- 1
- 11
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2016
- 20
- 41
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2016
out
Last edited:
- 12,581
- 27,216
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
Looks wide 
- 315
- 360
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2012
Like it
- 44,181
- 73,191
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2004
These >>>> 2
titanium tea
Banned
- 1,663
- 940
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2016
i like how they kept up with the traction.
Usually nike likes moving away from what works in order to change the style.
Thats how an air jordan 20 ends up with worse traction than a jordan 1.
Usually nike likes moving away from what works in order to change the style.
Thats how an air jordan 20 ends up with worse traction than a jordan 1.
- 9,375
- 9,542
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
There better be some zoom in that forefoot.
- 33,349
- 15,147
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2009
I don't know how anyone plays in the Kyrie 2's. I cannot play in a shoe that has zero cushioning and is stiff as a board like that.
- 143
- 40
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
Looks like zoom
- 350
- 246
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2015
I agree they look wide but so does the two on the bottom. Just goes with the rounded outsole. I hope its very similar to the two with what looks like heel and forefoot zoom. Probably a price increase too. Nike is lowering prices tho so who knows
Last edited:
- 12,581
- 27,216
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
If they keep it the same price and add forefoot zoom, thatd be sick
Million dollar question for me is strap or not?
- 43,535
- 27,833
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
Great heel to toe transition and traction were outstanding, glad they didn't shy away from it. I didn't have a problem with the forefoot cushioning on the 2, it was adequate for my playing style. No complaint if the 3s are plusher.
- 220
- 548
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
deleted
Last edited:
5
56250
Guest
I actually really like playing in them. Due to the width of the sole, which looks like twice wider than the 2s, and the responsiveness, it actually does give you a bit of cushioning, which for me is just fine. I am not the big walking on 100% air guy.
- 7,345
- 4,404
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2009
If they keep it the same price and add forefoot zoom, thatd be sick
Million dollar question for me is strap or not?
According to sneakerfiles the price will remain the same as the 2's. $120
If that leak kb24 posted turns out to be the real deal, thats one ugly shoe mane
Last edited:
- 12,581
- 27,216
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
those low quality leaked pics always make the shoes look ugly. And sometimes they just are that ugly other times not so much
- 43,535
- 27,833
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
Looks like an Under Armour shoe with a Swoosh No strap is a good sign
No strap is a good sign
- 661
- 362
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2013
The upper and towards the back reminds me of the Lebron 6.
- 9,375
- 9,542
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
We need better pictures. 
- 4,159
- 3,945
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2013
I see potential. I'm ready.
- 364
- 283
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2012
That big swoosh on the side is disappointing and a let down if they go in that direction.
- 12,581
- 27,216
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
Kinda reminds me of a kd trey5 reject
marinernw
Banned
- 29
- 16
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2016
What happened to the pic? Can someone DM it to me..
- 43,535
- 27,833
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2002
Nike didn't take kindly of the leak
- 6,206
- 5,868
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2007
poof !
i looked a couple times b 4 it came down.............. was it a seperate tongue or 1 piece bootie set up ? looked 1 piece to me i couldnt tell. least there was no strap
i looked a couple times b 4 it came down.............. was it a seperate tongue or 1 piece bootie set up ? looked 1 piece to me i couldnt tell. least there was no strap
