FL Homeowner Shoots, Kills Teen Burglary Suspect. Now His Family Is Mad

Y'all rationalizing with the robber just need to admit that getting shot is a potential outcome when you break into houses.
 
Hand2HandKing said:
cuz we live in the wild west now
Click to expand...
I don't know what America you been living in but yeah it's always been like that.

Maybe it's a state by state thing. I know if I broke in to a house in Fl, Tx, Az, etc. I'll probably get shot if anyone is home.

That's how it is. All these guns these gun owners got is there for a reason and it aint for show.
 
so where is the line drawn?

can we kill someone for looking at us funny and making us feel threatened?

what about slander, can i kill someone for the damage they may do my reputation?

i mean its all so psychological harm akin to getting your house broken into

whos to say one is more harmful than another?
 
laugh.gif
 at comparing someone breaking into your house and stealing from you to a guy giving you a mean look 
roll.gif


causing property damage and stealing your valuables is not "psychological harm"
 
Hand2HandKing said:
but the rationale in here was that the devastation of home invasion justifies murder
Click to expand...

No, the rationale is that when you're a criminal, you inherit what comes with that territory especially in a state that protects people shooting intruders.
 
no that wasnt the rationale because burglary isnt a capital crime

if the state cant execute for it, neither should individual citizens
 
Hand2HandKing said:
no that wasnt the rationale because burglary isnt a capital crime

if the state cant execute for it, neither should individual citizens
Click to expand...

Alright dude. You're clearly trolling. Everybody here keeps saying the same thing and you blatantly ignore it.
 
Some of you dudes need to understand law. Forget if it's irrational, murder, frowned upon or flat out wrong. In FLA if you forcefully enter someone's private property unannounced you are risking your life. Plain and simple. In the eyes of the law, you are completely justified under the castle doctrine to use deadly force and are granted immunity under these circumstances no questions asked
 
Last edited:
CL-1B said:
Some of you dudes need to understand law. Forget if it's irrational, justified, frowned upon or flat out wrong. In FLA if you forcefully enter someone's private property unannounced you are risking your life. Plain and simple. In the eyes of the law, you are completely justified under the castle doctrine to use deadly force and are granted immunity under these circumstances no questions asked
Click to expand...

Hand king just wants to ignore everything and pass his opinion off as fact. He's a troll.
 
Hand2HandKing said:
no that wasnt the rationale because burglary isnt a capital crime

if the state cant execute for it, neither should individual citizens
Click to expand...

You might do better in France or something. We strapped to the **** around these parts.
 
Hand2HandKing said:
the rationale really "round these here parts" is that criminals arent humans or dont have rights
Click to expand...

They knew of the consequences before hand. Anyone from FL will tell you the art of thievery is a lost cause out here because of these types of laws.
 
Hand2HandKing said:
the rationale really "round these here parts" is that criminals arent humans or dont have rights
Click to expand...
When you commit a crime or commit to being a criminal you forefit a lot of rights and you risk your life in doing so.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

The ultimate sneaker enthusiast community.

NikeTalk was created as a way of giving back to both the sneaker enthusiast community and to the greater global community of which we are all a part.

NikeTalk is NOT affiliated with Nike Inc. in any way, shape, or form. All opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Nike, Inc.

© 1999-2024 NikeTalk.com

Share this page

Back
Top Bottom