- 827
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2009
they look like a well put together shoe and great for basketball but way over priced imo.
2009 live in the Flesh(Pix)
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by haystack510,
- Start date
- 1,050
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2007
I'll wait till this shoe hits the sales racks..Thanks for sharing man...
- 453
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2008
To anybody who has these can you give us an idea of how the heel feels when you are wearing them?? Just by looking at the shoe it seems that the heel of thefoot would be elevated in contrast to the ball of the foot???? Thanks in advance.
- 11,534
- 321
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2006
Same here ... That glass like marble midsole is the thing that is pulling me in .... I cant wait to see more colorways ...
- 1,668
- 822
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2008
thanks for the pics. still not feeling them. why is it when i see these shoes i think of the platform boots that the pimp wore from "i'm gonna get yousucka"?
- 296
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
i think these pics make them look worse... sad...
- 1,295
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
My eyes they burn!!! (not in a good way either)
- 1,826
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2006
same thing for me...
i am thinking about the white ones
hollakid619
Banned
- 2,390
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2003
Everytime they start to look good, I blink then its right back to ugly.
- 3,095
- 42
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2008
great message on the box, i've always said that i'd cop those if the price is right, i'm kinda broke right now so i won't be able to get them
ricekrispies420
formerly l2icel3oi9i6
- 3,843
- 42
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2008
nehhhh.
- 895
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
Never at $190. Maybe $150. Still imo in the bottom five sig. line Jordan's of all time.
- 134
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2007
The shoe is alright....that price is too much though.
- 515
- 10
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
stilll dont like them
- 1,796
- 210
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
I actually saw these in person last night. The quality is very nice but I cant seem to fall for the styling. The price tag is the real turn off.
- 991
- 12
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2000
Thanks for the pics. I hated the shoe at first. Looks better now. For $190 NO!!! Btw is there going to be any issues with these like pinky toe XX3's?
solewoman
Staff member
- 19,419
- 20,855
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2006
i like the box.
- 1,492
- 67
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2009
did some of u guys even read the tech info on the shoe?, part of the reason why it cost so much
- 2,724
- 210
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2007
No thanks still not feelin em
If JB thinks this will change things, it will not.
If JB thinks this will change things, it will not.
- 23
- 10
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2008
btw, in the flesh refers to it living, so just call it PICS or something instead of some creative title that doesn't pertain to the shoes.
- 4,702
- 2,599
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
To anyone who owns this shoe is the fit worth the price because the styling definitely isn't. We all know that J's are supposed to be the pinnaclebasketball shoe as does it live up to that. It looks like it could be a great ballin' shoe but not at 190. I'm interested to hear some performancereviews myself because if it's not up to par then there's really nothing that would make me buy this shoe.
- 2,202
- 35
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
Too much money. they arent bad, but neither are Melo's. The box and what it says wont sell me this time. They are ok but $200 aint happening
- 1,882
- 10
- Joined
- May 21, 2008
i'm not gonna lie i'd cop....the box.
- 2,202
- 35
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
Dude I dont care what it says they maybe paid $20 with material to make these shoes. They werent handcrafted like the XX# so the excuse they areso pricey due to material is BS
- 279
- 10
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2008
i agree with the assassin. im a detail man as well and i did read the tech info on this shoe but it doesn't excuse the and 1 lookalike quality. originalityis no where to be found on this kick. im sure jb is proud of the technology incorporated into this performance based shoe but 190 won't cut it bro!