Adele's manager: 'Streaming's the future, whether people like it or not'

7,494
663
Joined
Feb 18, 2010
But Jonathan Dickins wants Spotify to change policy of not allowing some albums to be restricted to paying subscribers only


Adele’s last album took its time to reach streaming music services. Photograph: Richard Young/REX/Richard Young/REX


Adele’s manager has backed streaming services like Spotify as the future of music, but warned the company that it may need to change its policy of insisting all albums be made available on both its free and premium tiers.

“Personally, I think streaming’s the future, whether people like it or not, but I don’t believe one size necessarily fits all with streaming,” said Jonathan Dickins, speaking at the Web Summit conference in Dublin this afternoon.

He was responding to a question about Taylor Swift’s back catalogue being removed from Spotify earlier in the week.

“Spotify have always been pictured as the bad guys in this, but the biggest music streamer out there is YouTube, without a doubt,” he said, pointing out that when artists or labels remove music from Spotify, it is often still easy to find it on YouTube.

“If I make a search now for Taylor Swift on YouTube, give me 30 seconds and I can have the whole Taylor Swift album there streamed. Some of it’s ad-supported, so there is revenue, and some of it’s not,” he said.

“On the one hand, labels are trumpeting YouTube as a marketing tool: 10 million views on YouTube and it’s a marketing stroke of genius. But on the other hand they’re looking at 10 million streams on Spotify and saying that’s x amount of lost sales.”

He elaborated on his theory that one size doesn’t fit all when it comes to streaming, suggesting that Spotify could “make it easier for themselves” by relenting in its policy of having albums available to all its users, rather than allowing some to be restricted to its paying customers.

“The premium tier to me are real active record buyers, paying their $9.99 or €9.99 or £9.99 a month. My feeling would be to get around the situation with someone like Taylor Swift – but Spotify won’t do it – is a window between making something available on the premium service, earlier than it’s made available on the free service.”

Dickins has first-hand experience of this policy, with reports in 2012 that Spotify refused to allow Adele’s last album 21 to be made available in this way. The album was added to the service later that year.

Even so, he was positive about the prospects for streaming overall, and Spotify in particular. “It’s all about scale. Spotify will work if they get enough payers.”

Dickins, who also manages artists and producers including London Grammar, Jamie T, Rick Rubin and Paul Epworth, was speaking as part of a panel of managers alongside Jeff Jampol, who manages The Doors and The Ramones, along with the estates of other artists.

Jonathan Dickins and Jeff Jampol at Web Summit. Photograph: Stuart Dredge/The Guardian
Jampol talked about the changing nature of the music industry, suggesting that record labels are no longer at the centre of an artist’s business.


Advertisement



“Here’s the way an income pie should look for a successful or current artist: 60-65% of their income is going to come from tickets, 15-25% from tour merch, 10-15% from publishing, 2-4% from ancillary and 2-4% from record sales,” said Jampol.

Dickins agreed that touring is becoming hugely important to most artists. “Adele is the exception not the rule. The record 21 came out in 2011, we’ve sold 30 million copies of that album,” he said. “We haven’t toured that much, for many different reasons. But I think touring has become a major focus point for 99.9% of current artists’ careers.”

Jampol talked about the importance for managers of being able to handle many different business areas, from books and merchandise to publishing income and even museum partnerships – he’s worked on several for his artists.

“The record business is a key but small part of it. A book publisher knows nothing about the record business, who knows nothing about the apparel business, who knows nothing about museums, who knows nothing about publishing,” he said.


“We’re in the middle. We’re the quarterback, and the artist is the CEO... We have to get all these players to work together.”

Dickins talked about the importance of turning down opportunities, rather than trying to do everything. “The one thing the internet has done: content is everywhere.... and part of the hunger for content is we’ve reached saturation point. and when you reach saturation point it cheapens it. And one of the things I do is say no,” he said.

“That might be ‘no, I don’t want to do an Adele perfume, we’re not doing a nail polish’. Or ‘that ticket price is too expensive’. Whatever it is, the power of saying no, and being the gatekeeper to these opportunities is key.”

He said that major labels nowadays “live under a culture of fear... people live with these two-three year deals, whatever they’ve got, they’ve got kids at school, and they have to produce hits. And if they have a hit - which are few and far between – there’s the opportunity to kill: to rinse every last bit of blood out of a record. And I think it’s dangerous.”

Jampol agreed: “Labels are all about getting their profit and loss for the third or fourth quarter. We’re about the long-term vision. We plan in decades!” he said.

“Having an artist legacy is kinda like walking up a down escalator. If you’re standing still, you’re not standing still, you’re moving backwards. You have to find that sweet spot that’s not doing nothing and not doing too much. And over-saturation is a big problem.”


Meanwhile, Dickins said that managers are getting to grips with the biggest change in the music industry, which is its transition from sales to streaming.

“The business was always about buying stuff. When it was cassettes and vinyl, then it became about CD, then the disasters like DCC [digital compact cassette] and mini-disc,” he said.

“Streaming will be ubiquitous in five years. We are going now into a streaming model. Whether you want to be in it or not, within five years it will be everywhere. That something does not become about buying any more. It becomes about consumption and it becomes about access... and that hasn’t been done before.”


http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/nov/06/adele-manager-jonathan-dickens-streaming-spotify
 
Streaming entities are going to replace record labels.​
 ​
Artists are going to sign to companies like Beats Music, Spotify, Pandora, Soundcloud.​
 ​
Streaming is going to have a monthly fee like Cable and Internet, maybe they'll even team up with companies like Comcast and Time Warner to have Internet/Cable/Streaming bundles.​
 ​
Artists will sign to streaming companies, either with multiple album deals, or to release single albums (for the one hit wonders).​
 ​
Streaming will be a monthly fee and the free versions of the apps will be a radio type thing where you have ot listen to a playlist of all the artists signed to that streaming service. Maybe you'll be able to listen to all of the artists singles for free, but it will cost money to play albums.​
 ​
Expect an artist to sign to a streaming company to exclusively release their music by 2020. The first few artists to sign will be the BIG artists. Beyonce, Adele, Taylor Swift, Drake, etc. It's kinda already happening with Taylor Swift taking her music off of Spotify and now is in talks with Beats Music. When Drake's current Cash Money deal runs out, he will probably sign with a streaming company. Maybe rappers will start signing their vanity labels to streaming entities. Kanye might do it with a new DONDA Music Label. Although knowing rap, they won't catch up until this is the standard in every other form of popular music.​
 ​
Labels will start going extra hard taking music from sites like YouTube and Soundcloud.
 ​
Quote me at the beginning of the 2020's.
 ​
BrRl8krCQAIspN8.jpg
 ​
 
Last edited:
^meek that is already happening...especially on the soundcloud front...dont ask me why and how tho :nerd:
 
SoundCloud has erased my need to download music, but I've noticed them start to take music off there now.
 
lol, the idea of the streaming services acting as labels is basically what this article is about
 
i notice alot of artists now got Soundcloud accounts and release music alot more often over there, looks like they getting paid off of the amount of plays they attain so streaming is the way to go i guess.
 
Last edited:
Random thought: I can never stream as my default music listening method. I will forever download. I'm not finna be on the internet on my phone all day because I'm listening to music. Bill would be sky high. And when I'm on a plane then what? what about the train? Naaah bruh keep them streams, man. I can't even swim.
 
Random thought: I can never stream as my default music listening method. I will forever download. I'm not finna be on the internet on my phone all day because I'm listening to music. Bill would be sky high. And when I'm on a plane then what? what about the train? Naaah bruh keep them streams, man. I can't even swim.

when you upgrade to premium, most streaming companies let you do offline streaming

Or At least thats what beats and spotify did when i was doing the free trials :lol:

And it seemingly took up less memory than if i were to download

Beats Music is dope as hell btw wish i could pay that 10 a month

Or someone could look out with a permanent free trial finesse [emoji]128064[/emoji]​
 
Back
Top Bottom