- 60
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
2011 J11 concords legit check pls...
- Thread in 'Archive: Jordan Brand Price/Fake Checks' Thread starter Started by rastaboy,
- Start date
- 60
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- 983
- 1,088
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2003
These look legit to me, need a straight shot for the 23's to be certain.
- 3,469
- 855
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
agreed
- 8,274
- 2,165
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2001
100% authentic Air Jordan 11 Concord 2011
- 5,692
- 1,762
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2014
100% legit '11 Retro Concord 11's.
- 60
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
View media item 1315946
back shot..
back shot..
- 60
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
worried bout d production date.. some say junes are early releases. any comments??
- 21
- 11
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2012
They look legit to me.
- yellowing around pods looks correct
- jumpman is in the right position
- the peak on the sole on the back looks good
- patent leather looks to be the right height
Not sure about the production date, I sold mine a while back.
- yellowing around pods looks correct
- jumpman is in the right position
- the peak on the sole on the back looks good
- patent leather looks to be the right height
Not sure about the production date, I sold mine a while back.
- 60
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
anyone.. bout d production dates.
- 10,288
- 3,826
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
production dates vary. People that talk this BS usually have no clue about fakes vs legit. Production dates and UPCs have matched for years now..The shoes will have the tells..This pair looks good to me.
- 1,468
- 4,999
- Joined
- May 13, 2013
100% legit '11 concord 11's..
- 8,274
- 2,165
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2001
production dates vary. i have authentic pairs that have 1 month production periods. those are usually from europe retailers. definitely have to go by the details on the shoes
- 60
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- 60
- 13
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
View media item 1423448
deez worries me.. no stamps...[emoji]128533[/emoji]
deez worries me.. no stamps...[emoji]128533[/emoji]
- 305
- 137
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
never mind
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
I don't know fella's these look fake to me, the jump man, the ball is touching the 23, and the 23 looks stretch, the soles doesn't have the look of the yellowing like it should
- 305
- 137
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
Ball touching 23 cuz its worn, of course the stretched 23. The sole yellowing like this cuz nike changed the colorway of the sole on the 11 retro 2011 "concord". It will start yellowing from the junction of transparent sole and the blue area.
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
View media item 1423610Are u saying mine will start to touch after I wear?
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
View media item 1423623My pair is ds, and his are worn,
- 305
- 137
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
The quality varies and the ankle varies.
This is my pair.
I think Jordan may touch his 23 after being worn by me.
This is my pair.
I think Jordan may touch his 23 after being worn by me.
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
Ur joking right? I think we might need timmybrixxx to look at this again
- 305
- 137
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
Am not joking, the best way to check 11s is to look at the back of the insole and the midsole. I think we may need a shot on the box, to see the stamp on it. Timmy already left a comment on this.
Peace.
Peace.
- 2,060
- 515
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2015
How would a stitch jump man move to the 23? Sure I can see a used pair might crease or fold by where the ball almost touches the 23, only the person with the shoes can look and tell us where the ball is really located
- 10,288
- 3,826
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2013
That's just a factory flaw fellas..Not a tell for Fake vs real. I've seen many legit pair with the jumpman all over the place.
Similar threads
