- 5,570
- 302
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2006
Jack may be more important than Landry but its gonna be tough for Warriors to just rely on jump shots when David Lee is on the bench.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Spoken like some guys who only watched the Kings when they played the Warriors this year. How'd that go, anyway? Just in case you didn't know, here it is. 1-3 vs. Sacramento. Klay Thompson? 14/5/3.5 on 33% shooting. Salmons was guarding him. No sieve on defense eh? Landry? 9.3/5.3 so he's close to his season numbers. Jason Thompson? 10.5/9.5, not a PF huh?what in the **** is this garbage.
brooke lopez a 7 footer who doesn't rebound or defend particularly well.
jason thompson a 4 who doesn't play like one at all.
marcus thornton and john salmons shooters with no conscience and sieves on defense.
COOL MAN.
menace what the hell happened to your post count
Spoken like some guys who only watched the Kings when they played the Warriors this year. How'd that go, anyway? Just in case you didn't know, here it is. 1-3 vs. Sacramento. Klay Thompson? 14/5/3.5 on 33% shooting. Salmons was guarding him. No sieve on defense eh? Landry? 9.3/5.3 so he's close to his season numbers. Jason Thompson? 10.5/9.5, not a PF huh?
So, you're telling me you'd rather stick with Bogut who will miss at least half the season again, won't come back 100%, and will allow quick point guards to get their shots in the lane? Because that's just what happened in the Spurs series. Bogut was GOD AWFUL rotating to Parker on screens. He didn't even move two steps towards him to defend. So tell me, what's the difference between that and Brook Lopez? At least Lopez will give you the 19 and 7 every night compared to Bogut's...what? 5 and 7? They make the same amount of money. I don't care what anyone says about Lopez, at least he can play every night. Bogut can't. That is painfully evident. Watch the film again if you don't believe me.
When are the Warriors getting new jerseys again? The TMC style with updated font would look good.
View media item 347214
you pointing out that clay has a bad game doesn't mean anything to me. he's a 1 trick pony and he's not even good at that. it's well documented that he doesn't shoot or do anything else particularly well.Spoken like some guys who only watched the Kings when they played the Warriors this year. How'd that go, anyway? Just in case you didn't know, here it is. 1-3 vs. Sacramento. Klay Thompson? 14/5/3.5 on 33% shooting. Salmons was guarding him. No sieve on defense eh? Landry? 9.3/5.3 so he's close to his season numbers. Jason Thompson? 10.5/9.5, not a PF huh?what in the **** is this garbage.
brooke lopez a 7 footer who doesn't rebound or defend particularly well.
jason thompson a 4 who doesn't play like one at all.
marcus thornton and john salmons shooters with no conscience and sieves on defense.
COOL MAN.
So, you're telling me you'd rather stick with Bogut who will miss at least half the season again, won't come back 100%, and will allow quick point guards to get their shots in the lane? Because that's just what happened in the Spurs series. Bogut was GOD AWFUL rotating to Parker on screens. He didn't even move two steps towards him to defend. So tell me, what's the difference between that and Brook Lopez? At least Lopez will give you the 19 and 7 every night compared to Bogut's...what? 5 and 7? They make the same amount of money. I don't care what anyone says about Lopez, at least he can play every night. Bogut can't. That is painfully evident. Watch the film again if you don't believe me.
i've been tryin but people don't stay on top of lineups and i think our 11 scoring categories scare people.we should try to get more NT'ers in your fantasy league
Bogut who still doesn't look right, and may never, still got 11 rebounds in 25 minutes against the Spurs this series.Spoken like some guys who only watched the Kings when they played the Warriors this year. How'd that go, anyway? Just in case you didn't know, here it is. 1-3 vs. Sacramento. Klay Thompson? 14/5/3.5 on 33% shooting. Salmons was guarding him. No sieve on defense eh? Landry? 9.3/5.3 so he's close to his season numbers. Jason Thompson? 10.5/9.5, not a PF huh?
So, you're telling me you'd rather stick with Bogut who will miss at least half the season again, won't come back 100%, and will allow quick point guards to get their shots in the lane? Because that's just what happened in the Spurs series. Bogut was GOD AWFUL rotating to Parker on screens. He didn't even move two steps towards him to defend. So tell me, what's the difference between that and Brook Lopez? At least Lopez will give you the 19 and 7 every night compared to Bogut's...what? 5 and 7? They make the same amount of money. I don't care what anyone says about Lopez, at least he can play every night. Bogut can't. That is painfully evident. Watch the film again if you don't believe me.
why, 'cause of david lee all of a sudden they're getting empty rebounding numbers and it's a good thing?Except rebounding isn't an issue with the warriors anymore like years past. The team had 5 more rebs per game this year mostly without Bogut. The issue is that the warriors only have one low post threat, and he was on one leg the last month.
To me, this is no different than saying the sky is blue. However, it seems like the overwhelming majority of Warrior fans would rather we not bring Dwight on board (assuming we can make the salary work). Calling him a team killer and a chemistry killer, which are both laughable. Dwight was hurt last year. I'd take my chances on him if we got the chance (although I dont think it really is much of a risk personally).Dwight> Any C we have right now
Same. I'd rather give up thompson than barnes.I'd do a Bogut + Thompson. If Lakers would, I'd do it in a second.
To me, this is no different than saying the sky is blue. However, it seems like the overwhelming majority of Warrior fans would rather we not bring Dwight on board (assuming we can make the salary work). Calling him a team killer and a chemistry killer, which are both laughable. Dwight was hurt last year. I'd take my chances on him if we got the chance (although I dont think it really is much of a risk personally).Dwight> Any C we have right now
I personally would trade every single one of the big men we have under contract currently (minus Festus), for Dwight. Yes, including our third team all-NBA player. Any or all of Bogut, Biedrins and Lee for Dwight (S&T) and filler. We would make out like bandits. I know its not gonna happen, but it sure would be nice.
Curry
Jack
Klay
Harrison
Dwight
Landry
Rush
Draymond
Festus
Then we could try to trade RJeff's expiring contract for more help. Would be a pretty nice team IMO.
Now it seems some of those peers might be more inclined to look the Warriors' way this coming offseason. Current Lakers center Dwight Howard, for one, is reported by Mark Medina of the Long Beach Press Telegram as being intrigued by Golden State. Howard is an unrestricted free agent in July, and has given no definitive word on where he will end up. In the case of Golden State, cap concerns prevent them from simply signing Howard, so any scenario in which he ends up with the team would have to involve a sign and trade with Los Angeles. Most speculation seems to focus on a package including the large expiring contract of Andrew Bogut and either Harrison Barnes or Klay Thompson.