Early Releases are High Quality Fakes

Status
Not open for further replies.
i might post my SDS pair when i have time, has the same carbon fiber as my NDC pair and those were litterally the first pairs released on the market when concords came out.
 
Like I said, a lot of people ignore the truth because of the personal implications that come with it.
 
To help you out a lil bit, here's the one from the video:
341041


And here's mine:
341042

What's next, you're gonna start calling mine fake, too? :rofl:

Compelling video.....still not convinced these arent

Being made from da factory themselves unauthorized.....& for da record, im goin hard cuz im

Tired of da witch hunt, i dont have a actual dog in da

Fight, all my XI's is old school brick & mortar modells, HOH, champs sports store bought.
 
not calling them fake or real, thats why i buy from retailers. If i strike out then i aint getting them, cant trust anything or anyone these days. im not spending over retail to get a pair of Jordans that arent actually from NDC,FNL, etc etc
 
If
Compelling video.....still not convinced these arent

Being made from da factory themselves unauthorized.....& for da record, im goin hard cuz im

Tired of da witch hunt, i dont have a actual dog in da

Fight, all my XI's is old school brick & mortar modells, HOH, champs sports store bought.


If you believe they can't fake carbon fiber and they can't and don't use real carbon fiber then you are truly dumb. Everything is faked EVERYTHING. And using real carbonfinger In a fake shoe is a small price to pay for selling more units at a higher price. The cheaper fakes are usually sold for 100 bucks. This crap is being sold at or above retail. 5 dollars extra per shoe for 80 dollars more profit and quicker sales makes more sense. Ninjahoods argument is pure trash he figures the more he he talks nonsense that eventually he'll sound right but no one here is an idiot on that note I'm done ninjahoods exposed end of story
 
I'll be honest.... it doesn't matter to me at all whether the shoe is early or not. Call me simple but if its the same materials, shape, size tags etc. as the RD pairs, its legit enough for me. You guys are going too far in depth of whether a different factory makes it, if people are taking molds from the original factory, if the carbon fiber is a certain thickness(dude in here seriously said "Take it to a registered carbon fiber specialist and have him tell you if its legit :lol: "..... Really?), and yadda yadda yadda. Fact of the matter is none of you(including me) actually know where the early pairs come from or what the story is on them. I could rock a pair of 2013 Grapes that were bought from back in January on RD in May and NOT ONE PERSON will say a thing or be able to tell that its early.. and they're fake? Alright man.

Im not trying to stir anything up, thats just my 2 cents on it. If you actually do care and think early pairs are fakes, then more power to you. Obviously we all have different view on this subject
 
I'll be honest.... it doesn't matter to me at all whether the shoe is early or not. Call me simple but if its the same materials, shape, size tags etc. as the RD pairs, its legit enough for me. You guys are going too far in depth of whether a different factory makes it, if people are taking molds from the original factory, if the carbon fiber is a certain thickness(dude in here seriously said "Take it to a registered carbon fiber specialist and have him tell you if its legit :lol: "..... Really?), and yadda yadda yadda. Fact of the matter is none of you(including me) actually know where the early pairs come from or what the story is on them. I could rock a pair of 2013 Grapes that were bought from back in January on RD in May and NOT ONE PERSON will say a thing or be able to tell that its early.. and they're fake? Alright man.

Im not trying to stir anything up, thats just my 2 cents on it. If you actually do care and think early pairs are fakes, then more power to you. Obviously we all have different view on this subject

Shape and size tags are what often differ.

Example being bred 11s, most early pairs had a 1 or two week production date.

Early pairs of 5s are easily compared against a legit one due to the off netting.
 
I'll be honest.... it doesn't matter to me at all whether the shoe is early or not. Call me simple but if its the same materials, shape, size tags etc. as the RD pairs, its legit enough for me. You guys are going too far in depth of whether a different factory makes it, if people are taking molds from the original factory, if the carbon fiber is a certain thickness(dude in here seriously said "Take it to a registered carbon fiber specialist and have him tell you if its legit :lol: "..... Really?), and yadda yadda yadda. Fact of the matter is none of you(including me) actually know where the early pairs come from or what the story is on them. I could rock a pair of 2013 Grapes that were bought from back in January on RD in May and NOT ONE PERSON will say a thing or be able to tell that its early.. and they're fake? Alright man.

Im not trying to stir anything up, thats just my 2 cents on it. If you actually do care and think early pairs are fakes, then more power to you. Obviously we all have different view on this subject

Shape and size tags are what often differ.

Example being bred 11s, most early pairs had a 1 or two week production date.

Early pairs of 5s are easily compared against a legit one due to the off netting.


i forgot which shoe but i gota pair from NDC which had only a 3 week production date... others had confirmed the same


there goes that logic...
 
There goes that logic?

So a one week production is the same as a 3 week production now?

No, if the tag is different then the shoe is different. End of story.
 
There goes that logic?

So a one week production is the same as a 3 week production now?

No, if the tag is different then the shoe is different. End of story.

there have never been early release with one week productions :rofl:

they are always 3-4 weeks or longer.

post proof of this 1 week production.
 
Ninhahood
Sir Charles
Zyzz
Trethouseangt

Let it go brah's
Jesus

i did even say anything, im not defending them honestly because i could care less but some of you think you know 100% when you dont.

ive actually owned some so at least i can share opinions :lol:
 
they look good to me but then again just cuz

Certain people sell certain things draws a ire of concern...

Soooo you think there from 2000??

you really think they are making fakes of 2000s? :rofl:

if they had a FSR then clearly it would be obvious but come on now.

just like Soleup/Air randy randomly gets 1 or 2 pairs and he sells some older retros, probably from his collection or something.
 
If one can't call a pair authentic without any strings, footnotes or added info attached - it's a fake pair in my book.

Therefore, early release pairs are fake to me.
I don't think I've heard anyone that disagrees with my above statement call early release pairs authentic.
Use terms like grey market all you want, they still aren't authentic.
 
you really think they are making fakes of 2000s?
roll.gif


if they had a FSR then clearly it would be obvious but come on now.

just like Soleup/Air randy randomly gets 1 or 2 pairs and he sells some older retros, probably from his collection or something.
Who knows im asking because to me to have these kicks in stock is kinda rare and to sell them for 449 brand new? I personally would never trust anything like that.
 
i did even say anything, im not defending them honestly because i could care less but some of you think you know 100% when you dont.

ive actually owned some so at least i can share opinions :lol:

you defended a fake sneaker site to the bitter end around the time of the concords
and i don't think anyone should listen to anything you say really

once compromised, that's it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom