George Zimmerman arrested for aggravated assault

 
What?..........this case was about race, it had nothing to do with justice on either end.
It was only about race because the media spun it that way, just like the Mike Brown case was spun to be about race.

Were these race claims substantiated with evidence? (past racism issues, KKK ties, etc) 

No, because being white is enough 'evidence' for the black community to claim racism. 
 
 

What?..........this case was about race, it had nothing to do with justice on either end.


It was only about race because the media spun it that way, just like the Mike Brown case was spun to be about race.

Were these race claims substantiated with evidence? (past racism issues, KKK ties, etc) 

No, because being white is enough 'evidence' for the black community to claim racism. 

Kinda like how being black is enough........ Eh never mind :lol:
 
Actually, I worded it wrong in one post.

That was the basis of your entire deflection? lol.
Now that we've got that out of the way, what's your opinion on what the verdict should have been?

Ah the backpedal right on cue :lol:

I believe the jury made the right verdict, but I don't think Zimmerman is innocent.



By the way, what's your take on Rachel Jeantel admitting TM called GZ a "creepy *** cracker?"

Was Trayvon Martin racist? 
My take is, that was a racist comment.
 
Last edited:
I haven't been keeping up.

Have the usual suspects defended their boy Zimmerman or are they cowering pretending they dont see the thread?
 
Now if you go back and analyze what was posted, you can see that the basis of it was to prove why the right verdict was delivered.

Nothing more. No emotional, laughing-emoticon-filled, insecure posts. Simply what was involved in the case, why he was found not-guilty and why this verdict is justified.

He was found not guilty because of reasonable doubt.

Reasonable doubt does not imply innocence.

That's all people are saying that George Zimmerman is not innocent

Why is that so hard to grasp?
 
I believe Zimmerman instigated the situation (operator told him not to approach trayvon/suspect) ...got his *** whooped...and was able to use his gun cause of that goofy *** law.

Personally feel like if the tables were turned and trayvon approached Zimmerman after being told not to he would be sitting in a prison rotting. It's all speculation and me factoring in privilege certain demographics are able to exercise

Just unfortunate cause if I was being followed and stalked by someone I would defend myself too...every human has that right but Zimmerman had his ****** *** father who was a former judge to pull strings for him
 
I believe Zimmerman instigated the situation (operator told him not to approach trayvon/suspect) ...got his *** whooped...and was able to use his gun cause of that goofy *** law.

Personally feel like if the tables were turned and trayvon approached Zimmerman after being told not to he would be sitting in a prison rotting. It's all speculation and me factoring in privilege certain demographics are able to exercise

Just unfortunate cause if I was being followed and stalked by someone I would defend myself too...every human has that right but Zimmerman had his ****** *** father who was a former judge to pull strings for him
The dispatcher had no legal authority to tell Zimmerman what to do and even if Zimmerman continued following Martin, it wasn't a crime.

Trayvon approached and attacked Zimmerman, and his story was consistent with the evidence. 

That last claim about his father is pure tin foil hat conspiracy speculation at its finest. 


pimp.gif
 
Last edited:
Apparently it's hard for you to grasp.

The verdict is what caused racial tension, just like MB/EG's verdict. Not because they may "think" he's not innocent.

Everyone arguing with you is simply supporting why he was found not-guilty. Nothing more, nothing less.
I disagree though. The racial tension came way before a verdict. It came when they decided not to indict George Zimmerman. It wasn't until it made national news that they arrested him.
 
If you're just giving your opinion you should lead the sentence with "I believe", "I think", "I feel", etc.
Well we both know it's an opinion clearly, but yes that is what I believe. I also believe that Trayvon made it home only to go back and confront Zimmerman. 
 
 
Apparently it's hard for you to grasp.


The verdict is what caused racial tension, just like MB/EG's verdict. Not because they may "think" he's not innocent.


Everyone arguing with you is simply supporting why he was found not-guilty. Nothing more, nothing less.
I disagree though. The racial tension came way before a verdict. It came when they decided not to indict George Zimmerman. It wasn't until it made national news that they arrested him.


They charged him with 2nd-degree murder.

Almost a month after the incident. The racial tension began with the district attorney initially saying he would not try the case.
 
Last edited:
Almost a month after the incident. The racial tension began with the district attorney initially saying he would not try the case.
The racial tension started day ONE when the media labeled the story as, "white man kills unarmed black teen."

They couldn't have possibly said, "man kills unarmed teen," because if you don't add race in there, it won't blow up. 
 
Last edited:
I know the dispatcher doesnt have legal authority but I know if the tables were turned trayvon would be sitting in a cell.

Can I prove it? Of course not but I tend to side with history
 
I get what you're saying.

What I'm saying is they still charged him with second-degree murder. Had he not been charged with so, maybe the outcome would have been different.

Different in terms of what? Racial tension?

Almost a month after the incident. The racial tension began with the district attorney initially saying he would not try the case.


The racial tension started day ONE when the media labeled the story as, "white man kills unarmed black teen."

They couldn't have possible said, "man kills unarmed teen," because if you don't add race in their, it won't blow up. 
I agree, especially because he wasn't even white. Just another minority thinking he's better than another minority.
 
Last edited:
He was found not guilty because of reasonable doubt.

Reasonable doubt does not imply innocence.

That's all people are saying that George Zimmerman is not innocent

Why is that so hard to grasp?


I believe Zimmerman instigated the situation (operator told him not to approach trayvon/suspect) ...got his *** whooped...and was able to use his gun cause of that goofy *** law.

Personally feel like if the tables were turned and trayvon approached Zimmerman after being told not to he would be sitting in a prison rotting. It's all speculation and me factoring in privilege certain demographics are able to exercise

Just unfortunate cause if I was being followed and stalked by someone I would defend myself too...every human has that right but Zimmerman had his ****** *** father who was a former judge to pull strings for him
 
I mean this is clearly a case of a very responsible good hearted man who always does the right thing being railroaded by a corrupt justice system and the crazy, dangerous, skittle-loving people that he is constantly surrounded by.

He is definitely just a victim of circumstance. I don't see why people can't just let him be, and or give him a badge and a gun so he can look more officer-like.

/sarcasm off 
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom