Belgium
formerly colombia
- 25,973
- 37,263
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
I wouldn't trust an overly religious loony like Cruz in the oval office. Would be just as terrible as Trump tbh.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Equal effort not equaling equal results is unjust.
This is da whole ethos where ya get it wrong.
Try this logic baggin women.. Try this logic at shooting hoops, how about school?
Fams, trying to socially re-engineer every aspect of life cuz people get left behind is beyond impractical to me.
They trying to do away with da single entrance test @ Stuyvesant HIGH SCHOOL because not enuff black & hispanic kids get in, meanwhile that place is crawling with asians, even outnumbering whites, so when i hear "da test
Is racially discriminatory" i feel its intellectually dishonest.
U can legislate equal opportunity, but you cant legislate equal results..
Wow. I dunno who wrote that but think about that statement and how ridiculous it is, lol.Equal effort not equaling equal results is unjust.
Wow. I dunno who wrote that but think about that statement and how ridiculous it is, lol.
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that." - Derek Jeter quotesEnlighten me on why it's ridiculous?Wow. I dunno who wrote that but think about that statement and how ridiculous it is, lol.
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that." - Derek Jeter quotes
You'll see... its all prophecy
Quote:
How so?
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that." - Derek Jeter quotes
Not to mention comparing a high school admission exam to shooting hoops and bagging women. That logic is not necessary with male/female relations and pickup basketball games. These admissions exams have HUGE implications on the lives of these students, and to not acknowledge the fact that some groups start in pole position and others are already behind when the race begins is intellectually dishonest.
That's such a simple way to look at things. The situation is 100 times more complex than you make it out to be.Asians got language barriers and come dirt poor da same way alot of my Hispanic contemporaries do..why would i pull a race card when they flourishing and we're borh minorities?Not to mention comparing a high school admission exam to shooting hoops and bagging women. That logic is not necessary with male/female relations and pickup basketball games. These admissions exams have HUGE implications on the lives of these students, and to not acknowledge the fact that some groups start in pole position and others are already behind when the race begins is intellectually dishonest.
Equal effort not equaling equal results is unjust.
This is da whole ethos where ya get it wrong.
Try this logic baggin women.. Try this logic at shooting hoops, how about school?
Fams, trying to socially re-engineer every aspect of life cuz people get left behind is beyond impractical to me.
They trying to do away with da single entrance test @ Stuyvesant HIGH SCHOOL because not enuff black & hispanic kids get in, meanwhile that place is crawling with asians, even outnumbering whites, so when i hear "da test
Is racially discriminatory" i feel its intellectually dishonest.
U can legislate equal opportunity, but you cant legislate equal results..
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that." - Derek Jeter quotes
Since we are applying baseball to political economy, let me extend the metaphor a bit. Suppose every Major League team started every game with runs equal to its franchise total of World Series wins. So the Yankees could start every game with 27 runs and the Colorado Rockies start with no runs. Even a mediocre and bloated Yankees roster would win most years and the following year they would start every game with more runs.
That would sound unfair to some (like us crazy leftists on here) but there would be some who would say that certain teams just have to work harder. Wannabe social scientists in the Conservative press would say that wearing pin stripes is the key to success and that being given 27 or more runs every game is irrelevant. Some would call critics of the new rule "beta males" who need to just get their "grind on and spend more time in da battin' cage." Some folks would say that 1927 was so long ago that even though the Yankees get spotted a run a every game because of that '27 victory, that poorer teams should just "get over it."
Losing teams would be second guessed and derided as morally weak and inferior. Finally, we would have centrists who would suggest that every title poor team, in the interest for fairness be spotted two home runs and then after a heated debate with Republicans, the guaranteed run act of 2016 would grant teams with no World Series titles a half of a run but only for five years and they have to submit to much more stringent drug testing. Ya know, because they're lazy.
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that." - Derek Jeter quotes
Since we are applying baseball to political economy, let me extend the metaphor a bit. Suppose every Major League team started every game with runs equal to its franchise total of World Series wins. So the Yankees could start every game with 27 runs and the Colorado Rockies start with no runs. Even a mediocre and bloated Yankees roster would win most years and the following year they would start every game with more runs.
That would sound unfair to some (like us crazy leftists on here) but there would be some who would say that certain teams just have to work harder. Wannabe social scientists in the Conservative press would say that wearing pin stripes is the key to success and that being given 27 or more runs every game is irrelevant. Some would call critics of the new rule "beta males" who need to just get their "grind on and spend more time in da battin' cage." Some folks would say that 1927 was so long ago that even though the Yankees get spotted a run a every game because of that '27 victory, that poorer teams should just "get over it."
Losing teams would be second guessed and derided as morally weak and inferior. Finally, we would have centrists who would suggest that every title poor team, in the interest for fairness be spotted two home runs and then after a heated debate with Republicans, the guaranteed run act of 2016 would grant teams with no World Series titles a half of a run but only for five years and they have to submit to much more stringent drug testing. Ya know, because they're lazy.
And yet da royals spanked da mets w/ ½ da salary...
"Hard work beat talent if talent dont work hard" -Jadakiss
His analogy went completely over your headAnd yet da royals spanked da mets w/ ½ da salary...There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that." - Derek Jeter quotes
Since we are applying baseball to political economy, let me extend the metaphor a bit. Suppose every Major League team started every game with runs equal to its franchise total of World Series wins. So the Yankees could start every game with 27 runs and the Colorado Rockies start with no runs. Even a mediocre and bloated Yankees roster would win most years and the following year they would start every game with more runs.
That would sound unfair to some (like us crazy leftists on here) but there would be some who would say that certain teams just have to work harder. Wannabe social scientists in the Conservative press would say that wearing pin stripes is the key to success and that being given 27 or more runs every game is irrelevant. Some would call critics of the new rule "beta males" who need to just get their "grind on and spend more time in da battin' cage." Some folks would say that 1927 was so long ago that even though the Yankees get spotted a run a every game because of that '27 victory, that poorer teams should just "get over it."
Losing teams would be second guessed and derided as morally weak and inferior. Finally, we would have centrists who would suggest that every title poor team, in the interest for fairness be spotted two home runs and then after a heated debate with Republicans, the guaranteed run act of 2016 would grant teams with no World Series titles a half of a run but only for five years and they have to submit to much more stringent drug testing. Ya know, because they're lazy.
"Hard work beat talent if talent dont work hard" -Jadakiss
There may be people who have more talent than you, but there's no excuse for anyone to work harder than you do - and I believe that." - Derek Jeter quotes
Since we are applying baseball to political economy, let me extend the metaphor a bit. Suppose every Major League team started every game with runs equal to its franchise total of World Series wins. So the Yankees could start every game with 27 runs and the Colorado Rockies start with no runs. Even a mediocre and bloated Yankees roster would win most years and the following year they would start every game with more runs.
That would sound unfair to some (like us crazy leftists on here) but there would be some who would say that certain teams just have to work harder. Wannabe social scientists in the Conservative press would say that wearing pin stripes is the key to success and that being given 27 or more runs every game is irrelevant. Some would call critics of the new rule "beta males" who need to just get their "grind on and spend more time in da battin' cage." Some folks would say that 1927 was so long ago that even though the Yankees get spotted a run a every game because of that '27 victory, that poorer teams should just "get over it."
Losing teams would be second guessed and derided as morally weak and inferior. Finally, we would have centrists who would suggest that every title poor team, in the interest for fairness be spotted two home runs and then after a heated debate with Republicans, the guaranteed run act of 2016 would grant teams with no World Series titles a half of a run but only for five years and they have to submit to much more stringent drug testing. Ya know, because they're lazy.
And yet da royals spanked da mets w/ ½ da salary...
"Hard work beat talent if talent dont work hard" -Jadakiss
His analogy went completely over your head
No actually it didn't.His analogy went completely over your headAnd yet da royals spanked da mets w/ ½ da salary...
"Hard work beat talent if talent dont work hard" -Jadakiss
Trump is like playing Russian roulette. Cruz is taking a loaded 12-gauge, pointing it at your legs, and pulling the trigger. Dude looks like a burnt noodle too.Cruz simply is not presidential, he's also not very likeable. Trump really didn't need Wisconsin. He can easily get the 1,237 still.
What's your counter argument since you disagree?No actually it didn't.His analogy went completely over your headAnd yet da royals spanked da mets w/ ½ da salary...
"Hard work beat talent if talent dont work hard" -Jadakiss
And I guess that Rex guy is saying that Jeter quote only applies to baseball, k ill cut you some slack, only to sports right?
[thread="629164"]Quote:[/thread]
That's such a simple way to look at things. The situation is 100 times more complex than you make it out to be.
Not to mention comparing a high school admission exam to shooting hoops and bagging women. That logic is not necessary with male/female relations and pickup basketball games. These admissions exams have HUGE implications on the lives of these students, and to not acknowledge the fact that some groups start in pole position and others are already behind when the race begins is intellectually dishonest.
Asians got language barriers and come dirt poor da same way alot of my Hispanic contemporaries do..why would i pull a race card when they flourishing and we're borh minorities?
I would go on and on about the difference between growing up discriminated against in this country, and coming over with an education and a clean slate, but why should I? It's obvious that groups perform differently. If the problem isn't the system, are we to believe that some groups are just genetically more prone to be successful? Or is it that certain groups 'focus on education' as was alluded to earlier in this thread.
Any other explanation you have comes off as ignorant and simplistic to me. I'm willing to be proven wrong, though. Explain to me what it is that generally makes Asians achieve more than Blacks and Hispanics in this country?
It's because they think it's 1925 and people are chasing the murican dreem. I find it funny when people go with "follow the Chinese, Irish and Italians" and realize that they suffered quite as hard.this this this
People who fall for the model minority myth still surprises me.
[thread="629164"]Quote:[/thread]
That's such a simple way to look at things. The situation is 100 times more complex than you make it out to be.
Not to mention comparing a high school admission exam to shooting hoops and bagging women. That logic is not necessary with male/female relations and pickup basketball games. These admissions exams have HUGE implications on the lives of these students, and to not acknowledge the fact that some groups start in pole position and others are already behind when the race begins is intellectually dishonest.
Asians got language barriers and come dirt poor da same way alot of my Hispanic contemporaries do..why would i pull a race card when they flourishing and we're borh minorities?
I would go on and on about the difference between growing up discriminated against in this country, and coming over with an education and a clean slate, but why should I? It's obvious that groups perform differently. If the problem isn't the system, are we to believe that some groups are just genetically more prone to be successful? Or is it that certain groups 'focus on education' as was alluded to earlier in this thread.
Any other explanation you have comes off as ignorant and simplistic to me. I'm willing to be proven wrong, though. Explain to me what it is that generally makes Asians achieve more than Blacks and Hispanics in this country?
this this this
People who fall for the model minority myth still surprises me.