- 782
- 551
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2017
Not if they're limited.How you taxing $500 for a pack where both shoes would otherwise, if sold separately, would retail for $190?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Not if they're limited.How you taxing $500 for a pack where both shoes would otherwise, if sold separately, would retail for $190?
What does that have to do with it?Not if they're limited.How you taxing $500 for a pack where both shoes would otherwise, if sold separately, would retail for $190?
How you taxing $500 for a pack where both shoes would otherwise, if sold separately, would retail for $190?
How you taxing $500 for a pack where both shoes would otherwise, if sold separately, would retail for $190?
But they wouldn't be $190. They would be $250 like the C&C
6,7, and 8's. Plus you get a fancy box with a Phil Jackson play on it. -->(Allegedly) Ha!
Are y'all forgetting the GOF and the Shooting Stars Packs? Where Nike pretty much sold "us" 1 shoe for $500? Nike put those out like...
Nah, but those chutney 13's might soon beIs this your shoes ?
That's the first pic that has me even considering this pack. Looks kinda good to me there, but yeah, I still don't know if they look $500 good.
I would mark up "should've" too as a contraction on a paper as well. Should have is the proper phrase. But I ain't the grammar police so.....should've*
And nah.
That's the first pic that has me even considering this pack. Looks kinda good to me there, but yeah, I still don't know if they look $500 good.
Im a sucker for all 13s and love 14s, but couldn't agree more. I would drop the 380 immediately just to add to the collection. I'd never wear the 13, but that 14 looks really good to me.
Wonder if these have any chance of getting a 20% discount?
all of**
Smh what an idiot its olive guard in..