs of the '15's. I really do love the '15's quite a bit., flaws and all.

IMO, I do think the '13's are hated on a bit too much. Yeah the leather is inferior compared to the '94 and '15, but I still like them a lot. They're definitely going into the casual rotation. I also don't mind the jumpman logo on the tongue (only the heel jumpman is slightly annoying).
 
I am tying to buy a pair from a reseller on IG. Are Lacebags, widows peak in front/back and laces not tied tight inside the bag the big give aways for fakes on these as well? Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
1994airjordan said:
View media item 1575669
2013s> 2015s

*easier to cop
*initial low price (110) and low resell market value
*red leather hits are brighter than 2015s
*comfortable as heck when you break em in
*leather tongue supports the structure of shoe when worn. 2013s are more stout on feet than 2015s
*jumpman tags represent pre NA1 hype. Those who own 2013s are true fans of silhouette. This is an iconic shoe no matter what company on tags. Still got Nike on bottom tho
Click to expand...
i respect ur opinions usually, but nice try on this one...


*cues mj space jam REACH gif*
:rofl:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Legit check Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Next Chapter
Replies
7
Views
5K
anthos
anthos

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom