- 664
- 150
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
I'd get the black / reds
The Air Jordan XVI returns in 2016
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by josh311,
- Start date
- 33
- 20
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2014
Do we have a release date yet? And are the black/red ones confirmed, or just the midnight blue?
- 1,799
- 488
- Joined
- May 12, 2015
This... ain't no way they flexxin like that... The tech is still 2000s but that price is horrible..
ELTORO84
formerly air23xxi
- 1,770
- 684
- Joined
- May 24, 2006
I'll still cop at $250 
- 24,441
- 22,108
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2015
Oh well, coppin regardless
Last edited:
- 5,853
- 1,513
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
Any jordan priced above the standard gr $190 is going to be somewhat limited
Not liking the 250 but for one of my faves i am in.
- 5,010
- 7,034
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2010
Lmfao! $250 for the 16's..SMDH lmfaoooo. That's too much. That's a $90 price jump
bigj505
Staff member
- 42,582
- 21,768
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2007
250 is a hard pill to swallow but i cant 100% say im not gonna pay it
- 14,542
- 19,189
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
Probably gonna pass, 250 is odee. But I'll probably pay 250 when the bred 16s drop next year.
- 339
- 358
- Joined
- May 27, 2015
People might as well get used to the 250 thing,its here to stay
- 840
- 408
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2016
So happy I only like the 1 through 13's...
- 339
- 358
- Joined
- May 27, 2015
that's party why everything after 14 will be 250
- 339
- 358
- Joined
- May 27, 2015
Partly
- 3,969
- 535
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2001
250....practically a price increase of 90 bucks. 125 to 190 is already tough with most retros (AJ3-10)
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 63,018
- 189,186
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
Last edited:
- 1,287
- 85
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2005
250 is a hard pill to swallow but i cant 100% say im not gonna pay it
same feels here
- 1,799
- 488
- Joined
- May 12, 2015
Man all this [emoji]128169[/emoji] dropping this year... Half of the releases are 220/250.. Damn! I need a drank.
- 12,874
- 11,064
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2014
Haven't Foams been $250 for a few years now? Still too much for 16s IMO but this price-point isn't new.
- 1,211
- 813
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2015
Might have to bite the bullet on these
- 5,010
- 7,034
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2010
Yeah, true. It's not the $250 price point, but it's just that I thought the 16's were going to be in the $190-$200 bracket, not $250. Jordan 16's at $250?? Just think about that for a moment LOL.
Last edited:
- 60,034
- 50,944
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2004
16s is one of my favorite Jays. Had the ginger and the Cherrywoods. Had the black that came back with the CDP. Wanted the Navy but never got them. $250 is too much, I'm out. Doubt these sit long enough to go on sale.
- 5,039
- 1,215
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2014
So because they are less popular charging more for them will make them sell better?
Logic seems flawed.
- 9,189
- 1,132
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
I like midnight navy 16's. Just not enough to pay that ridiculous price.
- 4,312
- 10,476
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2007
I'll still be coping every single 16 @ $250. My 2nd favorite jays.
Last edited:
- 4,445
- 4,165
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2005
Nike/JB is buggin with that $250 MSRP tag. RIP
Man times have really changed..
Man times have really changed..
Last edited:
