BORDEAUX 7S JULY 18th 2015

stevedensmore said:
PmpDaddyRobFord said:
I'm not a female
we might have somethin to say about some other stuff later on. just you have no point complaining so damn much cuz it won't do anything to a billion dollar company
Click to expand...

Fair enough. Though, you're wrong about us not being able to do anything about a multi-billion dollar company's false advertising deception. Like someone else here already mentioned, Sony, who was actually worth more than Nike at the time, faced the consequences.

http://www.ftc.gov/news-events/pres...ntertainment-america-provide-consumer-refunds
Click to expand...
think that it being a electronic device over some shoes was easier to prove their case tho. some little minor issues with paint or w/e I don't see it holding much ground especially when official pics of a shoe are shown before release so you can already see what you're getting despite what they said before about the program. they're getting the shape and shades closer so there's that.
 
DA HEN said:
Absolutely. I inspect every pair that I get, but once I wear them for the first time those imperfections are completely meaningless. Well said.
Click to expand...
Thanks bruh. Glad you agree. 
pimp.gif
 
stevedensmore said:
The7onius said:
How you even comparing functions that was listed on an electrical device to what you consider remastered on a shoe? The two aren't the same so basing your argument off what happened to Sony is pointless.
Click to expand...

Please have someone read and explain this to you since it seems you're incapable of doing so...

"Every pair produced under the Retro Remaster regime will pass through over 100 sets of hands before it gets boxed up and unleashed to eager sneaker consumers at retail. As the shoes go from one step of the intricate process to the next, each person that handles them wears white cotton gloves to keep the product as pristine as possible. Whether it’s cutting materials, lining up edges, or molding the shape, everything has to be absolutely perfect before it can get the green light to move on to the next stage of production."
Click to expand...
Being condescending still doesn't explain how you compare your idea of remastered to Sony falsely promising a function on an electrical device. You're under the delusion that everyone should agree with you and your arrogance won't get you too far, people may agree with you but won't act on it just because you're not the right individual to represent the cause you're fighting for.
 
Gambit11 said:
You complaining, Everyone in the world except you apparently knew that the "remastered" stuff was just a word thrown out for a price hike. All a gimmick. All the quality issues that JB's kicks have has been going on for years. No reason why suddenly it was going to change. You know what you're getting into when you're buying Jordans. Stop buying them.
Click to expand...
Preach!!!!
 
Fam I just returned my pair to my FNL, and shorty gave me the regular retail plus tax back in cash. I used a WC rewards on these! Now if they'll give me that rewards back is the question that still stands. Now we wait
 
Last edited:
NobleKane said:
Most the hate is because of the erection in sweatpants look the toe box has which your pair has aswell
Click to expand...
My pair is flawless. I'm 6'7 I can't see that looking down and it actually makes the Toe POP OUT. Hares and 2011 had the slim look which is not OG. I have the Hares as well. 2011 Were bulky and the shape was no where near OGs. I'm 100% Satisfied with my Cop. to each their own. I don't like Non OGs and all this wild stuff out here but some people thats all they buy. 
 
fLOurishngFlash said:
I wish I could tell you that. This is what greeted me upon taking the left shoe (the first one I saw after unwrapping the paper!) out of the box.
Click to expand...

I think they did a terrible job of stuffing the shoe and in return alot of pairs creased during movement and over time in box

Instead of stuffing with paper they used card board
 
ChefwitJays said:
My pair is flawless. I'm 6'7 I can't see that looking down and it actually makes the Toe POP OUT. Hares and 2011 had the slim look which is not OG. I have the Hares as well. 2011 Were bulky and the shape was no where near OGs. I'm 100% Satisfied with my Cop. to each their own. I don't like Non OGs and all this wild stuff out here but some people thats all they buy. 
Click to expand...

You cant see from the top rather from the side.

Its been a long time since i was a kid and had og bordeauxs but i can tell you one thing. They didnt popout like these do.

I dont mind because i like the soft durabuck they used but they should have stuffed the shoes with paper instead of cardboard. That way it would have kept its shape and people would crease them on their own
 
NobleKane said:
Oh is it?

When you dont want your product bought by a certain demograph i beg to differ
Click to expand...
find another source besides celebrity.com because that **** is not valid or a credible source.
NobleKane said:
Both my 2011 and 2015 pair are flawless although my 2011 pair seems to be suede cuz its kinda ashy in the grey
Click to expand...
Ok, that's nice.  I know the black part of the upper is durabuck but are the light graphite part nubuck?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Thread Gallery

View Full Gallery

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom