The Official Adidas D Lillard 1

What's the problem you're having? 9.5 able to add to cart and get to payment part. Can't check out after submitting payment or what?
 
Last edited:
hyunsoochoi3 said:
 
I've only played in the CLB 2015, no Lillard Boost, but the forefoot cushioning was very lackluster in my opinion. The disparity between the boost in the heel and the lack of cushion in the forefoot may have exaggerated it a bit more, but overall I like the Bounce full-length better by miles. And of course Bounce is nothing like zoom in terms of responsiveness but to me it's a great balance of court feel and response. 
Click to expand...
I have to agree with this. I didn't care for the CLB 2015 for the same reason, even with replacing the insole. I've had a much better run with the Lillard 2 and really like full length Bounce. 
 
  • Like
Reactions: God
Finally got a chance to wear them on the court, I played at the dusty court todY and they held up well. Not much slippage so I'm happy with the purchase. I bought the Static's.

The only bad thing is they're very "2016 Hyperrev-like" to get on.
 
aivc said:
nflowshoe said:
Does the Lillard 2 primeknit boost have the same exact bottom as the 2015 crazy light and 2.5 crazy light? How was the fore foot cushioning?
Click to expand...
Same mid/outsole as the 2015/2.5 crazylight, yep. 
Forefoot cushioning felt very adequate to me. Just enough cushion for comfort, but not too much to the point where you lose valuable court feel.
I personally couldn't differentiate in a blind test for the forefoot feel/cushion between StableFrame and Bounce.
Click to expand...

Nah, I don't believe this for one second. There is a night and day difference between bounce and the cl boost setup. I've played in both.
 
I'm heard that from multiple peeps now. My forefoot must be really wrong. In any case, I  decided the give the regular lillard 2.0 another try on a pristine court this time.

I also modified the outsole on them : cut about half of the rubber ridges off. The main complain was that the pattern was too tight, so I wanted to see if I could solve that but lowering the density of the pattern. Will report back.
 
VetteZ06 said:
Patrik1tha1 said:
Nah, I don't believe this for one second. There is a night and day difference between bounce and the cl boost setup. I've played in both.
Click to expand...

Which one's better?
Click to expand...

That's up to your personal preference.

For me, the full length bounce is the closest thing I've found to my favorite ball shoe of all time, the Kobe 5.

Bounce is low enough to the ground, responsive and you still get court feel. The traction wasn't an issue for me personally on either shoe and I play on dusty 24hr fitness courts.

Cl boost set up is very minimal in the forefoot with the boost in the heel which didn't do much for me. Solid shoe which I don't mind, but I just can't begin to grasp how dude said he wouldn't be able to tell the difference between the 2.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

therealest1
Converse Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Thread
Replies
0
Views
202
therealest1
therealest1
therealest1
Adidas T-Mac 5 Retro
Replies
2
Views
1K
therealest1
therealest1
therealest1
Nike Ja 2 - Holiday 2024
Replies
10
Views
4K
nikekid6
nikekid6
therealest1
Nike Caitlin Clark Signature Shoe - 2025
Replies
23
Views
2K
jumpman cbt2
jumpman cbt2
therealest1
Jordan Tatum 3 - Holiday 2024
Replies
6
Views
2K
kyngpen413
kyngpen413

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom